BRYC Girls TD Larry Best leaving for Washington Spirit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Clyde Watson used to coach Freedom at the SoccerPlex.

His salary is posted online at his current club. Could Spirit Org. make him an offer he couldn't refuse and attract local talent to the Academy?

Pie in the sky, as he is Mr. ECNL, at least right now.

CW is the Pied Piper of McLean that will lead the lassies to WS?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Clyde Watson used to coach Freedom at the SoccerPlex.

His salary is posted online at his current club. Could Spirit Org. make him an offer he couldn't refuse and attract local talent to the Academy?

Pie in the sky, as he is Mr. ECNL, at least right now.

CW is the Pied Piper of McLean that will lead the lassies to WS?

Nah. It ain’t CW. Someone else is still playing that magic flute though. Amirite?

[Anonymous]

everyone claims to develop when in fact there just trying to recruit each others players or find ready made players coming in from other teams.

[Anonymous]

The McLean ECNL 05 team is doing well in ECNL but that conference is not as strong as the NE Conference. The team did pick up a few players from the DC Stoddert team which was a pretty solid team, finishing as a semi-finalist in MD State Cup.

Why would CW go anywhere? McLean's ECNL program is the best in the region. One of their coaches was just named club coach of the year.

I read a negative comment about FCV's 05 players being robots. Didn't the team win state cup and isn't the A team leading the DA MA Conference? I thought FCV had several of its DA teams that will qualify for the DA playoffs. Didn't Emily Fox play for FCV?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The spirit VA will not get better unless there are some MAJOR changes

Such as?

More selective rosters. If they had 22 ballers, that would be one thing, but they don't. So with what they have, they should pick their best 16 or so and develop the hell out of them. This means cutting some players. OR putting them on GFR rosters the opportunity to sometimes train or guest play with the DA.

[Anonymous]

More selective rosters will probably happen next year as Spirit adds more coaches and beefs up the DA as they stated they were going to do. Let’s see how the ID sessions go and who turns up before everyone just writes them off. U13 (2006) is really the only group that needs a talent influx-05 and up are doing pretty well and will be contributing to improve.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The McLean ECNL 05 team is doing well in ECNL but that conference is not as strong as the NE Conference. The team did pick up a few players from the DC Stoddert team which was a pretty solid team, finishing as a semi-finalist in MD State Cup.

Why would CW go anywhere? McLean's ECNL program is the best in the region. One of their coaches was just named club coach of the year.

I read a negative comment about FCV's 05 players being robots. Didn't the team win state cup and isn't the A team leading the DA MA Conference? I thought FCV had several of its DA teams that will qualify for the DA playoffs. Didn't Emily Fox play for FCV?

The fact that McLean ECNL 05 was successful this year despite losing a ton of players to Spirit and Arlington is a testament to Clyde Watson's ability to recruit players.

In order for a club to be successful in this area they have to be aggressive about recruiting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More selective rosters will probably happen next year as Spirit adds more coaches and beefs up the DA as they stated they were going to do. Let’s see how the ID sessions go and who turns up before everyone just writes them off. U13 (2006) is really the only group that needs a talent influx-05 and up are doing pretty well and will be contributing to improve.

What makes you certain rosters will be more selective? The same thing was promised last year, but it didn't happen. I also wouldnt say 05 and up are doing "pretty well" . The 04 team is a perfect example of an excessively large roster with a segment of players that shouldn't be playing at that level.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More selective rosters will probably happen next year as Spirit adds more coaches and beefs up the DA as they stated they were going to do. Let’s see how the ID sessions go and who turns up before everyone just writes them off. U13 (2006) is really the only group that needs a talent influx-05 and up are doing pretty well and will be contributing to improve.

U13 is a pilot group and had several play-ups, so not sure the results are representative of what things will look like next year. The group that needs the most help is obvious--the current U16/17. The rest are OK if the focus is on development and not results.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More selective rosters will probably happen next year as Spirit adds more coaches and beefs up the DA as they stated they were going to do. Let’s see how the ID sessions go and who turns up before everyone just writes them off. U13 (2006) is really the only group that needs a talent influx-05 and up are doing pretty well and will be contributing to improve.

U13 is a pilot group and had several play-ups, so not sure the results are representative of what things will look like next year. The group that needs the most help is obvious--the current U16/17. The rest are OK if the focus is on development and not results.

Slightly disagree with last sentence, only in that, if there are more selective rosters across the age groups, then girls currently playing up should be dropped back to their age groups. Agree that focus should be on development, not results. Great if get both, but former is more important than latter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More selective rosters will probably happen next year as Spirit adds more coaches and beefs up the DA as they stated they were going to do. Let’s see how the ID sessions go and who turns up before everyone just writes them off. U13 (2006) is really the only group that needs a talent influx-05 and up are doing pretty well and will be contributing to improve.

U13 is a pilot group and had several play-ups, so not sure the results are representative of what things will look like next year. The group that needs the most help is obvious--the current U16/17. The rest are OK if the focus is on development and not results.

Slightly disagree with last sentence, only in that, if there are more selective rosters across the age groups, then girls currently playing up should be dropped back to their age groups. Agree that focus should be on development, not results. Great if get both, but former is more important than latter.

Agree with that. Most if not all should play with their age group in the standard groups. The pilot is an experimental group and play-ups are OK there, especially if they want to integrate exceptional talent to keep as they move up to the standard age groups. A good tactic for that, actually.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More selective rosters will probably happen next year as Spirit adds more coaches and beefs up the DA as they stated they were going to do. Let’s see how the ID sessions go and who turns up before everyone just writes them off. U13 (2006) is really the only group that needs a talent influx-05 and up are doing pretty well and will be contributing to improve.

U13 is a pilot group and had several play-ups, so not sure the results are representative of what things will look like next year. The group that needs the most help is obvious--the current U16/17. The rest are OK if the focus is on development and not results.

Actually the U16/17 team is another example. There are four 02s playing up on the U19s and even the goalie is an 03. Also that team has an 04 on it consistently, keeps having to field 04 goalies and sometimes an 04 playing up who is completely out of her depth. It also probably a couple of players who should never have been picked up. Of all the teams, that one's roster has been the most mishandled.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More selective rosters will probably happen next year as Spirit adds more coaches and beefs up the DA as they stated they were going to do. Let’s see how the ID sessions go and who turns up before everyone just writes them off. U13 (2006) is really the only group that needs a talent influx-05 and up are doing pretty well and will be contributing to improve.

U13 is a pilot group and had several play-ups, so not sure the results are representative of what things will look like next year. The group that needs the most help is obvious--the current U16/17. The rest are OK if the focus is on development and not results.

Actually the U16/17 team is another example. There are four 02s playing up on the U19s and even the goalie is an 03. Also that team has an 04 on it consistently, keeps having to field 04 goalies and sometimes an 04 playing up who is completely out of her depth. It also probably a couple of players who should never have been picked up. Of all the teams, that one's roster has been the most mishandled.

To be fair, at least on the goalie side of things, having watched all the age groups play, I would argue that the 04 goalies (either of them) playing up to 02/03 are not a drop in talent/performance from the of-age keepers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:More selective rosters will probably happen next year as Spirit adds more coaches and beefs up the DA as they stated they were going to do. Let’s see how the ID sessions go and who turns up before everyone just writes them off. U13 (2006) is really the only group that needs a talent influx-05 and up are doing pretty well and will be contributing to improve.

U13 is a pilot group and had several play-ups, so not sure the results are representative of what things will look like next year. The group that needs the most help is obvious--the current U16/17. The rest are OK if the focus is on development and not results.

Actually the U16/17 team is another example. There are four 02s playing up on the U19s and even the goalie is an 03. Also that team has an 04 on it consistently, keeps having to field 04 goalies and sometimes an 04 playing up who is completely out of her depth. It also probably a couple of players who should never have been picked up. Of all the teams, that one's roster has been the most mishandled.

To be fair, at least on the goalie side of things, having watched all the age groups play, I would argue that the 04 goalies (either of them) playing up to 02/03 are not a drop in talent/performance from the of-age keepers.

I disagree entirely, having been a goal keeper mysel in college. Both the 02 and 03 keepers are better overall - with the 03 keeper being exceptional. Better shotstopping, better direction from the back, and the 03 keeper has the best distribution. But in keeping with other posts, no one is under challenged when playing in their own age group.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More selective rosters will probably happen next year as Spirit adds more coaches and beefs up the DA as they stated they were going to do. Let’s see how the ID sessions go and who turns up before everyone just writes them off. U13 (2006) is really the only group that needs a talent influx-05 and up are doing pretty well and will be contributing to improve.

Just wow. The 05, 04 and 03 teams ALL needs major talent influx. To say otherwise is completely delusional.