Spare

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Duke of Sussex wrote that Meghan “laughed and rolled her eyes” after he “took several slow, penetrating hits” of laughing gas when she was in labor with son Archie in 2019. He subsequently joined his wife as she bounced on a giant purple ball. When the nurse tried to administer the laughing gas to Meghan as her contractions continued, Harry wrote “there was none left” for the actress.


Okay, perhaps the rumours that this book is a spoof and the leak is all marketing are true....these stories can't be the actual book.

JFC someone save these people from themselves.

If these excerpts are fake, its just another reason to dislike these people even more.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
2) Meghan was never cut out to be an obedient princess. She was/is a nice but ambitious and hard working woman with a vision of what she wants out of life, a clear feeling about what she believes is wrong and right, and an unwillingness to compromise herself entirely for anything or anyone. And in the end, this clashed with the institution and doomed her. She was never going to not fight back. And if you admire that quality overall you support her, and if you think she should have been thanking the gods for landing her a prince and keeping her mouth shut as she enjoyed the trappings of the royal life than you hate her.

Meghan thought that the whole institution of the BRF should be bent to suit her because she's so special. And when it didn't, she cried. She was fighting back against what she perceived as slights, but is in fact just reality: you, Meghan, are NOT as important as Kate, because hierarchy. And this hierarchy will not change based on how fabulous or glamorous or popular you are. That's why they get priceless art and you get IKEA. Both of you live in places you do not own and never will.

I mean I think your read is incredibly oversimplified and reduces her to a caricature of a human being. I think any American introduced so abruptly into the institution would struggle greatly. Kate spend YEARS going through royal training while dating and breaking up with Will to be able to tolerate all the indignities with grace and a smile. She was literally being groomed since childhood for it. All of the british royals are, and they're all pretty screwed up!

Meghan had a difficult time with it but the real difference between her and the rest of them is that she just hadn't been taught to suppress it, smile and not talk about it or show it in any way shape or form no matter what anyone does or says to you. And I say that with EMPATHY for Kate Middleton and Diana Spencer and Camilla and Fergie and Beatrice and Eugenie and Margaret and Anne. It is a brutal world, gilded, but brutal.

But Meghan HAD been offered advice and mentorship on the Windsor way, and she declined. It's not like she was thrown into it headfirst, she chose to dive in despite warnings. Don't you think it's a special kind of arrogance to think you already know all there is to be known, and you know better?

Some of Harry's girlfriends were able to figure out in their early twenties while dating him what life in the RF would be like and decide to not go for it. Meghan was older, wiser, and had just as many resources as her disposal. She planned to do things her way so she had no need for any insights from the RF.

I just don't believe that someone like Meghan - who friendly reporters describe as very thoughtful, always planning, researching, reading and preparing - came to the BRF as tabula rasa. Chances are, she either thought none of that applied to her, or that she'd be invited to revolutionize the place.

Yup. No one is buying innocent young naive maiden story. She is an educated, mature, divorced, professional women with high ambition.

Her PR is that she was an innocent “young mother,” (so weird that Meg’s pregnancies were classed as geriatric like a mortal 40 year old) and her graveside seance to reach Diana in front of her low IQ son is just the pitch-perfect turd atop her sundae of lies. She had her babies at and after the age where Diana was being driven through a tunnel in Paris, but that’s context they and their totally smart fans can’t quite accept.

Its much easier to worship a dead mother-in-law then getting along with an alive one.

[Anonymous]

The ghostwriter is a journalist / author who has been on the scene for 30 years, and won awards and had Hollywood movies made of at least one of his books. He ghostwrote Phil King's (founder of Nike) memoir. He is a respected author.

Would he really write a book about Harry losing his v card to a horsewoman in a pasture, getting frostbite on his penis, wetting himself, singing to seals, stealing laughing gas during labour, sharing lip gloss, buying Ikea furniture etc


Something is off here....I think we are being trolled!

[Anonymous]

I was team Harry but if this is all truly in the book……wow. Straight up weirdos. Them and both their families. I hope this is a game they are playing on the tabloids to burn them. Please. This insanity can’t be really in the book.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The ghostwriter is a journalist / author who has been on the scene for 30 years, and won awards and had Hollywood movies made of at least one of his books. He ghostwrote Phil King's (founder of Nike) memoir. He is a respected author.

Would he really write a book about Harry losing his v card to a horsewoman in a pasture, getting frostbite on his penis, wetting himself, singing to seals, stealing laughing gas during labour, sharing lip gloss, buying Ikea furniture etc


Something is off here....I think we are being trolled!

Isn’t it possible he was overruled? Someone posted a page or 3 ago that the ghostwriter liked and retweeted a comment criticizing the inclusion of the Taliban information in the book as repellant and irresponsible. Sometimes a check is a check. Isn’t it possible Tweedledumb and Mommy Wife insisted on this fifth or sixth retelling of Their I Mean Harry’s story and Penguin saw dollar signs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I was team Harry but if this is all truly in the book……wow. Straight up weirdos. Them and both their families. I hope this is a game they are playing on the tabloids to burn them. Please. This insanity can’t be really in the book.

How is any of this the fault of their families? The couple are the liars. That’s why the discussion has been a post-mortem fact check.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Jealous and disgruntled spares over the history have often killed or tried to kill their heir siblings, he is only ruining him in public opinion.

\

Hilarious!

My husband's reaction to the news about the fight was, "They're brothers, of course they have fights. I had worse-sounding fights with my brother and we get along fine."

Mine said the exact same thing -- brothers get in fights, even in their 30s and 40s!

But but but did one of them fall on a dog bowl and feel pain from shards?

Accidents happen when people shove each other in anger.

[Anonymous]

Harry appears to be extremely dim-witted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ghostwriter is a journalist / author who has been on the scene for 30 years, and won awards and had Hollywood movies made of at least one of his books. He ghostwrote Phil King's (founder of Nike) memoir. He is a respected author.

Would he really write a book about Harry losing his v card to a horsewoman in a pasture, getting frostbite on his penis, wetting himself, singing to seals, stealing laughing gas during labour, sharing lip gloss, buying Ikea furniture etc


Something is off here....I think we are being trolled!

Isn’t it possible he was overruled? Someone posted a page or 3 ago that the ghostwriter liked and retweeted a comment criticizing the inclusion of the Taliban information in the book as repellant and irresponsible. Sometimes a check is a check. Isn’t it possible Tweedledumb and Mommy Wife insisted on this fifth or sixth retelling of Their I Mean Harry’s story and Penguin saw dollar signs?

I think the ghostwriter just creates the main draft based on the interviews and documents from the person. I would image Harry and the editor work on the final version. I don't know if the ghostwriter gets any final say on what is or isn't in the book. I am sure more could be added in after the draft was received from the ghostwriter. I don't know who has rights to what decisions in a book like this.

I would think they would have a lawyer read it over before okaying it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Harry appears to be extremely dim-witted.

If these excerpts are authentic, distressingly so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate being uptight sounds about right. So was QE2 — I think it’s the best way to survive that grinder. Diana was not cold and uptight enough — it ate her alive. Fergie was famously warm and bubbly and she was a basic disaster.
I think a bit part of Megan’s problem is that she thought she could portray this warm open persona and then close that door for privacy. It doesn’t work that way there. It reminds me of the queens advice to someone — never hold hands in public because the first time you aren’t holding hands, they will make it headline news. They will use whatever you give them so give them nothing to work with except bland propriety.

But she and Harry have been calculating and taking notes and seeking to take down and destroy these people over petty grievances. That doesn't sound like a genuine open warm person.

Making videos, taking notes etc sounds like this union was a pre planned business project.

Is it possible they were told to do this for royal historians/posterity or even for media use to the benefit of the royal family and their image?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kate being uptight sounds about right. So was QE2 — I think it’s the best way to survive that grinder. Diana was not cold and uptight enough — it ate her alive. Fergie was famously warm and bubbly and she was a basic disaster.
I think a bit part of Megan’s problem is that she thought she could portray this warm open persona and then close that door for privacy. It doesn’t work that way there. It reminds me of the queens advice to someone — never hold hands in public because the first time you aren’t holding hands, they will make it headline news. They will use whatever you give them so give them nothing to work with except bland propriety.

But she and Harry have been calculating and taking notes and seeking to take down and destroy these people over petty grievances. That doesn't sound like a genuine open warm person.

Making videos, taking notes etc sounds like this union was a pre planned business project.

Is it possible they were told to do this for royal historians/posterity or even for media use to the benefit of the royal family and their image?

lol no

[Anonymous]

This is British morning TV trying to talk about the book

https://twitter.com/carolvorders/status/1611388434114912259

[Anonymous]

This book is my favorite thing ever. It’s the gift that keeps giving.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is British morning TV trying to talk about the book

https://twitter.com/carolvorders/status/1611388434114912259

Thank you -- hilarious!