Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These text exchanges just don’t sound the way 22-year-old gamers communicate. Feels off, as if from a fiction writer:

“I had enough of his hatred,” Robinson texted, referring to Charlie Kirk. “Some hate can’t be negotiated out.”

The partner responded with shock, according to a law enforcement reproduction of the text message exchange. “You weren’t the one who did it right????” the partner texted. Robinson responded: “I am, I’m sorry.”

(Copied from NYT)

Lol no 22 gamer talks like that. Sounds like some boomer cosplaying

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tyler Robinson is such a perfect metaphor for America.

Both were once a smart, promising kid with a bright future. Maybe a little bit too in love with guns. Then they dropped out of the world, went down an internet rabbit hole, and became deranged.

Ok keep on perpetuating this utter ridiculous false story.

What’s false about it?

These are the facts imo
1. MAGA conveniently making trans/gay culture a scapegoat
2. The fact that Tyler Robinson is likely not left leaning
3. Tyler and Lance were fans of Kirk
4. They were cybersecurity hackers
5. This was done by forces trying to divide America society

This was an act done by a kid who was extremely online, raised with weapons of war.
There is zero evidence that he was in a conspiracy with Lance or that they were hackers. Stop watching black mirror.

True, I feel like our response should be more focused on the role social media plays in the development of these mass shooters- it’s a common denominator, and clearly dangerous for young minds. I think we can all unite in that theme.

United? Yeah, right. Try to ban porn or merely require 18+ age verification and look at the left’s response. The left knows how destructive porn is and what a rabbit hole it is on young minds. Porn literally digitally grooms kids. You think a sweet young Mormon boy woke up one day and was suddenly into trans furries or whatever the heck? That’s 10 years of brain destroying porn on a young mind.

lol sure. So you want ICE to monitor your internet for usage for porn and non RWNJ activity? What happens next? They bust down your door because you watched a non maga approved video? I tell you what let’s put everything you read, watch and your sex habits on a public forum with your name and work place. If anyone gets offended you can be arrested.

What the f is wrong with you people. This is the right. They think because they got a participation trophy in 6th grade they have the right to enforce their f’ed beliefs on everyone else at gun point. Why do you want to impose religious law on everyone.

Rules for thee none for RWNJs. I will take the “left” any day over what you are pushing.

This has been the goal for decades, starting with prayer in school and banning abortions. It is Christian Fundamentalism at the core and a tyranny of the minoritity, aided by the Supreme Court and the GOP controlled House and Senate.

The sad and effective part of it is that many different part of the religious right eco-system have joined together over decades to make this happen: Opus Dei from the Catholic side (along with the many Catholic Supreme Court Justices they placed) and the Christian Nationalists from the Protestant side. This is the long game. With the overturning of Roe V Wade, the placement of Vance in the Government, and the cooptation of Trump, it's a long game they are winning.

This.

Catholics had best be prepared, fools, when they come for me, they come for thee. Yeah, MAGA catholics and Chabad, Hasids, and Lubavitchers are the same. Same for Muslims who voted for this utter shit.

The ire should be directed to the fundamentalists who have co-opted the government, not the regular folks. 10 years from now, no one will admit to having supported this.

Anyone who voted for Trump or a Republican in Congress is to blame.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These text exchanges just don’t sound the way 22-year-old gamers communicate. Feels off, as if from a fiction writer:

“I had enough of his hatred,” Robinson texted, referring to Charlie Kirk. “Some hate can’t be negotiated out.”

The partner responded with shock, according to a law enforcement reproduction of the text message exchange. “You weren’t the one who did it right????” the partner texted. Robinson responded: “I am, I’m sorry.”

(Copied from NYT)

Welcome to the Truman Show, produced by WWE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

Are you saying the Cato institute is a liberal organization that executes flawed studies too?

https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states

When MAGAs are faced with facts....

🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗

ANd note thisisn't some old study.

It is dated September 11, 2025. Last week.

Inconvenient facts from the Cato Institute:

Thanks for posting this.

Yes, thank you. And the CATO institute is on the right.

The spikes in 1995 and 2016 are from the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Pulse Nightclub Shooting - both right-wing killers.

Good grief. The Pulse nightclub killer was an Islamic extremist. The OK City bombing was anti-govt extremists.

[Anonymous]

So he was sitting there watching the squad car waiting to retrieve the gun and no one in the huge man hunt noticed him?

[Anonymous]

The prosecutor's office of Utah just read out Robinson's texts to his boyfriend (male transitioning to female).

Still think it wasn't him? Takes a lot to backstop a big conspiracy.

They're going for capital murder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Tyler Robinson was really so stupid to post his confession to Discord, why not confess in person since he was so proud? Why hasn’t he provided a verbal confession? There’s nothing to hide.

fishy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should all be terrified that people are being framed for murder for uncovering the truth.

What truth?

The reason why Kirk was murdered, you can figure it out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

Are you saying the Cato institute is a liberal organization that executes flawed studies too?

https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states

When MAGAs are faced with facts....

🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗

ANd note thisisn't some old study.

It is dated September 11, 2025. Last week.

Inconvenient facts from the Cato Institute:

yup

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These text exchanges just don’t sound the way 22-year-old gamers communicate. Feels off, as if from a fiction writer:

“I had enough of his hatred,” Robinson texted, referring to Charlie Kirk. “Some hate can’t be negotiated out.”

The partner responded with shock, according to a law enforcement reproduction of the text message exchange. “You weren’t the one who did it right????” the partner texted. Robinson responded: “I am, I’m sorry.”

(Copied from NYT)

Lol no 22 gamer talks like that. Sounds like some boomer cosplaying

Yeah, these texts didn’t happen. No way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

Are you saying the Cato institute is a liberal organization that executes flawed studies too?

https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states

When MAGAs are faced with facts....

🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗

ANd note thisisn't some old study.

It is dated September 11, 2025. Last week.

Inconvenient facts from the Cato Institute:

Thanks for posting this.

Yes, thank you. And the CATO institute is on the right.

The spikes in 1995 and 2016 are from the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Pulse Nightclub Shooting - both right-wing killers.

Good grief. The Pulse nightclub killer was an Islamic extremist. The OK City bombing was anti-govt extremists.

What did they all have in common with MAGAs?
- conservative
- religious extremists
- want to tear down the US gov't

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

Are you saying the Cato institute is a liberal organization that executes flawed studies too?

https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states

When MAGAs are faced with facts....

🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗

ANd note thisisn't some old study.

It is dated September 11, 2025. Last week.

Inconvenient facts from the Cato Institute:

Thanks for posting this.

Yes, thank you. And the CATO institute is on the right.

The spikes in 1995 and 2016 are from the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Pulse Nightclub Shooting - both right-wing killers.

Good grief. The Pulse nightclub killer was an Islamic extremist. The OK City bombing was anti-govt extremists.

The OKC bombing was a false flag to frame anti-govt extremists. Watch the "Secret life of timothy mcveigh" on YouTube for more details or watch Tucker's interview on it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

Hey, it's worked so many times before. Can you blame them for trying again?

Agree but it’s painful to watch. Wake up people. Read, research, comprehend. They’re lying to us.

I agree something doesn't seem right about this. I don't believe the shooter acted alone. Although there is no evidence thus far, I wonder if Israel could have possibly been involved. We have been lied to so many times by our government which makes it hard to believe anything they say.

I agree. Too many things seem very suspicious, especially Netanyahu’s behavior. But hearing all the issue with Kirk and his Israeli first donors just makes me even more concerned.

+100 Couldn't agree more. Something very off with him and what he was saying.

Total coincidence. Stop asking questions. Believe what you see on TV.

If this were true (and this is a big IF), why would they have him killed for saying no to a request, they could just move and ask someone else.

But if your default stance is:
--Israel and American Jews are by default behind everything bad because given their nature, it is impossible that they are not
--To see everything in the U.S. as an opportunity to advocate for Palestinian nationhood, selfishly--our democracy is at peril and you just have to find a way to make this all about you

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should all be terrified that people are being framed for murder for uncovering the truth.

What truth?

The reason why Kirk was murdered, you can figure it out.

No, I need you to explain this because I’m not fanciful enough. I dont swim in conspiracies.

Sometimes the answer is what is right in front of you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

Hey, it's worked so many times before. Can you blame them for trying again?

Agree but it’s painful to watch. Wake up people. Read, research, comprehend. They’re lying to us.

I agree something doesn't seem right about this. I don't believe the shooter acted alone. Although there is no evidence thus far, I wonder if Israel could have possibly been involved. We have been lied to so many times by our government which makes it hard to believe anything they say.

I agree. Too many things seem very suspicious, especially Netanyahu’s behavior. But hearing all the issue with Kirk and his Israeli first donors just makes me even more concerned.

+100 Couldn't agree more. Something very off with him and what he was saying.

Total coincidence. Stop asking questions. Believe what you see on TV.

I can't imagine anyone saying no to Netanyahu without suffering some type of repercussion, especially a mere influencer like Charlie Kirk and especially saying no to 150 million.