Dahmer

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.


They are definitely fragile little creeps, and their insistence that anyone calling attention to the problems with making some of this content is "policing" or "censorship" really tips their hand.

No one is arguing that it should be outlawed. I'm not Governor Youngkin or one of his pearl-clutching devotees. I'm just asking if you've considered the ways that this stuff is dehumanizing for the victims and their families. Clearly you don't want to.

+1

People enjoying this stuff like it’s some fictional British mystery is repellent. These were real people, real victims. [/quote

You need to check yourself clown and boycott everything on tv then
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.


They are definitely fragile little creeps, and their insistence that anyone calling attention to the problems with making some of this content is "policing" or "censorship" really tips their hand.

No one is arguing that it should be outlawed. I'm not Governor Youngkin or one of his pearl-clutching devotees. I'm just asking if you've considered the ways that this stuff is dehumanizing for the victims and their families. Clearly you don't want to.

+1

People enjoying this stuff like it’s some fictional British mystery is repellent. These were real people, real victims.


Rita Isbell wrote this
My brother was murdered by Jeffrey Dahmer. Here's what it was like watching the Netflix show that recreated the emotional statement I gave in court.
https://www.insider.com/rita-isbell-sister-jeffrey-dahmer-victim-talks-about-netflix-show-2022-9
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.


They are definitely fragile little creeps, and their insistence that anyone calling attention to the problems with making some of this content is "policing" or "censorship" really tips their hand.

No one is arguing that it should be outlawed. I'm not Governor Youngkin or one of his pearl-clutching devotees. I'm just asking if you've considered the ways that this stuff is dehumanizing for the victims and their families. Clearly you don't want to.

+1

People enjoying this stuff like it’s some fictional British mystery is repellent. These were real people, real victims.


Rita Isbell wrote this
My brother was murdered by Jeffrey Dahmer. Here's what it was like watching the Netflix show that recreated the emotional statement I gave in court.
https://www.insider.com/rita-isbell-sister-jeffrey-dahmer-victim-talks-about-netflix-show-2022-9


I hope she sues
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.


They are definitely fragile little creeps, and their insistence that anyone calling attention to the problems with making some of this content is "policing" or "censorship" really tips their hand.

No one is arguing that it should be outlawed. I'm not Governor Youngkin or one of his pearl-clutching devotees. I'm just asking if you've considered the ways that this stuff is dehumanizing for the victims and their families. Clearly you don't want to.


+1

Fragile little creeps is a spot-on description. Well done.
Anonymous
Finished it today. Very gory. Definitely about three episodes too long. I thought it was very empathetic to the victims and their families. Much emphasis on how the police ignored complaints from black and brown people and how they brushed away missing persons reports. There were so many times that JD could have been stopped. The episode about the Deaf man was extremely moving.

People have always been fascinated with true crime and serial killers since the days of Jack the Ripper.
Anonymous
First it was on the Post's "What to Watch" list, and now they're saying you shouldn't have:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2022/09/27/dahmer-monster-netflix-victims/
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.


I couldn't care less what some anonymous judgmental harpy thinks about me, or pretty much anything else. Just to clarify.
I'll keep what I think of you to myself.
Anonymous
Did dahmer really have a 140 plus IQ. The only high IQ serial killer I can think of was that really tall big guy whose name escapes me now
Anonymous
The most disturbing part of it for me was how sympathetically he was portrayed. His father seemed to think he was always a victim. I did like learning more about the victims and their families. But it did feel a little “poor Jeffrey” to me.
Anonymous
I want to watch this immensely but am afraid to watch it alone…..
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The most disturbing part of it for me was how sympathetically he was portrayed. His father seemed to think he was always a victim. I did like learning more about the victims and their families. But it did feel a little “poor Jeffrey” to me.

I don’t think so
We do not fully understand the human psyche
Cases like this have most likely happened before and there might even be more like him out there

Other issue is police and law enforcement. Cities like Milwaukee fund the police force based on income, not the number of people. So densely populated poor areas have less policing and the little law enforcement that is available is over worked
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.


They are definitely fragile little creeps, and their insistence that anyone calling attention to the problems with making some of this content is "policing" or "censorship" really tips their hand.

No one is arguing that it should be outlawed. I'm not Governor Youngkin or one of his pearl-clutching devotees. I'm just asking if you've considered the ways that this stuff is dehumanizing for the victims and their families. Clearly you don't want to.

+1

People enjoying this stuff like it’s some fictional British mystery is repellent. These were real people, real victims.


Rita Isbell wrote this
My brother was murdered by Jeffrey Dahmer. Here's what it was like watching the Netflix show that recreated the emotional statement I gave in court.
https://www.insider.com/rita-isbell-sister-jeffrey-dahmer-victim-talks-about-netflix-show-2022-9


I hope she sues


Sues for what? It’s public record, nothing to sue for.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I think the problem is more that there aren’t movies about victims and victims families.


But this kind of was. The victims and their families were a big part of the series.

I don’t like true crime. I don’t watch true crime. But I watched this and thought it was well done. I was also happy when it was over.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.


They are definitely fragile little creeps, and their insistence that anyone calling attention to the problems with making some of this content is "policing" or "censorship" really tips their hand.

No one is arguing that it should be outlawed. I'm not Governor Youngkin or one of his pearl-clutching devotees. I'm just asking if you've considered the ways that this stuff is dehumanizing for the victims and their families. Clearly you don't want to.

+1

People enjoying this stuff like it’s some fictional British mystery is repellent. These were real people, real victims.


Shows like this are made ALL THE TIME. Documentaries. Mini series. Movies. Tv Series. You tube clips. Are you seriously suggesting that these things should be banned? Or do you just have a problem with the people who watch them?


DP here and yes, I have a problem with people that watch them because they create an audience for producers who make this stuff. The whole grotesque industry of “true crimes” that involve murders and wretched humans terrorizing and killing other people is twisted. There’s nothing redeeming about this stuff other than some people find it “entertaining”. These are real victims who endured horrific ends and their families coping with the aftermath and having it served up as other peoples’ entertainment.

I’m not interested in banning but sure as heck wish there weren’t people who keep this market going.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It’s funny how people who are so adamant that content like this is enjoyable and that it should be made are also so incredibly sensitive about how other people think they are gross and sick for enjoying it. You can’t police how other people see you. Stop whining about it.


They are definitely fragile little creeps, and their insistence that anyone calling attention to the problems with making some of this content is "policing" or "censorship" really tips their hand.

No one is arguing that it should be outlawed. I'm not Governor Youngkin or one of his pearl-clutching devotees. I'm just asking if you've considered the ways that this stuff is dehumanizing for the victims and their families. Clearly you don't want to.

+1

People enjoying this stuff like it’s some fictional British mystery is repellent. These were real people, real victims.


Shows like this are made ALL THE TIME. Documentaries. Mini series. Movies. Tv Series. You tube clips. Are you seriously suggesting that these things should be banned? Or do you just have a problem with the people who watch them?


DP here and yes, I have a problem with people that watch them because they create an audience for producers who make this stuff. The whole grotesque industry of “true crimes” that involve murders and wretched humans terrorizing and killing other people is twisted. There’s nothing redeeming about this stuff other than some people find it “entertaining”. These are real victims who endured horrific ends and their families coping with the aftermath and having it served up as other peoples’ entertainment.

I’m not interested in banning but sure as heck wish there weren’t people who keep this market going.


I actually find it more repulsive that people watch Lifetime and L&O SVU. Those stories are made for entertainment. I thought this series was more insightful about the victims, society, and law enforcement. It was a docudrama and not just drama. It was also tastefully filmed and we didn’t have to see most of the awful things he did.
post reply Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture
Message Quick Reply
Go to: