Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

Are you saying the Cato institute is a liberal organization that executes flawed studies too?

https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states

When MAGAs are faced with facts....

🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗

ANd note thisisn't some old study.

It is dated September 11, 2025. Last week.

Inconvenient facts from the Cato Institute:

Thanks for posting this.

Yes, thank you. And the CATO institute is on the right.

The spikes in 1995 and 2016 are from the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Pulse Nightclub Shooting - both right-wing killers.

Good grief. The Pulse nightclub killer was an Islamic extremist. The OK City bombing was anti-govt extremists.

The OKC bombing was a false flag to frame anti-govt extremists. Watch the "Secret life of timothy mcveigh" on YouTube for more details or watch Tucker's interview on it

Good god, get a life!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should all be terrified that people are being framed for murder for uncovering the truth.

What truth?

The reason why Kirk was murdered, you can figure it out.

No, I need you to explain this because I’m not fanciful enough. I dont swim in conspiracies.

Sometimes the answer is what is right in front of you.

If you aren’t saavy or bright enough to come to a plausible logical conclusion that’s your issue. Get a tutor or something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those on the right saying the left are dangerous and violent...

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2025/09/12/is-radical-left-violence-really-on-the-rise-in-america

https://ccjs.umd.edu/feature/umd-led-study-shows-disparities-violence-among-extremist-groups

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/countering-organized-violence-in-the-united-states/

https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/the-rise-of-political-violence-in-the-united-states/

I have yet to find a study that validates that the left is mor violent than the right. To the contrary, the right is 6x-8x more violent than the left.

So stop the lying and gaslighting and certainly put a stop to what the Administration is threatening.

For goodness sake. The president was shot at…twice no less. Throw all the flawed studies you want, but surely some introspection is called for.

Are you saying the Cato institute is a liberal organization that executes flawed studies too?

https://www.cato.org/blog/politically-motivated-violence-rare-united-states

When MAGAs are faced with facts....

🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗

ANd note thisisn't some old study.

It is dated September 11, 2025. Last week.

Inconvenient facts from the Cato Institute:

Thanks for posting this.

Yes, thank you. And the CATO institute is on the right.

The spikes in 1995 and 2016 are from the Oklahoma City Bombing and the Pulse Nightclub Shooting - both right-wing killers.

Good grief. The Pulse nightclub killer was an Islamic extremist. The OK City bombing was anti-govt extremists.

What did they all have in common with MAGAs?
- conservative
- religious extremists
- want to tear down the US gov't

Pro Palestine advocates want to also tear down U.S. govt so it can built back up again into one that hates Israel, hence all their votes for Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Tyler Robinson was really so stupid to post his confession to Discord, why not confess in person since he was so proud? Why hasn’t he provided a verbal confession? There’s nothing to hide.

Charlie Kirk had the right to remain silent and so does his killer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

Hey, it's worked so many times before. Can you blame them for trying again?

Agree but it’s painful to watch. Wake up people. Read, research, comprehend. They’re lying to us.

I agree something doesn't seem right about this. I don't believe the shooter acted alone. Although there is no evidence thus far, I wonder if Israel could have possibly been involved. We have been lied to so many times by our government which makes it hard to believe anything they say.

I agree. Too many things seem very suspicious, especially Netanyahu’s behavior. But hearing all the issue with Kirk and his Israeli first donors just makes me even more concerned.

+100 Couldn't agree more. Something very off with him and what he was saying.

Total coincidence. Stop asking questions. Believe what you see on TV.

I can't imagine anyone saying no to Netanyahu without suffering some type of repercussion, especially a mere influencer like Charlie Kirk and especially saying no to 150 million.

Charlie could read the room. Had he moved more favorably to Bibi/ Israel he would have lost viewers. The whole world is turning against Bibi. That 150-million wasn’t enough to make him lose his clout.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

Hey, it's worked so many times before. Can you blame them for trying again?

Agree but it’s painful to watch. Wake up people. Read, research, comprehend. They’re lying to us.

I agree something doesn't seem right about this. I don't believe the shooter acted alone. Although there is no evidence thus far, I wonder if Israel could have possibly been involved. We have been lied to so many times by our government which makes it hard to believe anything they say.

I agree. Too many things seem very suspicious, especially Netanyahu’s behavior. But hearing all the issue with Kirk and his Israeli first donors just makes me even more concerned.

+100 Couldn't agree more. Something very off with him and what he was saying.

Total coincidence. Stop asking questions. Believe what you see on TV.

Was this offer before or after Charlie Kirk suggested that there was a stand down order on October 7th and insinuated that the Netanyahu government purposefully allowed it to happen?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOUR468EpWq/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should all be terrified that people are being framed for murder for uncovering the truth.

What truth?

The reason why Kirk was murdered, you can figure it out.

No, I need you to explain this because I’m not fanciful enough. I dont swim in conspiracies.

Sometimes the answer is what is right in front of you.

If you aren’t saavy or bright enough to come to a plausible logical conclusion that’s your issue. Get a tutor or something.

Ha ha! You have nothing, just at trying to sow doubt. Put up or shut up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should all be terrified that people are being framed for murder for uncovering the truth.

What truth?

The reason why Kirk was murdered, you can figure it out.

No, I need you to explain this because I’m not fanciful enough. I dont swim in conspiracies.

Sometimes the answer is what is right in front of you.

Yes, it is right in front of us.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Tyler Robinson was really so stupid to post his confession to Discord, why not confess in person since he was so proud? Why hasn’t he provided a verbal confession? There’s nothing to hide.

Charlie Kirk had the right to remain silent and so does his killer.

Charlie was killed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

Hey, it's worked so many times before. Can you blame them for trying again?

Agree but it’s painful to watch. Wake up people. Read, research, comprehend. They’re lying to us.

I agree something doesn't seem right about this. I don't believe the shooter acted alone. Although there is no evidence thus far, I wonder if Israel could have possibly been involved. We have been lied to so many times by our government which makes it hard to believe anything they say.

I agree. Too many things seem very suspicious, especially Netanyahu’s behavior. But hearing all the issue with Kirk and his Israeli first donors just makes me even more concerned.

+100 Couldn't agree more. Something very off with him and what he was saying.

Total coincidence. Stop asking questions. Believe what you see on TV.

I can't imagine anyone saying no to Netanyahu without suffering some type of repercussion, especially a mere influencer like Charlie Kirk and especially saying no to 150 million.

Charlie could read the room. Had he moved more favorably to Bibi/ Israel he would have lost viewers. The whole world is turning against Bibi. That 150-million wasn’t enough to make him lose his clout.

Bibi is politically one of the most powerful men in the world and in charge of one of the most sophisticated and dangerous intelligence agencies. If he really did say no, hmm...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

Hey, it's worked so many times before. Can you blame them for trying again?

Agree but it’s painful to watch. Wake up people. Read, research, comprehend. They’re lying to us.

I agree something doesn't seem right about this. I don't believe the shooter acted alone. Although there is no evidence thus far, I wonder if Israel could have possibly been involved. We have been lied to so many times by our government which makes it hard to believe anything they say.

I agree. Too many things seem very suspicious, especially Netanyahu’s behavior. But hearing all the issue with Kirk and his Israeli first donors just makes me even more concerned.

+100 Couldn't agree more. Something very off with him and what he was saying.

Total coincidence. Stop asking questions. Believe what you see on TV.

I can't imagine anyone saying no to Netanyahu without suffering some type of repercussion, especially a mere influencer like Charlie Kirk and especially saying no to 150 million.

Charlie could read the room. Had he moved more favorably to Bibi/ Israel he would have lost viewers. The whole world is turning against Bibi. That 150-million wasn’t enough to make him lose his clout.

American free speech and democracy is in crisis and you are telling us to turn or heads and focus on YOUR enemy, Israel. We don't have to talk about Palestine's desires all of the time.

[Anonymous]

The main point isn't whether the shooter was left or right, its that "the state" (JD Vance, Stephen Miller, Keh Patel, etc) is making an argument that he was indoctrinated by some nebulous leftist ideology or organization and there is no evidence of that

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They must think we’re all a bunch of brainwashed idiot groupthinkers to buy into this narrative they’re pushing. It’s quite insulting.

Hey, it's worked so many times before. Can you blame them for trying again?

Agree but it’s painful to watch. Wake up people. Read, research, comprehend. They’re lying to us.

I agree something doesn't seem right about this. I don't believe the shooter acted alone. Although there is no evidence thus far, I wonder if Israel could have possibly been involved. We have been lied to so many times by our government which makes it hard to believe anything they say.

I agree. Too many things seem very suspicious, especially Netanyahu’s behavior. But hearing all the issue with Kirk and his Israeli first donors just makes me even more concerned.

+100 Couldn't agree more. Something very off with him and what he was saying.

Total coincidence. Stop asking questions. Believe what you see on TV.

I can't imagine anyone saying no to Netanyahu without suffering some type of repercussion, especially a mere influencer like Charlie Kirk and especially saying no to 150 million.

Charlie could read the room. Had he moved more favorably to Bibi/ Israel he would have lost viewers. The whole world is turning against Bibi. That 150-million wasn’t enough to make him lose his clout.

Bibi is politically one of the most powerful men in the world and in charge of one of the most sophisticated and dangerous intelligence agencies. If he really did say no, hmm...

"Ohh let's use this incident to convince Americans to go to war against Israel, if America falls in the meanwhile, oh well, we will get what we want in the end!"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should all be terrified that people are being framed for murder for uncovering the truth.

What truth?

The reason why Kirk was murdered, you can figure it out.

No, I need you to explain this because I’m not fanciful enough. I dont swim in conspiracies.

Sometimes the answer is what is right in front of you.

Yes, it is right in front of us.

Wow, Ben Shapiro is so lucky. Ben got Breitbart after Andrew abruptly died and now gets Kirk’s show too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We should all be terrified that people are being framed for murder for uncovering the truth.

What truth?

The reason why Kirk was murdered, you can figure it out.

No, I need you to explain this because I’m not fanciful enough. I dont swim in conspiracies.

Sometimes the answer is what is right in front of you.

Yes, it is right in front of us.

Wow, Ben Shapiro is so lucky. Ben got Breitbart after Andrew abruptly died and now gets Kirk’s show too.

We see what you did there…