Pelosi’s husband assaulted during breakin

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I said on another thread that the GOP is trying to get Democrats killed and someone said I was being over the top. I don’t think I’m being over the top; the GOP clearly thinks this is funny.

Well this is a quote from the Cheif of the Capitol Police that directly explains the threat we are facing as a country:

“In a statement Tuesday, Capitol Police Chief Tom Manger said that while there have been improvements — for instance, the department is on track to hire 280 additional officers this year — the country’s “political climate” is going to necessitate “additional layers of physical security.”

So if Trump and Republicans don’t intend to harm anyone then why do we need additional physical layers of security to protect Pelosi?

Re: the bolded. Ever stop to think that the political climate also refers to attitudes of Democrats?
You do realize that Republicans on the Hill face threats as well?

The only Republicans getting death threats are the Republicans deemed RINOs by MAGA. MAGA are really like terrorists.

Evidence proves this statement false. Sorry, pal.

What do you mean, sweetie-babe?

Here, honey babe.

C'mon. The guy left an angry voicemail. Not the same at all. Women politicians get multiples of these every day. Women of color have the highest rate of death threats and threats of sexual violence. Where's the outrage then? SMH.

I think there are at least two men in prison for similar threats just to AOC.

Good to hear. So, double the amount of Scott Lenox — to the pp who is claiming that Dems are equally responsible for violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:"If any of you are real, just stop for a min and ask yourself if this was an elderly man you knew attacked by someone because of his wife’s job, would you have sympathy for him? If so, please be a human being and extend that part of your humanity here."

Well said. The level of barbarism displayed in respond to an 82 year old man getting his skull cracked is nauseating. Whatever people think they are getting by engaging in this disgusting trolling they are losing far more in humanity and civility. If it was your dad or grandad or even your neighbor would you engage in this kind of sick banter?

Think back to nazi Germany. Did Nazis care when an elderly jew was beaten to death? A child? No. That is what you’re dealing with. People so radicalized and brainwashed that they view democrats, particularly those in power, as subhuman unworthy of sympathy.

And then there was the rest of the civilians who also became, at best, desensitized to the crimes against humanity, but in actuality supporters of it. That’s where anyone remaining supporting the GOP is at.

+3 And they’re gaslighting us for calling them what they are, while “moderates” pretend that it’s the labeling them that’s alienating them.

[Anonymous]

Released from the hospital per Pelosi’s office.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Released from the hospital per Pelosi’s office.

I hope Mr. Pelosi will be able to make a full recovery, and I hope his crazed, violent attacker never sees the outside of a prison or hospital again. Ever.

[Anonymous]

Just release the body cam footage and we can clear this up once and for all. Easy, peasy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just release the body cam footage and we can clear this up once and for all. Easy, peasy!

What do you need cleared up? What do you not believe?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just release the body cam footage and we can clear this up once and for all. Easy, peasy!

Are you that stupid?
What part of this don't you understand? It's a play-by-play of the accounting of what happened?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/details-emerge-paul-pelosi-attack-090058873.html

Why do you need to see body cam footage, like this is some CSI show? You aren't a CSI. You think you are better equipped than the professionals to assess what happened if you see it with your own eyes? No, you're not and you'll just find something else to poke fun at. You're grotesque that you want to see this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just release the body cam footage and we can clear this up once and for all. Easy, peasy!

Are you that stupid?
What part of this don't you understand? It's a play-by-play of the accounting of what happened?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/details-emerge-paul-pelosi-attack-090058873.html

Why do you need to see body cam footage, like this is some CSI show? You aren't a CSI. You think you are better equipped than the professionals to assess what happened if you see it with your own eyes? No, you're not and you'll just find something else to poke fun at. You're grotesque that you want to see this.

So body cam footage is only necessary when it fits your political narrative? Generally a picture is worth a thousand words.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just release the body cam footage and we can clear this up once and for all. Easy, peasy!

Are you that stupid?
What part of this don't you understand? It's a play-by-play of the accounting of what happened?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/details-emerge-paul-pelosi-attack-090058873.html

Why do you need to see body cam footage, like this is some CSI show? You aren't a CSI. You think you are better equipped than the professionals to assess what happened if you see it with your own eyes? No, you're not and you'll just find something else to poke fun at. You're grotesque that you want to see this.

So body cam footage is only necessary when it fits your political narrative? Generally a picture is worth a thousand words.

Whose political narrative? Why is body cam footage necessary for any lay person? Especially since the guy admitted it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just release the body cam footage and we can clear this up once and for all. Easy, peasy!

Are you that stupid?
What part of this don't you understand? It's a play-by-play of the accounting of what happened?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/details-emerge-paul-pelosi-attack-090058873.html

Why do you need to see body cam footage, like this is some CSI show? You aren't a CSI. You think you are better equipped than the professionals to assess what happened if you see it with your own eyes? No, you're not and you'll just find something else to poke fun at. You're grotesque that you want to see this.

So body cam footage is only necessary when it fits your political narrative? Generally a picture is worth a thousand words.

Whose political narrative? Why is body cam footage necessary for any lay person? Especially since the guy admitted it.

The MAGAs are just upset that the attacker confirmed the MAGAs were lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just release the body cam footage and we can clear this up once and for all. Easy, peasy!

Are you that stupid?
What part of this don't you understand? It's a play-by-play of the accounting of what happened?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/details-emerge-paul-pelosi-attack-090058873.html

Why do you need to see body cam footage, like this is some CSI show? You aren't a CSI. You think you are better equipped than the professionals to assess what happened if you see it with your own eyes? No, you're not and you'll just find something else to poke fun at. You're grotesque that you want to see this.

So body cam footage is only necessary when it fits your political narrative? Generally a picture is worth a thousand words.

Whose political narrative? Why is body cam footage necessary for any lay person? Especially since the guy admitted it.

The MAGAs are just upset that the attacker confirmed the MAGAs were lying.

The MAGAs don’t tend to believe the mentally ill.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just release the body cam footage and we can clear this up once and for all. Easy, peasy!

Are you that stupid?
What part of this don't you understand? It's a play-by-play of the accounting of what happened?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/details-emerge-paul-pelosi-attack-090058873.html

Why do you need to see body cam footage, like this is some CSI show? You aren't a CSI. You think you are better equipped than the professionals to assess what happened if you see it with your own eyes? No, you're not and you'll just find something else to poke fun at. You're grotesque that you want to see this.

So body cam footage is only necessary when it fits your political narrative? Generally a picture is worth a thousand words.

Whose political narrative? Why is body cam footage necessary for any lay person? Especially since the guy admitted it.

While we are at it, I would like to see the interrogation footage. Given his background, it very well could be he was not happy with government in general. To be a MAGA you have to support Trump. His friend stated that DePape had told him that he felt Trump was being used by establishment.

Who was DePape?

https://nypost.com/2022/10/29/pelosi-attacker-david-depape-was-psychotic-addict-estranged-from-pedophile-lover-kids/

“But DePape’s politics have little rhyme or reason. In past years DePape shared a post about Stephen Colbert’s 2006 roast of President George W. Bush at the White House Correspondents dinner; linked to videos of Disney films altered to make it look like the characters were swearing; and claimed, “Jesus is the anti-Christ” — not exactly a litany of right-wing tropes.”

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just release the body cam footage and we can clear this up once and for all. Easy, peasy!

Are you that stupid?
What part of this don't you understand? It's a play-by-play of the accounting of what happened?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/details-emerge-paul-pelosi-attack-090058873.html

Why do you need to see body cam footage, like this is some CSI show? You aren't a CSI. You think you are better equipped than the professionals to assess what happened if you see it with your own eyes? No, you're not and you'll just find something else to poke fun at. You're grotesque that you want to see this.

So body cam footage is only necessary when it fits your political narrative? Generally a picture is worth a thousand words.

Whose political narrative? Why is body cam footage necessary for any lay person? Especially since the guy admitted it.

While we are at it, I would like to see the interrogation footage. Given his background, it very well could be he was not happy with government in general. To be a MAGA you have to support Trump. His friend stated that DePape had told him that he felt Trump was being used by establishment.

Who was DePape?

https://nypost.com/2022/10/29/pelosi-attacker-david-depape-was-psychotic-addict-estranged-from-pedophile-lover-kids/

“But DePape’s politics have little rhyme or reason. In past years DePape shared a post about Stephen Colbert’s 2006 roast of President George W. Bush at the White House Correspondents dinner; linked to videos of Disney films altered to make it look like the characters were swearing; and claimed, “Jesus is the anti-Christ” — not exactly a litany of right-wing tropes.”

Initially MAGA's be like, no crime was committed.
Then MAGA's be like, well, the motivation is unclear.
Now MAGA's be like, not us!
So initially MAGAs were saying no crime was committed at all - just two gay lovers having a spat. Now that it's obvious to anyone with two brain cells that a crime was committed, the motivation has to be dissected. But all along they've confused whether a crime was committed with motivation for the crime committed. Be decent human beings and at least admit YOU WERE WRONG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Just release the body cam footage and we can clear this up once and for all. Easy, peasy!

Are you that stupid?
What part of this don't you understand? It's a play-by-play of the accounting of what happened?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/details-emerge-paul-pelosi-attack-090058873.html

Why do you need to see body cam footage, like this is some CSI show? You aren't a CSI. You think you are better equipped than the professionals to assess what happened if you see it with your own eyes? No, you're not and you'll just find something else to poke fun at. You're grotesque that you want to see this.

So body cam footage is only necessary when it fits your political narrative? Generally a picture is worth a thousand words.

I believe the family is going to get to see it soon or recently saw it. At the press conference I'm pretty sure DA Jenkins said the footage wouldn't be released publicly until the trial. It's one thing to release it when it's allowed, but it's quite another to hide it as part of a cover up. This doesn't sound like a cover up, considering the police, the victim, and the attempted murderer all agree to the basics. Of course, some people are going to lie regardless of what facts are provided, so it really doesn't matter what evidence you're provided with.