Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's be clear, everyone in the DOJ agree that Stone should serve jail time. The problem is that these four rogue prosecutors have been pushing for the high end of the sentencing guide and their supervisors dont agree.

How does Bluemthal on CNN compare this to the Saturday Night Massacre?

You left out our president who thinks he can and should tell DOJ what to do.

He said he didnt interfere. After the prosecutor memo was filed did he comment. Facts are important and speculation on him interfering isnt collaborated.

Trump is on record saying he hasn’t spoken to DOJ about this.

Ahem.

Can you comprehend English? He said he has a right to do so, but didn’t.

They announced they were changing the recommendation after he tweeted. He interfered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's be clear, everyone in the DOJ agree that Stone should serve jail time. The problem is that these four rogue prosecutors have been pushing for the high end of the sentencing guide and their supervisors dont agree.

How does Bluemthal on CNN compare this to the Saturday Night Massacre?

You left out our president who thinks he can and should tell DOJ what to do.

He said he didnt interfere. After the prosecutor memo was filed did he comment. Facts are important and speculation on him interfering isnt collaborated.

Trump is on record saying he hasn’t spoken to DOJ about this.

Ahem.

Can you comprehend English? He said he has a right to do so, but didn’t.

Do you think that someone hacked his Twitter account?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile the President says the military should look into disciplinary action against Lt. Col. Vindman

Vindman is subject to UCMJ.

Not for testifying he isn’t.

Vindman was certainly insubordinate, he is a known leaker, and an arrogant sh*t. But, he is very unlikely to be formally disciplined for his behavior. His rater, Mr. Morrison, has already given him a big slug in his OER (Officer Efficiency Report), so that will catch up with him. I’m not sure who serves as his convening authority, but the NSC will not prefer any charges against him. They have taken the proper action, dismissed him for improper conduct and he will receive an end of tour OER which likely will not be good.

The meaning of insubordinate is “defiant of authority; disobedient to orders.” and this guy was all that according to his commanding Officer. Keep in mind he declined to follow orders from the President and was telling others to ignore the orders because Trump would soon be gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile the President says the military should look into disciplinary action against Lt. Col. Vindman

Vindman is subject to UCMJ.

Not for testifying he isn’t.

Vindman was certainly insubordinate, he is a known leaker, and an arrogant sh*t. But, he is very unlikely to be formally disciplined for his behavior. His rater, Mr. Morrison, has already given him a big slug in his OER (Officer Efficiency Report), so that will catch up with him. I’m not sure who serves as his convening authority, but the NSC will not prefer any charges against him. They have taken the proper action, dismissed him for improper conduct and he will receive an end of tour OER which likely will not be good.

The meaning of insubordinate is “defiant of authority; disobedient to orders.” and this guy was all that according to his commanding Officer. Keep in mind he declined to follow orders from the President and was telling others to ignore the orders because Trump would soon be gone.

Or something.

The word is that he was planning on leaving the NSC after the impeachment but our petty president couldn't let him leave with his dignity, he needed to humiliate him. Remember how he fired Comey with maximum humiliation?

SMH

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile the President says the military should look into disciplinary action against Lt. Col. Vindman

Vindman is subject to UCMJ.

Not for testifying he isn’t.

Vindman was certainly insubordinate, he is a known leaker, and an arrogant sh*t. But, he is very unlikely to be formally disciplined for his behavior. His rater, Mr. Morrison, has already given him a big slug in his OER (Officer Efficiency Report), so that will catch up with him. I’m not sure who serves as his convening authority, but the NSC will not prefer any charges against him. They have taken the proper action, dismissed him for improper conduct and he will receive an end of tour OER which likely will not be good.

The meaning of insubordinate is “defiant of authority; disobedient to orders.” and this guy was all that according to his commanding Officer. Keep in mind he declined to follow orders from the President and was telling others to ignore the orders because Trump would soon be gone.

And the brother, the other Vindman?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's be clear, everyone in the DOJ agree that Stone should serve jail time. The problem is that these four rogue prosecutors have been pushing for the high end of the sentencing guide and their supervisors dont agree.

How does Bluemthal on CNN compare this to the Saturday Night Massacre?

You left out our president who thinks he can and should tell DOJ what to do.

He said he didnt interfere. After the prosecutor memo was filed did he comment. Facts are important and speculation on him interfering isnt collaborated.

Trump is on record saying he hasn’t spoken to DOJ about this.

Ahem.

Can you comprehend English? He said he has a right to do so, but didn’t.

And you believe anything he says? That’s adorable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile the President says the military should look into disciplinary action against Lt. Col. Vindman

Vindman is subject to UCMJ.

Not for testifying he isn’t.

Vindman was certainly insubordinate, he is a known leaker, and an arrogant sh*t. But, he is very unlikely to be formally disciplined for his behavior. His rater, Mr. Morrison, has already given him a big slug in his OER (Officer Efficiency Report), so that will catch up with him. I’m not sure who serves as his convening authority, but the NSC will not prefer any charges against him. They have taken the proper action, dismissed him for improper conduct and he will receive an end of tour OER which likely will not be good.

The meaning of insubordinate is “defiant of authority; disobedient to orders.” and this guy was all that according to his commanding Officer. Keep in mind he declined to follow orders from the President and was telling others to ignore the orders because Trump would soon be gone.

Or something.

The word is that he was planning on leaving the NSC after the impeachment but our petty president couldn't let him leave with his dignity, he needed to humiliate him. Remember how he fired Comey with maximum humiliation?

SMH

Military members don’t choose to leave their jobs. They have orders and assignments. Whatever “word” you have is wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile the President says the military should look into disciplinary action against Lt. Col. Vindman

Vindman is subject to UCMJ.

Not for testifying he isn’t.

Vindman was certainly insubordinate, he is a known leaker, and an arrogant sh*t. But, he is very unlikely to be formally disciplined for his behavior. His rater, Mr. Morrison, has already given him a big slug in his OER (Officer Efficiency Report), so that will catch up with him. I’m not sure who serves as his convening authority, but the NSC will not prefer any charges against him. They have taken the proper action, dismissed him for improper conduct and he will receive an end of tour OER which likely will not be good.

The meaning of insubordinate is “defiant of authority; disobedient to orders.” and this guy was all that according to his commanding Officer. Keep in mind he declined to follow orders from the President and was telling others to ignore the orders because Trump would soon be gone.

Or something.

The word is that he was planning on leaving the NSC after the impeachment but our petty president couldn't let him leave with his dignity, he needed to humiliate him. Remember how he fired Comey with maximum humiliation?

SMH

Military members don’t choose to leave their jobs. They have orders and assignments. Whatever “word” you have is wrong.

Listen more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhile the President says the military should look into disciplinary action against Lt. Col. Vindman

Vindman is subject to UCMJ.

Not for testifying he isn’t.

Vindman was certainly insubordinate, he is a known leaker, and an arrogant sh*t. But, he is very unlikely to be formally disciplined for his behavior. His rater, Mr. Morrison, has already given him a big slug in his OER (Officer Efficiency Report), so that will catch up with him. I’m not sure who serves as his convening authority, but the NSC will not prefer any charges against him. They have taken the proper action, dismissed him for improper conduct and he will receive an end of tour OER which likely will not be good.

The meaning of insubordinate is “defiant of authority; disobedient to orders.” and this guy was all that according to his commanding Officer. Keep in mind he declined to follow orders from the President and was telling others to ignore the orders because Trump would soon be gone.

So you ordered the code red? Goddam right I did says drumph

[Anonymous]

Former DC USA Jessie Liu, who just left and was replaced by one of Barr’s aides, was due for a Senate confirmation Hearing this week for a Treasury job. That nomination has been pulled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Former DC USA Jessie Liu, who just left and was replaced by one of Barr’s aides, was due for a Senate confirmation Hearing this week for a Treasury job. That nomination has been pulled.

Whoops link here. Guess Trump didn’t want her answering questions from Senators.
https://www.axios.com/trump-jessie-liu-treasury-us-attorney-838d1a3b-1d4d-414c-ac7d-77a7ba6d4edb.html

[Anonymous]

Average time served in prison for Rape in this country - 4 years.

Average time served in prison for Robbery in this country - 3 years.

Recommended time for Stone to serve in prison for a process crime - 9 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Average time served in prison for Rape in this country - 4 years.

Average time served in prison for Robbery in this country - 3 years.

Recommended time for Stone to serve in prison for a process crime - 9 years.

Yeah, we know you all think that all white collar crime is OK.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Average time served in prison for Rape in this country - 4 years.

Average time served in prison for Robbery in this country - 3 years.

Recommended time for Stone to serve in prison for a process crime - 9 years.

Process crime? What he did undermines the foundation of our justice system.

Now do the lady in Texas who voted and got 5 years.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Average time served in prison for Rape in this country - 4 years.

Average time served in prison for Robbery in this country - 3 years.

Recommended time for Stone to serve in prison for a process crime - 9 years.

Yeah, we know you all think that all white collar crime is OK.

Tell that to an elementary school classmate of mine who is in jail for 20 years for a bank ponzi scheme.

Tell that to Bernie Maddoff (who is the cell mate of my elementary school classmate in North Carolina).

Tell that to the father of my sons friend who is in jail for 25 years for a house flipping scheme.

Not saying Stone should be pardoned FWIW rather 9 years is excessive for a process crime.