Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I do not think Barnard is the same as going to Columbia. I do believe based on the statements in this thread that if the Barnard students play on the same athletic team as Columbia students and they all play in the same league (because how could they not) then those Barnard students are playing in the Ivy League.
Now. the Ivy League has come to mean more than an athletic conference, but it is a concept in people's mind so how do you define the edges of a concept like that?
If what people are trying to communicate with the term "ivy league " is that a particular student completed the admissions gauntlet and won a lottery ticket to a school then admissions to Barnard is not admissions to Columbia.
The Harvard Extension discussion is interesting but given there are zero entry requirements I think it is not the same as someone earning a Harvard BA and also less "prestigious" than a Barnard BA.
The bold is laughable. Harvard extension degrees and their many 2-week certificate programs derive their prestige from Harvard. As someone said, Harvard students are just as good as Harvard extension students. They run circles around 2nd tier college students - Vandy, U of ND, USC, BU, BC, Northwestern, Emory, WashU - any day. Harvard is Harvard.