Kevin Costner divorce

[Anonymous]

Kevin will be fine. Christine has 5 years left to collect child support, she really needs to move this divorce along so she can snag another hubby. The way this is playing out, her next prenup will be even more ironclad.

[Anonymous]

I care and I used to like him. He is just a bitter creepy guy. She was naive and looks like she couldn’t take it anymore. Hope she has a good attorney. He is vindictive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He will not recover for this in the media. Most people feel that if you are married almost 20 years that you are a partner and partners should not be treated like some kind help. I agree she was clueless what she signed. A gold digger would not be married almost 20 years and a gold digger could continue
with the marriage because he is not there. Some of the facts are so bizarre. There was no house bought together in 29 years!! No car owned until she must have put her foot down to actually own something. He just comes across as old and cheap and mean. Yuck!! Good for her to have the courage to walk out. I hope she finds someone who will love her and not treat her like she should be happy to get a meal. Sad for their kids.

I will continue to watch Costner shows and movies if they are good. I’m already sad about Yellowstone. So no, I don’t think most people care about this rich man and his trophy wife. If he gives good cinema, we will watch.

Yes Costner is cheap ASF. That’s his wife’s problem and I don’t care. She knew what she was marrying into.

Yea the wife is dumb ASF. Or maybe not. If she purchased jewels and expensive bags that appreciate in value, she will be fine.

If wife signed that prenup with her attorney’s advice, she cannot claim she did not understand. It took her twenty years plus to figure out she did not understand. Judge ain’t gonna buy that argument. Wife should have asked for an adjustment in the prenup during the course of the marriage.

The children will be fine. They will be better off than eighty -percent of children who have to deal with divorced parents.

She should sue whoever represented her when the prenup was signed. The terms are unconscionable, IMO. I get that others including the judge disagrees, but I can't believe she paid someone to represent her and ended up with that thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He will not recover for this in the media. Most people feel that if you are married almost 20 years that you are a partner and partners should not be treated like some kind help. I agree she was clueless what she signed. A gold digger would not be married almost 20 years and a gold digger could continue
with the marriage because he is not there. Some of the facts are so bizarre. There was no house bought together in 29 years!! No car owned until she must have put her foot down to actually own something. He just comes across as old and cheap and mean. Yuck!! Good for her to have the courage to walk out. I hope she finds someone who will love her and not treat her like she should be happy to get a meal. Sad for their kids.

I will continue to watch Costner shows and movies if they are good. I’m already sad about Yellowstone. So no, I don’t think most people care about this rich man and his trophy wife. If he gives good cinema, we will watch.

Yes Costner is cheap ASF. That’s his wife’s problem and I don’t care. She knew what she was marrying into.

Yea the wife is dumb ASF. Or maybe not. If she purchased jewels and expensive bags that appreciate in value, she will be fine.

If wife signed that prenup with her attorney’s advice, she cannot claim she did not understand. It took her twenty years plus to figure out she did not understand. Judge ain’t gonna buy that argument. Wife should have asked for an adjustment in the prenup during the course of the marriage.

The children will be fine. They will be better off than eighty -percent of children who have to deal with divorced parents.

She should sue whoever represented her when the prenup was signed. The terms are unconscionable, IMO. I get that others including the judge disagrees, but I can't believe she paid someone to represent her and ended up with that thing.

If she pushed back, he could have told her to get lost. She was a dime a dozen, he was a handsome 48 year old filthy rich A list actor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He will not recover for this in the media. Most people feel that if you are married almost 20 years that you are a partner and partners should not be treated like some kind help. I agree she was clueless what she signed. A gold digger would not be married almost 20 years and a gold digger could continue
with the marriage because he is not there. Some of the facts are so bizarre. There was no house bought together in 29 years!! No car owned until she must have put her foot down to actually own something. He just comes across as old and cheap and mean. Yuck!! Good for her to have the courage to walk out. I hope she finds someone who will love her and not treat her like she should be happy to get a meal. Sad for their kids.

I will continue to watch Costner shows and movies if they are good. I’m already sad about Yellowstone. So no, I don’t think most people care about this rich man and his trophy wife. If he gives good cinema, we will watch.

Yes Costner is cheap ASF. That’s his wife’s problem and I don’t care. She knew what she was marrying into.

Yea the wife is dumb ASF. Or maybe not. If she purchased jewels and expensive bags that appreciate in value, she will be fine.

If wife signed that prenup with her attorney’s advice, she cannot claim she did not understand. It took her twenty years plus to figure out she did not understand. Judge ain’t gonna buy that argument. Wife should have asked for an adjustment in the prenup during the course of the marriage.

The children will be fine. They will be better off than eighty -percent of children who have to deal with divorced parents.

She should sue whoever represented her when the prenup was signed. The terms are unconscionable, IMO. I get that others including the judge disagrees, but I can't believe she paid someone to represent her and ended up with that thing.

If she pushed back, he could have told her to get lost. She was a dime a dozen, he was a handsome 48 year old filthy rich A list actor.

Fine. She might have freed herself to find and marry someone who valued her as an actual partner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He will not recover for this in the media. Most people feel that if you are married almost 20 years that you are a partner and partners should not be treated like some kind help. I agree she was clueless what she signed. A gold digger would not be married almost 20 years and a gold digger could continue
with the marriage because he is not there. Some of the facts are so bizarre. There was no house bought together in 29 years!! No car owned until she must have put her foot down to actually own something. He just comes across as old and cheap and mean. Yuck!! Good for her to have the courage to walk out. I hope she finds someone who will love her and not treat her like she should be happy to get a meal. Sad for their kids.

I will continue to watch Costner shows and movies if they are good. I’m already sad about Yellowstone. So no, I don’t think most people care about this rich man and his trophy wife. If he gives good cinema, we will watch.

Yes Costner is cheap ASF. That’s his wife’s problem and I don’t care. She knew what she was marrying into.

Yea the wife is dumb ASF. Or maybe not. If she purchased jewels and expensive bags that appreciate in value, she will be fine.

If wife signed that prenup with her attorney’s advice, she cannot claim she did not understand. It took her twenty years plus to figure out she did not understand. Judge ain’t gonna buy that argument. Wife should have asked for an adjustment in the prenup during the course of the marriage.

The children will be fine. They will be better off than eighty -percent of children who have to deal with divorced parents.

She should sue whoever represented her when the prenup was signed. The terms are unconscionable, IMO. I get that others including the judge disagrees, but I can't believe she paid someone to represent her and ended up with that thing.

If she pushed back, he could have told her to get lost. She was a dime a dozen, he was a handsome 48 year old filthy rich A list actor.

Fine. She might have freed herself to find and marry someone who valued her as an actual partner.

But then she wouldn’t have been able to spend millions on her plastic surgery and lavish vacations!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He will not recover for this in the media. Most people feel that if you are married almost 20 years that you are a partner and partners should not be treated like some kind help. I agree she was clueless what she signed. A gold digger would not be married almost 20 years and a gold digger could continue
with the marriage because he is not there. Some of the facts are so bizarre. There was no house bought together in 29 years!! No car owned until she must have put her foot down to actually own something. He just comes across as old and cheap and mean. Yuck!! Good for her to have the courage to walk out. I hope she finds someone who will love her and not treat her like she should be happy to get a meal. Sad for their kids.

I will continue to watch Costner shows and movies if they are good. I’m already sad about Yellowstone. So no, I don’t think most people care about this rich man and his trophy wife. If he gives good cinema, we will watch.

Yes Costner is cheap ASF. That’s his wife’s problem and I don’t care. She knew what she was marrying into.

Yea the wife is dumb ASF. Or maybe not. If she purchased jewels and expensive bags that appreciate in value, she will be fine.

If wife signed that prenup with her attorney’s advice, she cannot claim she did not understand. It took her twenty years plus to figure out she did not understand. Judge ain’t gonna buy that argument. Wife should have asked for an adjustment in the prenup during the course of the marriage.

The children will be fine. They will be better off than eighty -percent of children who have to deal with divorced parents.

She should sue whoever represented her when the prenup was signed. The terms are unconscionable, IMO. I get that others including the judge disagrees, but I can't believe she paid someone to represent her and ended up with that thing.

If she pushed back, he could have told her to get lost. She was a dime a dozen, he was a handsome 48 year old filthy rich A list actor.

+1 yep

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I can't figure out if she is dumb, or playing dumb. First, who in the world marries a celebrity / multimillionaire and doesn't take advantage of the opportunity to build their own income? I mean, Lionel Messi's wife, all the real housewives have some kind of product they are hawking. It sounds like he was encouraging her to do this. It wouldn't need to be a FT job. You can still be a FT SAHM. And secondly, all this time she was not funding your own 401K/ IRA or setting up any sort of financial safety net? Either she has been sneakily funneling money for years (but you'd think that would be uncovered during discovery), or she is an utter idiot. My instinct is the latter, since her approach to the divorce seems so sloppy. Then again, she was smart enough to marry Kevin Costner. Maybe she got lazy after that.

Just because you are pretty enough to marry someone famous doesn’t make you some sort of entrepreneur. Also totally different person than Lionel Messi’s wife. His wife is his childhood sweetheart that met him while living her life and developing her own interests.

Also even Christine was contributing the max each year in a 401k/IRA that’s not going to allow her the lifestyle she is looking for.

+1 Too many people on this forum think money is the end all, be all in life. It absolutely is not.

Tell that to Christine.

I would if I knew her.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He will not recover for this in the media. Most people feel that if you are married almost 20 years that you are a partner and partners should not be treated like some kind help. I agree she was clueless what she signed. A gold digger would not be married almost 20 years and a gold digger could continue
with the marriage because he is not there. Some of the facts are so bizarre. There was no house bought together in 29 years!! No car owned until she must have put her foot down to actually own something. He just comes across as old and cheap and mean. Yuck!! Good for her to have the courage to walk out. I hope she finds someone who will love her and not treat her like she should be happy to get a meal. Sad for their kids.

I will continue to watch Costner shows and movies if they are good. I’m already sad about Yellowstone. So no, I don’t think most people care about this rich man and his trophy wife. If he gives good cinema, we will watch.

Yes Costner is cheap ASF. That’s his wife’s problem and I don’t care. She knew what she was marrying into.

Yea the wife is dumb ASF. Or maybe not. If she purchased jewels and expensive bags that appreciate in value, she will be fine.

If wife signed that prenup with her attorney’s advice, she cannot claim she did not understand. It took her twenty years plus to figure out she did not understand. Judge ain’t gonna buy that argument. Wife should have asked for an adjustment in the prenup during the course of the marriage.

The children will be fine. They will be better off than eighty -percent of children who have to deal with divorced parents.

She should sue whoever represented her when the prenup was signed. The terms are unconscionable, IMO. I get that others including the judge disagrees, but I can't believe she paid someone to represent her and ended up with that thing.

If she pushed back, he could have told her to get lost. She was a dime a dozen, he was a handsome 48 year old filthy rich A list actor.

Fine. She might have freed herself to find and marry someone who valued her as an actual partner.

She was pretty but fact is she was nearly 30 when they married. That's not a spring chicken. If she could have done better, she'd have done better.

[Anonymous]

So now she’s back asking for $200,000 a month in child support so the children can continue taking private planes to luxury vacations?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So now she’s back asking for $200,000 a month in child support so the children can continue taking private planes to luxury vacations?

Do judges really consider vacations?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now she’s back asking for $200,000 a month in child support so the children can continue taking private planes to luxury vacations?

Do judges really consider vacations?

Not sure, but surprised she accepted the first ruling only to turn around and immediately ask for more…again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So now she’s back asking for $200,000 a month in child support so the children can continue taking private planes to luxury vacations?

Do judges really consider vacations?

Not sure, but surprised she accepted the first ruling only to turn around and immediately ask for more…again.

Did she really accept the ruling? I thought they both provided financials - and requests for amounts - and then the judge set the amount based on income/expenses? I think she’s appealing the original amount.

[Anonymous]

DM article saying how she sobbed in court about the good old days when they shipped in tons of snow and all the animals for a living nativity.

Guess what, lady? Sometimes you need to adjust your standard of living. It happens to plenty of people—including children whose parents divorce.

Zero sympathy for any of this divas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DM article saying how she sobbed in court about the good old days when they shipped in tons of snow and all the animals for a living nativity.

Guess what, lady? Sometimes you need to adjust your standard of living. It happens to plenty of people—including children whose parents divorce.

Zero sympathy for any of this divas.

WTF?
Time for her to quit whining and get a job.