How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

So Ben Sasse couldn’t be bothered shaving today? Did he not know he would be questioning the SCOTUS nominee?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Ben Sasse couldn’t be bothered shaving today? Did he not know he would be questioning the SCOTUS nominee?

Didn't bother yesterday either. Nebraska thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So Ben Sasse couldn’t be bothered shaving today? Did he not know he would be questioning the SCOTUS nominee?

Didn't bother yesterday either. Nebraska thing.

COVID flavor-saver

[Anonymous]

They are coming for your contraception and IVF.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:So Ben Sasse couldn’t be bothered shaving today? Did he not know he would be questioning the SCOTUS nominee?

Maybe he’s got covid and is feeling poorly.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

From yesterday, sorry. Forgot to note that.

[Anonymous]

Wow, Josh Hawley going full Russian disinformation on the senate hearing. They are outing themselves.

[Anonymous]

Ooh, snap Sen. Hawley!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

They are coming for your contraception and IVF.

BS. You people are such fear mongers. Hawley made it very clear, and ACB conformed, that Griswold is in NO danger of being overturned. It is a super precedent.

[Anonymous]

*confirmed

[Anonymous]

I will just never trust she wasn't picked to overturn Roe, the ACA, etc. I want to believe her statements of independence and I want to like her (for what it even matters). Like, a super conservative woman with seven kids who has made choices I would never make and has beliefs I don't should be able to be a serious jurist.

But I just always come back to who nominated her, from a Federalist Society list, being rammed through during an election year by a spineless, cowardly GOP. Maybe she will prove me wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are doing a terrible job. All they are doing for the most part are asking her questions about policy decisions, rather than questions about the law. Harris and a bunch of other lightweights were basically telling Barrett to ignore the constitution so that some people don’t lose their health insurance. For goodness sake, if the ACA is unconstitutional bc the Ds did such a terrible job writing it and rushing to pass it, appellate judges and SCOTUS are just supposed to ignore that? How about Congress does their job and does it well in the first instance.

+100
And they continue to demand she give her opinion on various issues, knowing FULL WELL that as a sitting judge, she may not opine. They’re forcing her to keep demurring so that it looks like she’s stonewalling. The fact is, she is not legally allowed to give her opinion on issues or hypothetical cases that might come before her. Democrats are such clowns.

[Anonymous]

How is Hawley managing to sound so condescending/mansplaining when he is a supporter of ACB? He is in love with himself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

They are coming for your contraception and IVF.

BS. You people are such fear mongers. Hawley made it very clear, and ACB conformed, that Griswold is in NO danger of being overturned. It is a super precedent.

According to Barrett, Griswold is NOT under the category of super-precedent, like Brown v. Board.