The new reign of King Charles III has begun

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:King Charles just had his first address. I thought it was quite good and he even mentioned his well-wishes for Harry and Meghan so there can’t be any headlines about a snub there.

You can’t be serious. Calling them by their given names, rather than their titles, was the snub.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about Harry and Megan? I have not been huge fans but it seems they are really getting iced out. There should be a formal announcement that there kids are a Prince/Princess. Charles should also find a way to allow them to be back in the family. Diana would be so sad to see all that has happened.

Plus one

Charles III’s lane reference to joint they build a happy life together abroad missed an a opportunity to signal the value of their multiracial family to the monarchy .., even the relative royal rockstars William and Kate faltered on their last tour of commonwealth Caribbean countries as they sounded out of touch with modern realities …

Everything points to William not liking that Harry married Meghan. William warned Harry off, Harry got pissed. William said you are out second born.

Um no. Charles has said over and over he wants a slimmed down monarchy. It was only natural that Harry would become less important

Charles' slimmed down monarchy always included both his sons. Hence this picture. What he, and William, didn't account for was a wife they didn't like or didn't fit with their vision of a dim klutzy Fergie-like figure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will the kids now be the Wales children at school (like William and Harry were as kids) or will they remain the Cambridge children?

NP with a question-why don't these people have last names?

Huh?? It’s Windsor!!!

Or Mountbatten-Windsor for Harry’s

Windsor is their house.

William’s full name is William Arthur Philip Louis.

And his last name. Your house is you last name traditionally, though they hyphenated the Mountbatten. They do have surnames

Only in certain circumstances. Harry and Meghan use Mountbatten-Windsor because they have suspended the use of the title “His/Her Royal Highness.” Those who have HRH titles don’t use a surname. Apparently William and Harry chose to use “Wales” when they were in school and in the military, but it wasn’t really protocol, it was just something they decided to do.

https://www.royal.uk/royal-family-name

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:King Charles just had his first address. I thought it was quite good and he even mentioned his well-wishes for Harry and Meghan so there can’t be any headlines about a snub there.

You can’t be serious. Calling them by their given names, rather than their titles, was the snub.

That’s ridiculous. He called William and Catherine by their given names, as well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:King Charles just had his first address. I thought it was quite good and he even mentioned his well-wishes for Harry and Meghan so there can’t be any headlines about a snub there.

You can’t be serious. Calling them by their given names, rather than their titles, was the snub.

That’s ridiculous. He called William and Catherine by their given names, as well.

DP. I’m not going to read anything into Charles speech. I noticed he didn’t mention support from his siblings at all and mentioned MY mother at least three times. So it felt a little self-centered but he’s a monarch so I can’t say much on that either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:William and Kate just made Prince and Princess of Wales

Well that didn't take long
https://www.instagram.com/princeandprincessofwales/

Did you catch that they changed their handle to D of D of Cornwall and Cambridge when the Queen was still dead in her bed? The thirst is real.

Charles was also declared monarch before the Queen was even cold. I guess his thirst was even more real.

It’s almost like he got the job as soon as she died. Which is the only way for the job to be handed down.

It's amazing how much history people don't know.

This is all a part of the process for what the peaceful transition of head of state looks like for the UK. The title changes are automatic upon death. The changes should be implemented as such.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will the kids now be the Wales children at school (like William and Harry were as kids) or will they remain the Cambridge children?

NP with a question-why don't these people have last names?

the original name was Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, but they changed it when they they were at war with Germany in WWI.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will the kids now be the Wales children at school (like William and Harry were as kids) or will they remain the Cambridge children?

NP with a question-why don't these people have last names?

the original name was Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, but they changed it when they they were at war with Germany in WWI.

Even then, those with HRH titles and the monarch/consort didn’t use last names.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:King Charles just had his first address. I thought it was quite good and he even mentioned his well-wishes for Harry and Meghan so there can’t be any headlines about a snub there.

You can’t be serious. Calling them by their given names, rather than their titles, was the snub.

I thought they didn’t want their titles anymore?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:King Charles just had his first address. I thought it was quite good and he even mentioned his well-wishes for Harry and Meghan so there can’t be any headlines about a snub there.

You can’t be serious. Calling them by their given names, rather than their titles, was the snub.

I thought they didn’t want their titles anymore?

They wanted out of the royal family, so they should be fine with being out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will the kids now be the Wales children at school (like William and Harry were as kids) or will they remain the Cambridge children?

NP with a question-why don't these people have last names?

the original name was Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, but they changed it when they they were at war with Germany in WWI.

They changed it because the name was not English
Brittish royal family is German, Windsor is an invention. Mountbatten is also an invented name. Original was Battenberg

Just think that there was a time when they had to change their centuries old name just to be English enough for the English

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:King Charles just had his first address. I thought it was quite good and he even mentioned his well-wishes for Harry and Meghan so there can’t be any headlines about a snub there.

You can’t be serious. Calling them by their given names, rather than their titles, was the snub.

I thought they didn’t want their titles anymore?

Oh, they use their titles. One prime example was when Meghan wrote a letter to Nancy Pelosi in support of paid parental leave, signing the letter from the “Duchess of Sussex.”

They’ve caught a lot of flack for continuing to use their titles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So will the kids now be the Wales children at school (like William and Harry were as kids) or will they remain the Cambridge children?

NP with a question-why don't these people have last names?

the original name was Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, but they changed it when they they were at war with Germany in WWI.

They changed it because the name was not English
Brittish royal family is German, Windsor is an invention. Mountbatten is also an invented name. Original was Battenberg

Just think that there was a time when they had to change their centuries old name just to be English enough for the English

Mountbatten and battenburg mean the same thing. It’s like how some immigrants changed their last names from Weiss to white.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:King Charles just had his first address. I thought it was quite good and he even mentioned his well-wishes for Harry and Meghan so there can’t be any headlines about a snub there.

You can’t be serious. Calling them by their given names, rather than their titles, was the snub.

I thought they didn’t want their titles anymore?

Oh, they use their titles. One prime example was when Meghan wrote a letter to Nancy Pelosi in support of paid parental leave, signing the letter from the “Duchess of Sussex.”

They’ve caught a lot of flack for continuing to use their titles.

It diminishes Meghan to rely on her title.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:King Charles just had his first address. I thought it was quite good and he even mentioned his well-wishes for Harry and Meghan so there can’t be any headlines about a snub there.

You can’t be serious. Calling them by their given names, rather than their titles, was the snub.

I thought they didn’t want their titles anymore?

Oh, they use their titles. One prime example was when Meghan wrote a letter to Nancy Pelosi in support of paid parental leave, signing the letter from the “Duchess of Sussex.”

They’ve caught a lot of flack for continuing to use their titles.

It diminishes Meghan to rely on her title.

The title is her main identity.