How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BUMP!!

It’s very funny and telling that on the day of a scotus confirmation hearing, this thread has fallen out of the top items page.

Haha, sorry crazed ACB haters! This wonderful woman left you with nothing to say.

Ummm. I think people are letting Amy Covid Barrett insert foot in mouth over and over again. Many Cult 45 is making you sweaty and fevered at the brow? I hear they have drive-in testing for that...but alas, no vaccine...and soon you will have no health insurance...

DP. Actually, she didn’t misspeak or gaffe one time. Not once. She is very deliberate about every word and means what she says. It must be so disappointing for you! She is a dignified, serious scholar and judge who knows the law inside and out. She’ll make an excellent justice.

Yes, she is very good at not answering basic questions like "is racism bad" and "should there be a peaceful transition of power in the US"

What are you talking about? I guess you are just getting sound bites from ideologues because she actually answered both these questions.

+1
She was asked yesterday if white supremacy was wrong and she answered YES, it is wrong. I swear, DCUM’s finest are making up blatant lies and expecting people to just believe them.

To the pp's quote above:

" Q: Do you believe that every president should make a commitment unequivocally and resolutely to the peaceful transfer of power?

Amy Coney Barrett: (02:21:42)
Well, Senator, that seems to me to be pulling me in a little bit into this question of whether the president has said that he would not peacefully leave office. And so to the extent that this is a political controversy right now, as a judge, I want to stay out of it and I don’t want to express a view on."

Pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Well, so much for qualified

[Anonymous]

I am a liberal, never-Trump lawyer who thinks the Democratic senators have done a terrible job in this hearing. It’s utterly ridiculous to keep pointing out that ACB is nothing like RBG. There are plenty of things to press her on: what the 2nd Amendment meant at the time it was written (spoiler alert: not semi-automatic assault rifles), how to reconcile her previous statement that Garland shouldn’t be confirmed during an election year, and others. But to whine about policy and to complain to her that she holds a judicial philosophy different from RBG just adds fuel to the GOP’s fire.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ACB owned the democrats! She is many levels beyond them as an intellectual and in competence. Harris looked like a fool. ACB will be confirmed easily.

+1
Agree. She dismissed Harris handily.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ACB owned the democrats! She is many levels beyond them as an intellectual and in competence. Harris looked like a fool. ACB will be confirmed easily.

+1
Agree. She dismissed Harris handily.

But she doesn't know the First Amendment. Mmmhmmm.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They are coming for your contraception and IVF.

BS. You people are such fear mongers. Hawley made it very clear, and ACB conformed, that Griswold is in NO danger of being overturned. It is a super precedent.

No. It is not. It is the foundational basis for ALL subsequent right to privacy basis. A pillar of substantive due process. Both of which are anathema to Originalists.

[Anonymous]

Good for Lindsey Graham. Great statement.

[Anonymous]

Here comes Dogma Dianne.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good for Lindsey Graham. Great statement.

Did he ask her about the First Amendment too?

[Anonymous]

ACB is eating democrat lunch at the hearing. You ladies should be embarrassed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:ACB is eating democrat lunch at the hearing. You ladies should be embarrassed.

Why? We know the liberties protected by the First Amendment. Unlike ACB.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ACB owned the democrats! She is many levels beyond them as an intellectual and in competence. Harris looked like a fool. ACB will be confirmed easily.

This confirmation has nothing to do with intellect, but keep telling yourself that.

Well, certainly not “Democratic” intellect. None has been on display.
DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ACB owned the democrats! She is many levels beyond them as an intellectual and in competence. Harris looked like a fool. ACB will be confirmed easily.

This confirmation has nothing to do with intellect, but keep telling yourself that.

Well, certainly not “Democratic” intellect. None has been on display.
DP

I bet the Democrats know which freedoms the First Amendment protects tho.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of Blackburn, she had the most insightful words of the day. And I’m pro-choice, btw. Edited for clarity.

“Some of our (Democratic) colleagues chose to mention this yesterday... Republicans don’t nominate enough female judges. But when we nominate a highly qualified woman for a Supreme Court vacancy, what is the very first thing they do? They turn their attack machine on. And then they start into the politics of personal destruction. And they attack you for not fitting into the paradigm of the left - because you’re pro-life, pro-family, pro-religion... and if you don’t buy into this agenda of the left, if you’re female, then they act as if you’re not a “real” woman. And I will tell you, quite frankly, that they do NOT believe that all women deserve to have the opportunity to have a seat at the table. It’s only “certain” women, and we have seen their liberal narrative play out today. Senator Hirono really tuned up on this when she suggested that you, of all people, would not support women in the workplace. And I will tell you this: as a woman who has worked in the private sector and then in public service - when comments like that are made, it discourages ALL women from trying to step forward and take the skills they have developed in one area of their life, and then use it as an opportunity to serve their nation, serve their community, because they don’t want the liberal attack machine pointed at them. ... It is so discouraging to me to see groups on the left say, “We want diversity.” But let that diversity come from a woman who is on the political right, and their heads explode.

I find it so interesting that they have tried to use this focus (Barrett’s personal faith) to evaluate your professionalism as a judge. They are doing to you *exactly* what they say they despise.”

This is a great statement.. So true. And, glad that Blackburn pointed it out.

Where did any of the democratic senators questions her about her personal faith?
The only people talking about her faith were republicans.

Really! So all the Democrats who kept bringing up the petition she signed at her church re: abortion weren’t asking about her personal faith? Interesting!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Well, so much for qualified

Oooooops.