| Where is this notion coming from that neighborhood Key would be a Title I? ASFS isn’t current Title I, right? Was Key Title I when it had neighborhood preference? |
You can crunch the numbers...but it depends on if APS decides to concentrate FARMs at one school and what % of MC/UMC option out (or go Catholic). |
Yeah, this. A neighborhood Key will have roughly the demographics it does now. Not anything approaching Carlin Springs (81% fr/l). |
I have looked at the numbers, and I’m not seeing a realistic scenario where neighborhood Key is Title I. This feels like a scare tactic from the Keep Key on Key and Save McKinley folks to avoid having any schools move. |
|
Total scare tactic.
|
| What was the Key attendance area already sends 40% of their economically disadvantaged students to SF a Key neighborhood school will also include wealthy areas too and the split up of what is now Taylor and Long Branches attendance areas. I think with Key as a neighborhood school there’s a much better chance to balance the area and give all those schools similar demographics which isn’t possible currently. |
Yeah...umm where exactly does APS and the SB balance FARMs? What worries me are things like the 81 student transfers into ASFS from Taylor...what do you think is going to happen to them? |
Tiptoeing around the bullies only facilitates more bullying. Sometimes the bullies need to be put in their place. |
Probably a five or six. |
I am speaking for myself. Excuse me, but I'm also Title I schools all the way through. That's why I'm sick of our Title I schools being bashed - especially by north arlington parents whose kids have never stepped foot in one. |
I get it. I'm just sick of everyone making derogatory comments like their life would be over if their kid had to be in one. We know they're not the same; we don't need to constantly be reminded of it in rude, derogatory ways. Despite the differences, some of the teachers are the best and I'd put them up against north arlington teachers who don't have to/don't know how/can't handle the classrooms these teachers have to manage. |
Doubtful - they will be at much more affluent schools with many more resources. And moving immersion will allow others who do NOT have those things in their neighborhood schools to benefit. |
75% of DCUM posts are parents fearful their kids will have to attend a public school with poor brown kids |
No, they’re concerned about attending a school that is high poverty. Our high poverty schools are organized to help poor kids. That’s great. But they aren’t geared towards serving all students, and especially not affluent kids who are ahead of grade level thanks to years of high quality preschool, extracurriculars, and other parental enrichment. They don’t want their kids twiddling their thumbs, because let’s be honest, teachers aren’t multitaskers, individualized learning is a buzzword meant to replace tracking, which is actually feasible, and if one group of students is going to get most of the teachers time and attention, it should be the poor kids who are behind. |
Only weak minded individuals without a coherent point to make use the term “brown kids” and invent statistics. Few Arlington parents care about skin color. They care about schools that can maximize the resources that are funneled to their own kids. Period. |