Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The guidelines confirm that Erik Prince lied to congress about the Seychelles meetings with Putin ally Dmitriev, the August 2016 meeting with Nader, Trump Jr, Zamel and, WikiLeaks.

How is he not in jail?

1. He is white.

2. He is rich or has rich “friends.”

[Anonymous]

3. His sister, Betsy, is in Trump's Cabinet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The guidelines confirm that Erik Prince lied to congress about the Seychelles meetings with Putin ally Dmitriev, the August 2016 meeting with Nader, Trump Jr, Zamel and, WikiLeaks.

How is he not in jail?

1. He is white.

2. He is rich or has rich “friends.”

A lot of people lie to congress and aren't prosecuted, even black people.

[Anonymous]

At 1:30 this morning, Trump tweeted about the harshness of Stone's sentencing guidelines, which went through much debate and vetting internally at DOJ.

This afternoon, the DOJ has indicated it will revise the guidelines to something much more lenient.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At 1:30 this morning, Trump tweeted about the harshness of Stone's sentencing guidelines, which went through much debate and vetting internally at DOJ.

This afternoon, the DOJ has indicated it will revise the guidelines to something much more lenient.

I smell a pardon

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:At 1:30 this morning, Trump tweeted about the harshness of Stone's sentencing guidelines, which went through much debate and vetting internally at DOJ.

This afternoon, the DOJ has indicated it will revise the guidelines to something much more lenient.

Note the part that says: This is not what was briefed to the dept.
It was a ridiculously harsh sentence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At 1:30 this morning, Trump tweeted about the harshness of Stone's sentencing guidelines, which went through much debate and vetting internally at DOJ.

This afternoon, the DOJ has indicated it will revise the guidelines to something much more lenient.

Note the part that says: This is not what was briefed to the dept.
It was a ridiculously harsh sentence.

Say Barr and his consiglieres.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At 1:30 this morning, Trump tweeted about the harshness of Stone's sentencing guidelines, which went through much debate and vetting internally at DOJ.

This afternoon, the DOJ has indicated it will revise the guidelines to something much more lenient.

Note the part that says: This is not what was briefed to the dept.
It was a ridiculously harsh sentence.

How so? If a woman can spend 5 years imprisioned for voting at the wrong precinct, how is this harsh?

[Anonymous]

I bet some more heads will roll at the DOJ. The sentencing is harsh due to Stones witness tampering before and during the trial. Don’t forget about his tweet of cross hairs on the judge. I hope Trump is all over this. Democrats will spin this all the way to the election. Trump needs to be shown that old men can indeed go to prison.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I bet some more heads will roll at the DOJ. The sentencing is harsh due to Stones witness tampering before and during the trial. Don’t forget about his tweet of cross hairs on the judge. I hope Trump is all over this. Democrats will spin this all the way to the election. Trump needs to be shown that old men can indeed go to prison.

What? He lied and his lies were material to other investigations.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At 1:30 this morning, Trump tweeted about the harshness of Stone's sentencing guidelines, which went through much debate and vetting internally at DOJ.

This afternoon, the DOJ has indicated it will revise the guidelines to something much more lenient.

Note the part that says: This is not what was briefed to the dept.
It was a ridiculously harsh sentence.

How so? If a woman can spend 5 years imprisioned for voting at the wrong precinct, how is this harsh?

+1
These poor sweet summer republicans. “Law and order,” my foot.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I bet some more heads will roll at the DOJ. The sentencing is harsh due to Stones witness tampering before and during the trial. Don’t forget about his tweet of cross hairs on the judge. I hope Trump is all over this. Democrats will spin this all the way to the election. Trump needs to be shown that old men can indeed go to prison.

What? He lied and his lies were material to other investigations.

Read it again. Stone serves jail. Trump’s interference is more proof of abuse of power. This is a good thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I bet some more heads will roll at the DOJ. The sentencing is harsh due to Stones witness tampering before and during the trial. Don’t forget about his tweet of cross hairs on the judge. I hope Trump is all over this. Democrats will spin this all the way to the election. Trump needs to be shown that old men can indeed go to prison.

What? He lied and his lies were material to other investigations.

Read it again. Stone serves jail. Trump’s interference is more proof of abuse of power. This is a good thing.

“Serves” should be “deserves”. No edit function here. ?

[Anonymous]

The Judge, not the DOJ, determines the sentence. That the DOJ is doing this at the behest of the White House, shows how shamless it is.

The beauty, if it is a "harsher" penalty, Trump will be more inclined to pardon Stone. A pardoned individual has to proffer to the crimes and has no Fifth Amendment rights in future testimony, including on Capitol Hill.

[Anonymous]

Aaron Zelinsky, one of Mueller’s prosecutors, just filed a notice to withdraw from the Stone case, the day that DOJ officials said they would override the line prosecutors and recommend a lower sentencing for the president’s longtime friend and campaign advisor.