
[twitter]
|
|
You can stop worrying, then since TJ is over 60% Asian. In fact, Asians are faring better than any other demographic group. |
Let’s make sure we don’t forget that the largest beneficiary group of the admissions changes were poor Asian students. By a WIDE margin. |
I guess those are the wrong kinds of Asians. |
Independent research has backed this up. 36 Asian students who were admitted received bonus points for economic disadvantage. That was the largest group of students admitted to receive any of the “experience factor” points. No other group received more than 15 in any area. |
It was never really about discrimination. That's completely laughable looking at the school's demographics. It was always about maintaining a process that could be easily gamed through outside enrichment so that it favored the wealthy. |
In the mean time, at least 360 qualified Asian applicants were excluded. Learn to do some basic math. |
Don't hatae the players, hate the game. |
Qualified students are excluded from every application and test in school in the world every year. There aren't enough seats in the classroom for everyone you think is "qualified." That's life. Why is that so hard to understand? And isn't it wonderful that a great education can be obtained in many different places such that it actually doesn't matter which school you attend? Grow where you are planted. Any kid as bright at you say they are will be able to excel anywhere. This is also true of preschools and colleges. |
Yes |
The other notion I object to is qualified according to who? Certainly not the committee that made a selection. They picked the applicants who they believed were most qualified. Sure, some privileged kids may score higher than kids in a low-income school, but that doesn't mean they're more qualified or deserving. I'm more impressed with kids who are succeeding in spite of the obstacles they face than a few kids who had every possible advantage and still weren't able to rise to the top of their school. |
DP - this is important. Many parents in this area believe that TJ admissions is ultimately a reward for the hard work of the family in optimizing their child's application - this is why on many Facebook posts within one specific community (more granular than just "Asians") you will see the parents congratulated rather than the child. It's kind of gross to watch, honestly. More than anything, I see the admissions changes as an attempt to mitigate the influence of parents who are hyper-focused on TJ as an outcome - and when I see which parents are the ones yelling and screaming about their convoluted definition of "merit", it seems to me that it's working exactly according to plan. If all goes well, hopefully we'll see parent behaviors start to change as over-advancement in math, a narrow focus on STEM extracurriculars at too-early ages, and standardized exam prep are disincentivized by the new process. Perhaps those families will indeed find somewhere else to take their kids, which would be a huge win across the board for the region. |
Absolutely hit the nail on the head +10000 |
My family is Korean-American and this poster is spot on. I’m tired of us getting lumped in to this broad “Asian” category when everyone knows what is actually happening under the surface. Families like mine have been in America for multiple generations (I grew up in Annandale) and this is the case for most of the East and Southeast Asian families that are in this area. We raise our children to understand the value of a great education just like our parents did for us, but we do not equate that with prestige or try to box anyone else out using our resources. It sickens me when I see people like Nomani and Dutta and Jackson and Miller claiming to stand up for “Asians”. You don’t stand up for Asians - you stand up for a small group of well-resourced Asians who are conflating privilege with merit. And you’re evil and disgusting for claiming that you represent us. We deserve better than you. |