Dahmer

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What difference is there between this and movies shows about the Holocaust? Or movies like Wolf of Wall Street about a guy who inflicted severe financial harm on many people.? Or being entertained by every war movie ever made showing deaths of soldiers? The fact that this makes your skin crawl means acting is good. Many of us were too young to remember all.of the details and haven't gone out of our way to read up on Dahmer.

What’s the difference? For one thing, movies about the Holocaust are frequently about the machine and the everyday people that let an atrocity on that scale happen. Same thing with a guy who tanked markets and ruined people - there’s a political message, it’s still ongoing This stuff? This type of stuff always feels a bit like a snuff film. In a sense, it’s pornographic. You’re watching a program about a guy who killed and ate his victims and tortured them for his own sexual pleasure.

That PP is clearly getting off on the subject matter. Who else would want to watch something the victims families have already said they wish hadn’t been made, about that subject matter? It’s disgusting.

Give me a break. How many people 'get off' on mobster movies and shows about real life people? I literally watched a movie with Michael Shannon who played notorious mafia hitman Richard the Iceman Kuklinski. His kids are still around and so are family members of his victims. No one was outraged when the movie Iceman came out. Or how about Johnny Depp's movie about Whitey Bulger (Black Mass). Were you outraged then when that movie came out because people flocked to theaters to watch a film about a mass murdering psychopath who still has victim families alive today?

The controversy around this show is asinine. It is selective outrage calling for censorship, which is even more outrageous. Art reflects life. Dahmer killings are historical events that have every right to be turned into a show/movie just like every other movie/show about serial killers, mobsters, war, and genocide that has come before it.

Yeah I’m failing to understand why Dahmer is off limits. There are so many dramatizations of horrific real life murders and serial killers. Just in the last year or so off the top of my head…Under the Banner of Heaven, Blackbird, The Staircase, Candy, Dr. Death. Why is Dahmer different?

There has been a pretty big push from a lot of the family members of victims not to make these movies. I know that the kids from the woman killed in All About Pam has been very open about how hurtful the show was. I don't think it is new that families are upset about these movies. I think it is likely new that people are becoming away of how these movies impact victims families.

I'm a poster who said they are having issues watching it. I disagree it should be off limits, for any number of reasons. And while the family members' views are not irrelevant, nor are they dispositive. (And yes, maybe I would feel differently if it were my family member. But maybe not. I can't know that and neither can you). If people do not want to watch it, then they shouldn't do so.

I just don’t understand the content police. They don’t like it therefore it shouldn’t exist. It’s bizarre.

I think exploiting another family's/other families' tragedy is gross. I don't know that it shouldn't exist (this isn't the sort of thing I watch, so it doesn't affect me much), but it's depressing that (A) it has an audience and (B) the people responsible for producing it are so completely indifferent to the feelings of actual human beings

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What difference is there between this and movies shows about the Holocaust? Or movies like Wolf of Wall Street about a guy who inflicted severe financial harm on many people.? Or being entertained by every war movie ever made showing deaths of soldiers? The fact that this makes your skin crawl means acting is good. Many of us were too young to remember all.of the details and haven't gone out of our way to read up on Dahmer.

What’s the difference? For one thing, movies about the Holocaust are frequently about the machine and the everyday people that let an atrocity on that scale happen. Same thing with a guy who tanked markets and ruined people - there’s a political message, it’s still ongoing This stuff? This type of stuff always feels a bit like a snuff film. In a sense, it’s pornographic. You’re watching a program about a guy who killed and ate his victims and tortured them for his own sexual pleasure.

That PP is clearly getting off on the subject matter. Who else would want to watch something the victims families have already said they wish hadn’t been made, about that subject matter? It’s disgusting.

Give me a break. How many people 'get off' on mobster movies and shows about real life people? I literally watched a movie with Michael Shannon who played notorious mafia hitman Richard the Iceman Kuklinski. His kids are still around and so are family members of his victims. No one was outraged when the movie Iceman came out. Or how about Johnny Depp's movie about Whitey Bulger (Black Mass). Were you outraged then when that movie came out because people flocked to theaters to watch a film about a mass murdering psychopath who still has victim families alive today?

The controversy around this show is asinine. It is selective outrage calling for censorship, which is even more outrageous. Art reflects life. Dahmer killings are historical events that have every right to be turned into a show/movie just like every other movie/show about serial killers, mobsters, war, and genocide that has come before it.

Yeah I’m failing to understand why Dahmer is off limits. There are so many dramatizations of horrific real life murders and serial killers. Just in the last year or so off the top of my head…Under the Banner of Heaven, Blackbird, The Staircase, Candy, Dr. Death. Why is Dahmer different?

There has been a pretty big push from a lot of the family members of victims not to make these movies. I know that the kids from the woman killed in All About Pam has been very open about how hurtful the show was. I don't think it is new that families are upset about these movies. I think it is likely new that people are becoming away of how these movies impact victims families.

I'm a poster who said they are having issues watching it. I disagree it should be off limits, for any number of reasons. And while the family members' views are not irrelevant, nor are they dispositive. (And yes, maybe I would feel differently if it were my family member. But maybe not. I can't know that and neither can you). If people do not want to watch it, then they shouldn't do so.

I just don’t understand the content police. They don’t like it therefore it shouldn’t exist. It’s bizarre.

I am not saying it should not e it’s.

I am saying what is it about people with options and time on their hands, that this is what we choose to focus on.

What our culture chooses to examine/highlight in detail.

I think that is sick and twisted.

I find it fascinating. I can assure you that I am not sick and twisted. I just have different preferences than you do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What difference is there between this and movies shows about the Holocaust? Or movies like Wolf of Wall Street about a guy who inflicted severe financial harm on many people.? Or being entertained by every war movie ever made showing deaths of soldiers? The fact that this makes your skin crawl means acting is good. Many of us were too young to remember all.of the details and haven't gone out of our way to read up on Dahmer.

What’s the difference? For one thing, movies about the Holocaust are frequently about the machine and the everyday people that let an atrocity on that scale happen. Same thing with a guy who tanked markets and ruined people - there’s a political message, it’s still ongoing This stuff? This type of stuff always feels a bit like a snuff film. In a sense, it’s pornographic. You’re watching a program about a guy who killed and ate his victims and tortured them for his own sexual pleasure.

That PP is clearly getting off on the subject matter. Who else would want to watch something the victims families have already said they wish hadn’t been made, about that subject matter? It’s disgusting.

Give me a break. How many people 'get off' on mobster movies and shows about real life people? I literally watched a movie with Michael Shannon who played notorious mafia hitman Richard the Iceman Kuklinski. His kids are still around and so are family members of his victims. No one was outraged when the movie Iceman came out. Or how about Johnny Depp's movie about Whitey Bulger (Black Mass). Were you outraged then when that movie came out because people flocked to theaters to watch a film about a mass murdering psychopath who still has victim families alive today?

The controversy around this show is asinine. It is selective outrage calling for censorship, which is even more outrageous. Art reflects life. Dahmer killings are historical events that have every right to be turned into a show/movie just like every other movie/show about serial killers, mobsters, war, and genocide that has come before it.

Yeah I’m failing to understand why Dahmer is off limits. There are so many dramatizations of horrific real life murders and serial killers. Just in the last year or so off the top of my head…Under the Banner of Heaven, Blackbird, The Staircase, Candy, Dr. Death. Why is Dahmer different?

There has been a pretty big push from a lot of the family members of victims not to make these movies. I know that the kids from the woman killed in All About Pam has been very open about how hurtful the show was. I don't think it is new that families are upset about these movies. I think it is likely new that people are becoming away of how these movies impact victims families.

I'm a poster who said they are having issues watching it. I disagree it should be off limits, for any number of reasons. And while the family members' views are not irrelevant, nor are they dispositive. (And yes, maybe I would feel differently if it were my family member. But maybe not. I can't know that and neither can you). If people do not want to watch it, then they shouldn't do so.

I just don’t understand the content police. They don’t like it therefore it shouldn’t exist. It’s bizarre.

I think exploiting another family's/other families' tragedy is gross. I don't know that it shouldn't exist (this isn't the sort of thing I watch, so it doesn't affect me much), but it's depressing that (A) it has an audience and (B) the people responsible for producing it are so completely indifferent to the feelings of actual human beings

You sound like an annoying gatekeeper. I'm sure your S don't stink, right?

[Anonymous]

It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What difference is there between this and movies shows about the Holocaust? Or movies like Wolf of Wall Street about a guy who inflicted severe financial harm on many people.? Or being entertained by every war movie ever made showing deaths of soldiers? The fact that this makes your skin crawl means acting is good. Many of us were too young to remember all.of the details and haven't gone out of our way to read up on Dahmer.

What’s the difference? For one thing, movies about the Holocaust are frequently about the machine and the everyday people that let an atrocity on that scale happen. Same thing with a guy who tanked markets and ruined people - there’s a political message, it’s still ongoing This stuff? This type of stuff always feels a bit like a snuff film. In a sense, it’s pornographic. You’re watching a program about a guy who killed and ate his victims and tortured them for his own sexual pleasure.

That PP is clearly getting off on the subject matter. Who else would want to watch something the victims families have already said they wish hadn’t been made, about that subject matter? It’s disgusting.

Give me a break. How many people 'get off' on mobster movies and shows about real life people? I literally watched a movie with Michael Shannon who played notorious mafia hitman Richard the Iceman Kuklinski. His kids are still around and so are family members of his victims. No one was outraged when the movie Iceman came out. Or how about Johnny Depp's movie about Whitey Bulger (Black Mass). Were you outraged then when that movie came out because people flocked to theaters to watch a film about a mass murdering psychopath who still has victim families alive today?

The controversy around this show is asinine. It is selective outrage calling for censorship, which is even more outrageous. Art reflects life. Dahmer killings are historical events that have every right to be turned into a show/movie just like every other movie/show about serial killers, mobsters, war, and genocide that has come before it.

Yeah I’m failing to understand why Dahmer is off limits. There are so many dramatizations of horrific real life murders and serial killers. Just in the last year or so off the top of my head…Under the Banner of Heaven, Blackbird, The Staircase, Candy, Dr. Death. Why is Dahmer different?

There has been a pretty big push from a lot of the family members of victims not to make these movies. I know that the kids from the woman killed in All About Pam has been very open about how hurtful the show was. I don't think it is new that families are upset about these movies. I think it is likely new that people are becoming away of how these movies impact victims families.

I'm a poster who said they are having issues watching it. I disagree it should be off limits, for any number of reasons. And while the family members' views are not irrelevant, nor are they dispositive. (And yes, maybe I would feel differently if it were my family member. But maybe not. I can't know that and neither can you). If people do not want to watch it, then they shouldn't do so.

I just don’t understand the content police. They don’t like it therefore it shouldn’t exist. It’s bizarre.

I am not saying it should not e it’s.

I am saying what is it about people with options and time on their hands, that this is what we choose to focus on.

What our culture chooses to examine/highlight in detail.

I think that is sick and twisted.

I find it fascinating. I can assure you that I am not sick and twisted. I just have different preferences than you do.

I’m not that PP but I definitely think you’re sick and twisted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What difference is there between this and movies shows about the Holocaust? Or movies like Wolf of Wall Street about a guy who inflicted severe financial harm on many people.? Or being entertained by every war movie ever made showing deaths of soldiers? The fact that this makes your skin crawl means acting is good. Many of us were too young to remember all.of the details and haven't gone out of our way to read up on Dahmer.

What’s the difference? For one thing, movies about the Holocaust are frequently about the machine and the everyday people that let an atrocity on that scale happen. Same thing with a guy who tanked markets and ruined people - there’s a political message, it’s still ongoing This stuff? This type of stuff always feels a bit like a snuff film. In a sense, it’s pornographic. You’re watching a program about a guy who killed and ate his victims and tortured them for his own sexual pleasure.

That PP is clearly getting off on the subject matter. Who else would want to watch something the victims families have already said they wish hadn’t been made, about that subject matter? It’s disgusting.

Give me a break. How many people 'get off' on mobster movies and shows about real life people? I literally watched a movie with Michael Shannon who played notorious mafia hitman Richard the Iceman Kuklinski. His kids are still around and so are family members of his victims. No one was outraged when the movie Iceman came out. Or how about Johnny Depp's movie about Whitey Bulger (Black Mass). Were you outraged then when that movie came out because people flocked to theaters to watch a film about a mass murdering psychopath who still has victim families alive today?

The controversy around this show is asinine. It is selective outrage calling for censorship, which is even more outrageous. Art reflects life. Dahmer killings are historical events that have every right to be turned into a show/movie just like every other movie/show about serial killers, mobsters, war, and genocide that has come before it.

Yeah I’m failing to understand why Dahmer is off limits. There are so many dramatizations of horrific real life murders and serial killers. Just in the last year or so off the top of my head…Under the Banner of Heaven, Blackbird, The Staircase, Candy, Dr. Death. Why is Dahmer different?

There has been a pretty big push from a lot of the family members of victims not to make these movies. I know that the kids from the woman killed in All About Pam has been very open about how hurtful the show was. I don't think it is new that families are upset about these movies. I think it is likely new that people are becoming away of how these movies impact victims families.

I'm a poster who said they are having issues watching it. I disagree it should be off limits, for any number of reasons. And while the family members' views are not irrelevant, nor are they dispositive. (And yes, maybe I would feel differently if it were my family member. But maybe not. I can't know that and neither can you). If people do not want to watch it, then they shouldn't do so.

I just don’t understand the content police. They don’t like it therefore it shouldn’t exist. It’s bizarre.

I am not saying it should not e it’s.

I am saying what is it about people with options and time on their hands, that this is what we choose to focus on.

What our culture chooses to examine/highlight in detail.

I think that is sick and twisted.

I find it fascinating. I can assure you that I am not sick and twisted. I just have different preferences than you do.

I’m not that PP but I definitely think you’re sick and twisted.

You can think whatever you want. Doesn’t make it true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:How sad that our culture spends so much of their leisure time watching shows that depict violence for entertainment. Thank about that? It is reminiscent of the Roman coliseums. That cannot be healthy or a good sign.

We could be watching music or documentaries about science or upstanding heroes, but we CONSTANTLY focus on documenting the lives and deeds of our most sick citizens. Why Why Why??

As a woman, I could spend all night every night watching the likes of Dateline or some police drama about other women who were killed by their exes or spouses or raped by some serial predator.

In our spare time, this is what people choose to do. Millions are spent on recreating this stuff. Ponder that.

I watch dateline with my daughter as part of my homeschool unit on "How not to get murdered."

[Anonymous]

I'm not sure if I will finish it - its an insanely disturbing story and I had trouble sleeping last night. I put it up there with the Exorcist except it's real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What difference is there between this and movies shows about the Holocaust? Or movies like Wolf of Wall Street about a guy who inflicted severe financial harm on many people.? Or being entertained by every war movie ever made showing deaths of soldiers? The fact that this makes your skin crawl means acting is good. Many of us were too young to remember all.of the details and haven't gone out of our way to read up on Dahmer.

What’s the difference? For one thing, movies about the Holocaust are frequently about the machine and the everyday people that let an atrocity on that scale happen. Same thing with a guy who tanked markets and ruined people - there’s a political message, it’s still ongoing This stuff? This type of stuff always feels a bit like a snuff film. In a sense, it’s pornographic. You’re watching a program about a guy who killed and ate his victims and tortured them for his own sexual pleasure.

That PP is clearly getting off on the subject matter. Who else would want to watch something the victims families have already said they wish hadn’t been made, about that subject matter? It’s disgusting.

Give me a break. How many people 'get off' on mobster movies and shows about real life people? I literally watched a movie with Michael Shannon who played notorious mafia hitman Richard the Iceman Kuklinski. His kids are still around and so are family members of his victims. No one was outraged when the movie Iceman came out. Or how about Johnny Depp's movie about Whitey Bulger (Black Mass). Were you outraged then when that movie came out because people flocked to theaters to watch a film about a mass murdering psychopath who still has victim families alive today?

The controversy around this show is asinine. It is selective outrage calling for censorship, which is even more outrageous. Art reflects life. Dahmer killings are historical events that have every right to be turned into a show/movie just like every other movie/show about serial killers, mobsters, war, and genocide that has come before it.

Yeah I’m failing to understand why Dahmer is off limits. There are so many dramatizations of horrific real life murders and serial killers. Just in the last year or so off the top of my head…Under the Banner of Heaven, Blackbird, The Staircase, Candy, Dr. Death. Why is Dahmer different?

There has been a pretty big push from a lot of the family members of victims not to make these movies. I know that the kids from the woman killed in All About Pam has been very open about how hurtful the show was. I don't think it is new that families are upset about these movies. I think it is likely new that people are becoming away of how these movies impact victims families.

I'm a poster who said they are having issues watching it. I disagree it should be off limits, for any number of reasons. And while the family members' views are not irrelevant, nor are they dispositive. (And yes, maybe I would feel differently if it were my family member. But maybe not. I can't know that and neither can you). If people do not want to watch it, then they shouldn't do so.

I just don’t understand the content police. They don’t like it therefore it shouldn’t exist. It’s bizarre.

I am not saying it should not e it’s.

I am saying what is it about people with options and time on their hands, that this is what we choose to focus on.

What our culture chooses to examine/highlight in detail.

I think that is sick and twisted.

I find it fascinating. I can assure you that I am not sick and twisted. I just have different preferences than you do.

I’m not that PP but I definitely think you’re sick and twisted.

NP. Lots of people, regular, normal people, find it fascinating.

Mostly bored women aged 20-50. A pretty large group. True Crime, even the worst of the worst, has a big following.

It is fascinating.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure if I will finish it - its an insanely disturbing story and I had trouble sleeping last night. I put it up there with the Exorcist except it's real.

The Exorcist was based on a true story in PG County, btw.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorcism_of_Roland_Doe

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What difference is there between this and movies shows about the Holocaust? Or movies like Wolf of Wall Street about a guy who inflicted severe financial harm on many people.? Or being entertained by every war movie ever made showing deaths of soldiers? The fact that this makes your skin crawl means acting is good. Many of us were too young to remember all.of the details and haven't gone out of our way to read up on Dahmer.

What’s the difference? For one thing, movies about the Holocaust are frequently about the machine and the everyday people that let an atrocity on that scale happen. Same thing with a guy who tanked markets and ruined people - there’s a political message, it’s still ongoing This stuff? This type of stuff always feels a bit like a snuff film. In a sense, it’s pornographic. You’re watching a program about a guy who killed and ate his victims and tortured them for his own sexual pleasure.

That PP is clearly getting off on the subject matter. Who else would want to watch something the victims families have already said they wish hadn’t been made, about that subject matter? It’s disgusting.

Give me a break. How many people 'get off' on mobster movies and shows about real life people? I literally watched a movie with Michael Shannon who played notorious mafia hitman Richard the Iceman Kuklinski. His kids are still around and so are family members of his victims. No one was outraged when the movie Iceman came out. Or how about Johnny Depp's movie about Whitey Bulger (Black Mass). Were you outraged then when that movie came out because people flocked to theaters to watch a film about a mass murdering psychopath who still has victim families alive today?

The controversy around this show is asinine. It is selective outrage calling for censorship, which is even more outrageous. Art reflects life. Dahmer killings are historical events that have every right to be turned into a show/movie just like every other movie/show about serial killers, mobsters, war, and genocide that has come before it.

Yeah I’m failing to understand why Dahmer is off limits. There are so many dramatizations of horrific real life murders and serial killers. Just in the last year or so off the top of my head…Under the Banner of Heaven, Blackbird, The Staircase, Candy, Dr. Death. Why is Dahmer different?

There has been a pretty big push from a lot of the family members of victims not to make these movies. I know that the kids from the woman killed in All About Pam has been very open about how hurtful the show was. I don't think it is new that families are upset about these movies. I think it is likely new that people are becoming away of how these movies impact victims families.

I'm a poster who said they are having issues watching it. I disagree it should be off limits, for any number of reasons. And while the family members' views are not irrelevant, nor are they dispositive. (And yes, maybe I would feel differently if it were my family member. But maybe not. I can't know that and neither can you). If people do not want to watch it, then they shouldn't do so.

I just don’t understand the content police. They don’t like it therefore it shouldn’t exist. It’s bizarre.

I think exploiting another family's/other families' tragedy is gross. I don't know that it shouldn't exist (this isn't the sort of thing I watch, so it doesn't affect me much), but it's depressing that (A) it has an audience and (B) the people responsible for producing it are so completely indifferent to the feelings of actual human beings

OMG.

Change the channel and shut up already. Everyone has an opinion about something, and 99% of the time they suck. Just don't watch if you don't like it. Just because you don't like the idea of something being made or told is no reason for censorship.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.

They are definitely fragile little creeps, and their insistence that anyone calling attention to the problems with making some of this content is "policing" or "censorship" really tips their hand.

No one is arguing that it should be outlawed. I'm not Governor Youngkin or one of his pearl-clutching devotees. I'm just asking if you've considered the ways that this stuff is dehumanizing for the victims and their families. Clearly you don't want to.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.

They are definitely fragile little creeps, and their insistence that anyone calling attention to the problems with making some of this content is "policing" or "censorship" really tips their hand.

No one is arguing that it should be outlawed. I'm not Governor Youngkin or one of his pearl-clutching devotees. I'm just asking if you've considered the ways that this stuff is dehumanizing for the victims and their families. Clearly you don't want to.

I’m not sure why, then, your problem is with those who view it. I would think those who produce it would be the bigger issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.

They are definitely fragile little creeps, and their insistence that anyone calling attention to the problems with making some of this content is "policing" or "censorship" really tips their hand.

No one is arguing that it should be outlawed. I'm not Governor Youngkin or one of his pearl-clutching devotees. I'm just asking if you've considered the ways that this stuff is dehumanizing for the victims and their families. Clearly you don't want to.

+1

People enjoying this stuff like it’s some fictional British mystery is repellent. These were real people, real victims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.

They are definitely fragile little creeps, and their insistence that anyone calling attention to the problems with making some of this content is "policing" or "censorship" really tips their hand.

No one is arguing that it should be outlawed. I'm not Governor Youngkin or one of his pearl-clutching devotees. I'm just asking if you've considered the ways that this stuff is dehumanizing for the victims and their families. Clearly you don't want to.

+1

People enjoying this stuff like it’s some fictional British mystery is repellent. These were real people, real victims.

Shows like this are made ALL THE TIME. Documentaries. Mini series. Movies. Tv Series. You tube clips. Are you seriously suggesting that these things should be banned? Or do you just have a problem with the people who watch them?