She picked Tim

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“Neighborliness” - oh, dear. Nope.

+1

[Anonymous]

Oh great, Walz signed a bill allowing Minnesota to take custody of your child if you refuse to the the child have “gender affirming care”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think this was a mistake.
Better than Shapiro.
I think she should have gone moderate/ conservative.
Appeal to both aspects of the party, independents and conservative never Trumpers.
3 months from now we'll know.

Nah, that's loser talk. She's already fairly moderate. If she wants to energize her base and increase turnout, this was the smart pick.

I am outside of the DC , though not a swing state the population is very similar to those in swing states.
No she's not moderate by measures outside of the Democratic party or rather a faction of the Democratic party.

If you were alive in the 70s, you know that most current Democratic politicians are more conservative than their predecessors. A lot of them are more conservative than 20th century Republicans.

People urging Democrats to appeal to "moderates" or say that they themselves are "moderates" are really pretty conservative.

+1

Nixon would be labeled a liberal today.

On the other hand, I’ve often read that President Kennedy would be a conservative today and that the Democratic Party is way more liberal today than in the 60s. Everything is relative in terms of the issues people are facing in their own times.

The D party is far more left today than it was in the mid century. Even just recently, remember the blue dog coalition? The modern D party is very close to the dem socialist parties of Europe, which are thoroughly on the left.

The southern strategy and corresponding shift in parties was a thing that happened after kennedy was killed and Newt took power in the House in the late 1980's/early 1990's.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Yep, heard Shapiro declined as know is a losing ticket. He will gear up for 2028.

“He didn’t want those grapes, anyway, they were probably sour.”

Stop whining and start stumping for the ticket, Josh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Biggest question: Does Tim Walz move the needle for independents/moderates?

yes, he does. In a good way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

this

Yes.

This was a great pick. A lot of the takes just show how out of touch the Republicans are with the modern electorate.

[Anonymous]

The MAGAs seem upset. That people are tired of their weird attacks.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's put the ageism to rest. Walz is 18 years younger than Trump. Trump is old enough to be his father.

waltz, trump and kamala are all boomers. waltz looks older than trump

[img]https://images.axios.com/yA4coU_0svEFWZ43XIXBUr0-7wg=/0x180:5500x3274/1920x1080/2024/07/30/1722372886428.jpg?w=1920
[/img]

He doesn't look older to me, but I guess I don't really care about that. He appears normal. Beautifully normal.

He reminds me of Steve Martin.

Bring Steve Martin back to SNL!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Nice try.

For real. MAGA desperation is palpable.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think this was a mistake.
Better than Shapiro.
I think she should have gone moderate/ conservative.
Appeal to both aspects of the party, independents and conservative never Trumpers.
3 months from now we'll know.

Nah, that's loser talk. She's already fairly moderate. If she wants to energize her base and increase turnout, this was the smart pick.

I am outside of the DC , though not a swing state the population is very similar to those in swing states.
No she's not moderate by measures outside of the Democratic party or rather a faction of the Democratic party.

If you were alive in the 70s, you know that most current Democratic politicians are more conservative than their predecessors. A lot of them are more conservative than 20th century Republicans.

People urging Democrats to appeal to "moderates" or say that they themselves are "moderates" are really pretty conservative.

+1

Nixon would be labeled a liberal today.

On the other hand, I’ve often read that President Kennedy would be a conservative today and that the Democratic Party is way more liberal today than in the 60s. Everything is relative in terms of the issues people are facing in their own times.

Actually, Nixon and Reagan are progressives by today's standards.

Nixon was no conservative, that isn't a revelation. That was understood even during his term.

Reagan however is no progressive by the standards of any time.

True, though on both Russia and Immigration, he would be considered a democrat today.

[Anonymous]

SHOW US YOUR TAX RETURNS
SHOW US IF YOURE PRO ISREAL
SHOW US YOUR COLLEGE TRANSPRICTS

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Let's put the ageism to rest. Walz is 18 years younger than Trump. Trump is old enough to be his father.

waltz, trump and kamala are all boomers. waltz looks older than trump

No. Trump could be his dad.

[Anonymous]

50 pages of comments and MAGA hasn't found one single aspect of policy or character to criticize Walz for. They are running scared.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Boring and normal. Coaches football. Goes hunting. Veteran. Let's his dog sit on the couch... unlike Vance. Vance is very territorial and doesn't let anyone else sit on his couch.

TRUMP COACH SOCCER FROM 1960-1970 FOR A TEAM IN NEW YORK CITY
TRUMP STARTED COAHING HUNTING IN 1960
TRUMP LOVE PETS