Spare

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The royal life sounds perfectly ghastly, which is why Chelsy and Cressida had the good sense to run away.

Chelsy and Cressida are rich heiresses, they had better options. It was not the Royal life, it was Harrold, he was an ass to both women.

IDK. Will also was keen to marry a blonde aristochick and dumped Kate multiple times to try to get with them, but they didn't want a Royal life and yes, had other options. Both boys were basically going to have to marry commoners who viewed the marriage as a big step up. I don't see Harrold as being an ass unless you apply the same to William who was roundly rejected.

He finally "did the right thing" after being told to shit or get off the pot.

There is zero comparison between a relationship over a decade between two same aged people who met at 20 and a quick let’s get mawwied relationship between a no-college-cheat halfwit and frigging late 30s divorcee. Try again.

Why are you and others bent on the non-college degree talking point. Is this the same DCUM crowd who constantly post in the college Dorothy’s every person should not attend college, and Trade schools pay better than non-stem college attendees. Now you guys are using it as an insult. His trade was the royal institution. Now his trade is invictus and writing memoirs. Obviously he did not need to go to college to make money doing either. And BTW, if you are thirty-five and older and you need more than a year to decide that you want to marry or walk away, something is wrong with you. You should know yourself by that age. You’re no spring chicken.

Yeah, b/c Harry was a real Thiel Fellow.

It's not just the fact that he didn't go to college., it's that he's super dumb.

What do you have to show for your so-called smarts? $100 million Netflix deals, $20 million book deal plus royalties and more on the way . Not bad for a dumb dude. By the way, can you point who's conventionally smart in that family? Please don't talk to me about his brother and his degree in geography or, his father with his history, archeology and anthropology nonsense .

Remove his link to the BRF and what is left?

Remove any of their links to the BRF and what is left? I’m waiting.

No one else is claiming to want to break free from the BRF while making money on it.

H&M’s problem is that with all that they claim to have, their link to the BRF is STILL the most interesting thing about them. The difference in how their two documentaries performed is clear evidence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The royal life sounds perfectly ghastly, which is why Chelsy and Cressida had the good sense to run away.

Chelsy and Cressida are rich heiresses, they had better options. It was not the Royal life, it was Harrold, he was an ass to both women.

IDK. Will also was keen to marry a blonde aristochick and dumped Kate multiple times to try to get with them, but they didn't want a Royal life and yes, had other options. Both boys were basically going to have to marry commoners who viewed the marriage as a big step up. I don't see Harrold as being an ass unless you apply the same to William who was roundly rejected.

He finally "did the right thing" after being told to shit or get off the pot.

There is zero comparison between a relationship over a decade between two same aged people who met at 20 and a quick let’s get mawwied relationship between a no-college-cheat halfwit and frigging late 30s divorcee. Try again.

Why are you and others bent on the non-college degree talking point. Is this the same DCUM crowd who constantly post in the college Dorothy’s every person should not attend college, and Trade schools pay better than non-stem college attendees. Now you guys are using it as an insult. His trade was the royal institution. Now his trade is invictus and writing memoirs. Obviously he did not need to go to college to make money doing either. And BTW, if you are thirty-five and older and you need more than a year to decide that you want to marry or walk away, something is wrong with you. You should know yourself by that age. You’re no spring chicken.

Yeah, b/c Harry was a real Thiel Fellow.

It's not just the fact that he didn't go to college., it's that he's super dumb.

What do you have to show for your so-called smarts? $100 million Netflix deals, $20 million book deal plus royalties and more on the way . Not bad for a dumb dude. By the way, can you point who's conventionally smart in that family? Please don't talk to me about his brother and his degree in geography or, his father with his history, archeology and anthropology nonsense .

Remove his link to the BRF and what is left?

You first, remove your links to whiteness and let's see how much easier life gets for you .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11602551/Prince-Harrys-book-William-pointed-finger-Meghan-called-rude.html
I hope Spare is clearer than this DailyMail article. Meghan makes a comment about hormones that sets Kate off at the bridal salon, but then somehow (at a different point in time?) William shows up and waves a finger in her face and that makes Meghan cry?

The way I read this is that there was a confrontation after the bridal salon exchange.

Man if someone I barely knew told me I had "baby brain" I would be LIVID. Is anyone else seeing this as William defending his wife?

Yeah, but I thought there was crying during the bridal salon exchange, so I guess I'm just not understanding the sequence. Anyway, I can see how some people would get pissed at that kind of offhand remark being made, especially Kate with her tough pregnancies. But many many many others would just laugh it off.

yeah. i joke about mommy brain and baby brain with my friends (who are also mothers). it's definitely not up there with the worst things you could say to an in-law.

Not the worst thing. But it can be used as an insult. And getting a finger wag in response seems appropriate.

Not a great relationship among in-laws. But not the worst. Or at least not then - now it is. SMH

How could the money and revenge possibly have been worth the end of your relationship with your only brother? I don't care how much you resented being "the spare," it is simply not worth it.

What did Harry actually want of William? To change their birth order? In every aspect of life (like it or not), there is a hierarchy.

I think he wanted his family/the institution to protect him in the same way William was protected. It's an understandable desire, if not realistic.

Of course he didn't want to "change the birth order." God, I don't think he envies William in any way and barely tolerated his royal duties, given what happened to his mother. And after finding other things that gave him more happiness: his military service, his philanthropies, and now his wife/kids. He absolutely expected his brother and father to protect his family and they didn't, going as far to remove their security detail once they decided to step away. Were they entitled to pull it back? Sure. But it makes them look petty and vindictive, and left them open to security breaches. Jesus, Tyler Perry had to step in to help them when their own family couldn't be magnanimous enough to keep them safe. It's absolutely grotesque.

While there are not doubt different recollections on the two sides re: some of the details, I 100000% believe Harry and Meghan. There are plenty of examples of hideous behavior by the Royal family to know what they are saying is true. Good for them for stepping away. Protecting their family. And of not longer sitting back and being the punching bags and telling their side.

H&M could have stayed in England (even as non-working Royals) and lived at Frogmore House and had security. They chose to move to the US, out of the jurisdiction of the British government. If they didn’t think through the consequences of that, that’s on them. They said they wanted to be independent and make their own way (except for the titles, and the police protection, and the Royal family sticking up for them in the press…). Choices have consequences.

Well, they're making more money now than in Britain. So, yeah! You're right, choices have consequences .

Security alone was worth more than they have made by cashing in all their cards.

Yet at some point, had they stayed, their financial well-being, possibly where they lived, and legal custody of their children would have been in William’s hands. That’s reason enough for leaving while they still had multiple options for making money — and possibly better options for the well-being of their kids.

This nonsense was floated as a justification for Meghan to take Archie and run. It was nonsense then and it's nonsense now.

Also, Beatrice and Eugenie may not have everything they desire but they are doing just fine. "Better option for the well-being of their kids"? Being raised as the idle rich in California is healthier for them than being raised in England among family? I suppose anything is possible.

Blood does not make one family. Blood relatives can be toxic. Sometimes it’s best to disconnect and make your own family. Isn’t that’s what is touted in the relationship section of DCUM and self-help forums.

Your entire family on all sides except for one mother?

Well most people only have one mother, so there’s that. She is very close to her niece from her father’s side. The niece was in the Netflix documentary. The institution would not allow or highly discouraged Meghan to disinvite the niece because Meghan would not invite Samantha, the niece’s bio-mom. And Meghan’s mom was raised an only child, so I guess there are no cousins to speak of from that side. That’s not uncommon for onlies who then only have an onlie.

How do we know this to be true? Because Meghan said so? She has lied before so why should we believe her?

Okay Rupert, it’s obvious you are set in your ways. Both the niece and Meghan mentioned it in the documentary you chose not to watch. The niece was initially invited, but once Samantha started in on H&M the institution told Meghan it would cause lots of problems and questions to invite the daughter but not the daughter’s mother to the wedding. She was instructed to disinvite the niece. The niece stated she was upset when she received Meghan’s call, especially when she had no dealings or relationship with her bio-mom. The two of them mended their rift when Meghan moved back to California.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The royal life sounds perfectly ghastly, which is why Chelsy and Cressida had the good sense to run away.

Chelsy and Cressida are rich heiresses, they had better options. It was not the Royal life, it was Harrold, he was an ass to both women.

IDK. Will also was keen to marry a blonde aristochick and dumped Kate multiple times to try to get with them, but they didn't want a Royal life and yes, had other options. Both boys were basically going to have to marry commoners who viewed the marriage as a big step up. I don't see Harrold as being an ass unless you apply the same to William who was roundly rejected.

He finally "did the right thing" after being told to shit or get off the pot.

There is zero comparison between a relationship over a decade between two same aged people who met at 20 and a quick let’s get mawwied relationship between a no-college-cheat halfwit and frigging late 30s divorcee. Try again.

Why are you and others bent on the non-college degree talking point. Is this the same DCUM crowd who constantly post in the college Dorothy’s every person should not attend college, and Trade schools pay better than non-stem college attendees. Now you guys are using it as an insult. His trade was the royal institution. Now his trade is invictus and writing memoirs. Obviously he did not need to go to college to make money doing either. And BTW, if you are thirty-five and older and you need more than a year to decide that you want to marry or walk away, something is wrong with you. You should know yourself by that age. You’re no spring chicken.

Yeah, b/c Harry was a real Thiel Fellow.

It's not just the fact that he didn't go to college., it's that he's super dumb.

What do you have to show for your so-called smarts? $100 million Netflix deals, $20 million book deal plus royalties and more on the way . Not bad for a dumb dude. By the way, can you point who's conventionally smart in that family? Please don't talk to me about his brother and his degree in geography or, his father with his history, archeology and anthropology nonsense .

Remove his link to the BRF and what is left?

You first, remove your links to whiteness and let's see how much easier life gets for you .

Time for Jeff to shut this thread down.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11602551/Prince-Harrys-book-William-pointed-finger-Meghan-called-rude.html
I hope Spare is clearer than this DailyMail article. Meghan makes a comment about hormones that sets Kate off at the bridal salon, but then somehow (at a different point in time?) William shows up and waves a finger in her face and that makes Meghan cry?

The way I read this is that there was a confrontation after the bridal salon exchange.

Man if someone I barely knew told me I had "baby brain" I would be LIVID. Is anyone else seeing this as William defending his wife?

Yeah, but I thought there was crying during the bridal salon exchange, so I guess I'm just not understanding the sequence. Anyway, I can see how some people would get pissed at that kind of offhand remark being made, especially Kate with her tough pregnancies. But many many many others would just laugh it off.

yeah. i joke about mommy brain and baby brain with my friends (who are also mothers). it's definitely not up there with the worst things you could say to an in-law.

Not the worst thing. But it can be used as an insult. And getting a finger wag in response seems appropriate.

Not a great relationship among in-laws. But not the worst. Or at least not then - now it is. SMH

How could the money and revenge possibly have been worth the end of your relationship with your only brother? I don't care how much you resented being "the spare," it is simply not worth it.

What did Harry actually want of William? To change their birth order? In every aspect of life (like it or not), there is a hierarchy.

I think he wanted his family/the institution to protect him in the same way William was protected. It's an understandable desire, if not realistic.

Of course he didn't want to "change the birth order." God, I don't think he envies William in any way and barely tolerated his royal duties, given what happened to his mother. And after finding other things that gave him more happiness: his military service, his philanthropies, and now his wife/kids. He absolutely expected his brother and father to protect his family and they didn't, going as far to remove their security detail once they decided to step away. Were they entitled to pull it back? Sure. But it makes them look petty and vindictive, and left them open to security breaches. Jesus, Tyler Perry had to step in to help them when their own family couldn't be magnanimous enough to keep them safe. It's absolutely grotesque.

While there are not doubt different recollections on the two sides re: some of the details, I 100000% believe Harry and Meghan. There are plenty of examples of hideous behavior by the Royal family to know what they are saying is true. Good for them for stepping away. Protecting their family. And of not longer sitting back and being the punching bags and telling their side.

H&M could have stayed in England (even as non-working Royals) and lived at Frogmore House and had security. They chose to move to the US, out of the jurisdiction of the British government. If they didn’t think through the consequences of that, that’s on them. They said they wanted to be independent and make their own way (except for the titles, and the police protection, and the Royal family sticking up for them in the press…). Choices have consequences.

Well, they're making more money now than in Britain. So, yeah! You're right, choices have consequences .

Security alone was worth more than they have made by cashing in all their cards.

Yet at some point, had they stayed, their financial well-being, possibly where they lived, and legal custody of their children would have been in William’s hands. That’s reason enough for leaving while they still had multiple options for making money — and possibly better options for the well-being of their kids.

This nonsense was floated as a justification for Meghan to take Archie and run. It was nonsense then and it's nonsense now.

Also, Beatrice and Eugenie may not have everything they desire but they are doing just fine. "Better option for the well-being of their kids"? Being raised as the idle rich in California is healthier for them than being raised in England among family? I suppose anything is possible.

Blood does not make one family. Blood relatives can be toxic. Sometimes it’s best to disconnect and make your own family. Isn’t that’s what is touted in the relationship section of DCUM and self-help forums.

Your entire family on all sides except for one mother?

Well most people only have one mother, so there’s that. She is very close to her niece from her father’s side. The niece was in the Netflix documentary. The institution would not allow or highly discouraged Meghan to disinvite the niece because Meghan would not invite Samantha, the niece’s bio-mom. And Meghan’s mom was raised an only child, so I guess there are no cousins to speak of from that side. That’s not uncommon for onlies who then only have an onlie.

Yes, most people have one mother. Most people also have at least a fairly close or loving relationship with someone -- from both sides of their family-- other than just one parent. Glad she also is close to a niece. That makes two family members.

And that’s more than a lot of people have. It’s not that hard to understand if you come from a small family. People with large extended families just cannot wrap their heads around small nuclear families. Yet, I guarantee even in those large families, there are family members that do not speak to one another, especially after the matriarch dies.

Please. Many families are small, yet family members connect with and maintain relationships with more than 2 people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The royal life sounds perfectly ghastly, which is why Chelsy and Cressida had the good sense to run away.

Chelsy and Cressida are rich heiresses, they had better options. It was not the Royal life, it was Harrold, he was an ass to both women.

IDK. Will also was keen to marry a blonde aristochick and dumped Kate multiple times to try to get with them, but they didn't want a Royal life and yes, had other options. Both boys were basically going to have to marry commoners who viewed the marriage as a big step up. I don't see Harrold as being an ass unless you apply the same to William who was roundly rejected.

He finally "did the right thing" after being told to shit or get off the pot.

There is zero comparison between a relationship over a decade between two same aged people who met at 20 and a quick let’s get mawwied relationship between a no-college-cheat halfwit and frigging late 30s divorcee. Try again.

Why are you and others bent on the non-college degree talking point. Is this the same DCUM crowd who constantly post in the college Dorothy’s every person should not attend college, and Trade schools pay better than non-stem college attendees. Now you guys are using it as an insult. His trade was the royal institution. Now his trade is invictus and writing memoirs. Obviously he did not need to go to college to make money doing either. And BTW, if you are thirty-five and older and you need more than a year to decide that you want to marry or walk away, something is wrong with you. You should know yourself by that age. You’re no spring chicken.

Yeah, b/c Harry was a real Thiel Fellow.

It's not just the fact that he didn't go to college., it's that he's super dumb.

What do you have to show for your so-called smarts? $100 million Netflix deals, $20 million book deal plus royalties and more on the way . Not bad for a dumb dude. By the way, can you point who's conventionally smart in that family? Please don't talk to me about his brother and his degree in geography or, his father with his history, archeology and anthropology nonsense .

Remove his link to the BRF and what is left?

You first, remove your links to whiteness and let's see how much easier life gets for you .

?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you are in your mid 30's, have an education and a career, had a difficult life, had been abandoned by family, divorced by husband and experienced hypocrisy of Hollywood, why wouldn't you do some research and take time to understand a potential husband and his family?

Meghan initiated the divorce, as well as the break up with the guy she was living with when she first connected with H.

Another lie from the British tabloids. According to Meghan’s girlfriends they were trying to get Meghan to go out and date. They were going to spend the summer traveling during gurl things. Meghan was set up with Harry via blind date. How is she going to spend the summer traveling with her girlfriends if she is living with a significant other. And why would her friends be interested in finding her dates if she is living with a SO. These are words from her multiple girlfriends mouths, not a rag tabloid interested in selling copies.

Of course she would put this story out there through her gf to cover up her scurrilous ways.

She was still living with Corey when she started linking up with Harry.

Even your post shows how much they obfuscate. You say there were set up via a blind date, yet the Netflix doc says they met on Instagram .

They lie. All the time.

I’ve not read or heard Corey say this. But hey, we know you believe all of Rupert Murdoch’s trashy gossip rags.

Corey ain't touching this with a ten foot pole. Meg and Harry have repeatedly changed the story on when they first met/started dating because there was a clear overlap with Corey in the initial story, as evidenced by some of Meg's social media behavior.

Harry couldn't even see where Meg lived on their beginning dates because she was still living with Corey. He stayed a "friends" places in Canada.

Meg better hope Jessica Mulroney keeps her mouth shut.

So if nobody is talking, you know all this how exactly? LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11602551/Prince-Harrys-book-William-pointed-finger-Meghan-called-rude.html
I hope Spare is clearer than this DailyMail article. Meghan makes a comment about hormones that sets Kate off at the bridal salon, but then somehow (at a different point in time?) William shows up and waves a finger in her face and that makes Meghan cry?

The way I read this is that there was a confrontation after the bridal salon exchange.

Man if someone I barely knew told me I had "baby brain" I would be LIVID. Is anyone else seeing this as William defending his wife?

Yeah, but I thought there was crying during the bridal salon exchange, so I guess I'm just not understanding the sequence. Anyway, I can see how some people would get pissed at that kind of offhand remark being made, especially Kate with her tough pregnancies. But many many many others would just laugh it off.

yeah. i joke about mommy brain and baby brain with my friends (who are also mothers). it's definitely not up there with the worst things you could say to an in-law.

Not the worst thing. But it can be used as an insult. And getting a finger wag in response seems appropriate.

Not a great relationship among in-laws. But not the worst. Or at least not then - now it is. SMH

How could the money and revenge possibly have been worth the end of your relationship with your only brother? I don't care how much you resented being "the spare," it is simply not worth it.

What did Harry actually want of William? To change their birth order? In every aspect of life (like it or not), there is a hierarchy.

I think he wanted his family/the institution to protect him in the same way William was protected. It's an understandable desire, if not realistic.

Of course he didn't want to "change the birth order." God, I don't think he envies William in any way and barely tolerated his royal duties, given what happened to his mother. And after finding other things that gave him more happiness: his military service, his philanthropies, and now his wife/kids. He absolutely expected his brother and father to protect his family and they didn't, going as far to remove their security detail once they decided to step away. Were they entitled to pull it back? Sure. But it makes them look petty and vindictive, and left them open to security breaches. Jesus, Tyler Perry had to step in to help them when their own family couldn't be magnanimous enough to keep them safe. It's absolutely grotesque.

While there are not doubt different recollections on the two sides re: some of the details, I 100000% believe Harry and Meghan. There are plenty of examples of hideous behavior by the Royal family to know what they are saying is true. Good for them for stepping away. Protecting their family. And of not longer sitting back and being the punching bags and telling their side.

H&M could have stayed in England (even as non-working Royals) and lived at Frogmore House and had security. They chose to move to the US, out of the jurisdiction of the British government. If they didn’t think through the consequences of that, that’s on them. They said they wanted to be independent and make their own way (except for the titles, and the police protection, and the Royal family sticking up for them in the press…). Choices have consequences.

Well, they're making more money now than in Britain. So, yeah! You're right, choices have consequences .

Security alone was worth more than they have made by cashing in all their cards.

Yet at some point, had they stayed, their financial well-being, possibly where they lived, and legal custody of their children would have been in William’s hands. That’s reason enough for leaving while they still had multiple options for making money — and possibly better options for the well-being of their kids.

This nonsense was floated as a justification for Meghan to take Archie and run. It was nonsense then and it's nonsense now.

Also, Beatrice and Eugenie may not have everything they desire but they are doing just fine. "Better option for the well-being of their kids"? Being raised as the idle rich in California is healthier for them than being raised in England among family? I suppose anything is possible.

Blood does not make one family. Blood relatives can be toxic. Sometimes it’s best to disconnect and make your own family. Isn’t that’s what is touted in the relationship section of DCUM and self-help forums.

Your entire family on all sides except for one mother?

Well most people only have one mother, so there’s that. She is very close to her niece from her father’s side. The niece was in the Netflix documentary. The institution would not allow or highly discouraged Meghan to disinvite the niece because Meghan would not invite Samantha, the niece’s bio-mom. And Meghan’s mom was raised an only child, so I guess there are no cousins to speak of from that side. That’s not uncommon for onlies who then only have an onlie.

How do we know this to be true? Because Meghan said so? She has lied before so why should we believe her?

Okay Rupert, it’s obvious you are set in your ways. Both the niece and Meghan mentioned it in the documentary you chose not to watch. The niece was initially invited, but once Samantha started in on H&M the institution told Meghan it would cause lots of problems and questions to invite the daughter but not the daughter’s mother to the wedding. She was instructed to disinvite the niece. The niece stated she was upset when she received Meghan’s call, especially when she had no dealings or relationship with her bio-mom. The two of them mended their rift when Meghan moved back to California.

The royal sources disputed this account, fyi.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's sad is that with all this nonsense talk about independent life, it surely must burn H&M that their connection to the BRF is STILL the most interesting thing about them.

Netflix doc about their dramas? Sells like hotcakes.

Leadership something doc they "produced"? Didn't even register.

That tells you what people want from H&M. Not their ideas!

It's only the most interesting thing to people on here discussing it, and who know little else about them. Lots of people love them for lots of reasons, including their philanthropic work. Meghan def has a very close cadre of friends who are very protective of her and love her very much.

What else is there to know? Remove their connection to the BRF and do you think they would stand out in the sea of philanthropy?

Well Meghan was philanthropic prior to knowing and dating Harry. Actually received recognition from the UN on her charity work. Just because she was unknown to you does not mean she was unknown to others.

She wasn't a standout. No one knew her. I've probably spoken at more UN events than she had at that point, I just don't go about trying to curate a brand around it. You need money and/or status to be a standout philanthropist and she had neither.

She is relevant now entirely because of the racist, imperialist institution she is hellbent on destroying.

Even after having the post-royal family platform, their "Live to Lead" doc on Netflix tanked. Nobody cares about them apart from royal family drama and gossip.

Are you a standout ? Better yet, why aren't you a standout ? You could start by exiting thus thread IF you don't care about them .

Exactly. When I read that post, I simply rolled my eyes. What is that poster’s relevancy. Nada.

That's the point, genius! It's not relevant. That kind of crap is a dime a dozen in DC. You're acting like she was some big deal before she me Harry. She wasn't!

My goodness, the comprehension is off the charts in here today.

The only thing I comprehend from your posts are you are full of jelly. So unbecoming to attempt to diminish others accomplishments by throwing your unverifiable stats out there.