2024 JonBenet Documentary

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents preferred JonBenet over Burke. JonBenet was Patsy’s pride and joy. Burke was jealous of the favoritism given to his sister and he lashed out when she grabbed his toys or ate his pineapples

And totally became a sadistic sexual offender? Ok.

Have you seen what little boys do with dolls? Yes he could’ve been a sadistic sexual offender to his little sister, and not just on that one night.

Do you have a source for this claim that this is normal for little boys? And normal that its a one time thing never seen again? Because i doubt you and won’t take your word for it.

DP but James Kolar listed sources in his book, foreign faction. It is rare but not at all of unheard of for boys around burkes age to have sexually assaulted and murdered. Furthermore, treatment for young kids with sexually aggressive behavior is usually very successful and can be completed in a few months or less (according to the sources in the book.)

The family also had books in the home that patsy’s mother had purchased for her about sexually aggressive kids and kids who were not able to tell right from wrong. I’m assuming she did not buy them for guidance on parenting jonbenet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents preferred JonBenet over Burke. JonBenet was Patsy’s pride and joy. Burke was jealous of the favoritism given to his sister and he lashed out when she grabbed his toys or ate his pineapples

And totally became a sadistic sexual offender? Ok.

Have you seen what little boys do with dolls? Yes he could’ve been a sadistic sexual offender to his little sister, and not just on that one night.

Do you have a source for this claim that this is normal for little boys? And normal that its a one time thing never seen again? Because i doubt you and won’t take your word for it.

DP but James Kolar listed sources in his book, foreign faction. It is rare but not at all of unheard of for boys around burkes age to have sexually assaulted and murdered. Furthermore, treatment for young kids with sexually aggressive behavior is usually very successful and can be completed in a few months or less (according to the sources in the book.)

The family also had books in the home that patsy’s mother had purchased for her about sexually aggressive kids and kids who were not able to tell right from wrong. I’m assuming she did not buy them for guidance on parenting jonbenet.

That’s not a source. You can’t just say what you want and pretend its a fact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents preferred JonBenet over Burke. JonBenet was Patsy’s pride and joy. Burke was jealous of the favoritism given to his sister and he lashed out when she grabbed his toys or ate his pineapples

And totally became a sadistic sexual offender? Ok.

Have you seen what little boys do with dolls? Yes he could’ve been a sadistic sexual offender to his little sister, and not just on that one night.

Do you have a source for this claim that this is normal for little boys? And normal that its a one time thing never seen again? Because i doubt you and won’t take your word for it.

DP but James Kolar listed sources in his book, foreign faction. It is rare but not at all of unheard of for boys around burkes age to have sexually assaulted and murdered. Furthermore, treatment for young kids with sexually aggressive behavior is usually very successful and can be completed in a few months or less (according to the sources in the book.)

The family also had books in the home that patsy’s mother had purchased for her about sexually aggressive kids and kids who were not able to tell right from wrong. I’m assuming she did not buy them for guidance on parenting jonbenet.

That’s not a source. You can’t just say what you want and pretend its a fact.

That’s right. He has documented sources in his book which you’d know if you read it.

[Anonymous]

I have no idea what happened.

But I see the evidence of the "cover-up" explanation. But one question I keep asking is: why didn't they actually remove her body?

If they wanted to fake the kidnapping, why stage her body in the house? Even in a moment of stress and panic, they would be know that she would be found quickly in the house.

And tbh, they dont seem dumb. They would know they that they would need to slink away and dispose of the body somewhere else

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents preferred JonBenet over Burke. JonBenet was Patsy’s pride and joy. Burke was jealous of the favoritism given to his sister and he lashed out when she grabbed his toys or ate his pineapples

And totally became a sadistic sexual offender? Ok.

Have you seen what little boys do with dolls? Yes he could’ve been a sadistic sexual offender to his little sister, and not just on that one night.

Do you have a source for this claim that this is normal for little boys? And normal that its a one time thing never seen again? Because i doubt you and won’t take your word for it.

DP but James Kolar listed sources in his book, foreign faction. It is rare but not at all of unheard of for boys around burkes age to have sexually assaulted and murdered. Furthermore, treatment for young kids with sexually aggressive behavior is usually very successful and can be completed in a few months or less (according to the sources in the book.)

The family also had books in the home that patsy’s mother had purchased for her about sexually aggressive kids and kids who were not able to tell right from wrong. I’m assuming she did not buy them for guidance on parenting jonbenet.

That’s not a source. You can’t just say what you want and pretend its a fact.

That’s right. He has documented sources in his book which you’d know if you read it.

He’s a nobody with a self published book. That’s not how it works. You must be James trying to drum up interest in your self serving book nobody read.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea what happened.

But I see the evidence of the "cover-up" explanation. But one question I keep asking is: why didn't they actually remove her body?

If they wanted to fake the kidnapping, why stage her body in the house? Even in a moment of stress and panic, they would be know that she would be found quickly in the house.

And tbh, they dont seem dumb. They would know they that they would need to slink away and dispose of the body somewhere else

I think the suitcase in the basement was intended to transport her somewhere. I don’t know what happened but obviously that didn’t materialize. I assume patsy ran out of time/couldn't bring herself to dispose of the body/had no discreet and quick way to do it and John was not in the picture until he woke up early the next morning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just went down this rabbit hole, and now finally understand why people are still fascinated as it is one of the strangest stories I've ever heard. If it were an outsider who committed the murder I find it hard to believe that there has not been enough DNA to find a match. Which leaves me to think that the DNA they did find was of the trace kind you find everywhere incidentally.

I had no opinion before, but after reading all the evidence I have the camp of people who believe Burke did it. I know there's not enough evidence for a court of law, but too many lines point to Burke in my mind.

1) His strange and emotionless behavior in the video interview with the psychologist. I know some kids show odd behavior but this was reallllly odd. My kid, at age 4, showed more distress when discussing her dead cat.
2) he previously hit his sister with a golf club hard enough to leave a scar, and a family friend said he was prone to anger issues
3) his scatolia and the fact that they found a candy box belonging to his sister with his feces smeared on it. This is not typical, healthy behavior for a 9yo
4) the pineapple bowl and clear glass had his prints on them and JonBenet had eaten fresh pineapple matching what was in the bowl
5) the toy train track marks on her body, the SA with the paintbrush handle, the strange and incompetent way her hands were bound all suggest a juvenile aggressor
6) I do not see how he could be cleared on the basis of DNA evidence when there wasn't enough DNA evidence to implicate anyone

The ransom note is one of the most bizarre things I have ever seen. If Burke did it, we can only conclude that Patsy wrote the note to deflect blame on an outsider. But why on earth is it so bizarre and rambling?

But your kid isn't on the spectrum, right? Pretty normal for a kid with HFASD.

I grew up with a severely brother autistic brother, almost non-verbal, and he never beat me with a golf club or smeared feces on the wall or on my things. It's quite likely Burke is on the spectrum from what I've seen, but that doesn't mean he doesn't have other severe psychiatric issues that made him a danger to his little sister.

The golf club seems like such an overreaction. Siblings fight and hit each other. This isn’t really that interesting if that was the one incident from a few years prior.

+1 Same with the feces smearing. One recorded incident, nothing else confirmed much less proven.

Yeah, this is my problem with this case is that there’s so much conjecture and rumors out there. You can go on one Reddit thread and he had a major problem smearing feces, but then you go on another and it was a one time issue and the box of candy was never tested and could’ve been chocolate… So who knows how extensive his issues really were.

It’s the same with the rumor that there were three people talking on the 911 call. People keep saying this, but the only actual recording I found online is the one where Patsy hangs up and you can hear her say please help me Jesus. Which actually seems like a rational thing to say in the situation. I’ve never heard recordings that sound even remotely like there are other people talking. I’m not denying that this is true, but where are they?

At this point it’s hard to know what were rumors that got out of hand and what are facts.

I think the defamation cases that were won or settled are really telling. It seems the Ramseys have been successful with those which makes it seem irresponsible of those writing books and making documentaries saying things like Burke did it. It’s all conjecture and no one knows.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents preferred JonBenet over Burke. JonBenet was Patsy’s pride and joy. Burke was jealous of the favoritism given to his sister and he lashed out when she grabbed his toys or ate his pineapples

And totally became a sadistic sexual offender? Ok.

Have you seen what little boys do with dolls? Yes he could’ve been a sadistic sexual offender to his little sister, and not just on that one night.

Do you have a source for this claim that this is normal for little boys? And normal that its a one time thing never seen again? Because i doubt you and won’t take your word for it.

DP but James Kolar listed sources in his book, foreign faction. It is rare but not at all of unheard of for boys around burkes age to have sexually assaulted and murdered. Furthermore, treatment for young kids with sexually aggressive behavior is usually very successful and can be completed in a few months or less (according to the sources in the book.)

The family also had books in the home that patsy’s mother had purchased for her about sexually aggressive kids and kids who were not able to tell right from wrong. I’m assuming she did not buy them for guidance on parenting jonbenet.

That’s not a source. You can’t just say what you want and pretend its a fact.

That’s right. He has documented sources in his book which you’d know if you read it.

He’s a nobody with a self published book. That’s not how it works. You must be James trying to drum up interest in your self serving book nobody read.

Lol I love this go to response on dcum when someone dissents. “Oh look, Mila kunis/ashton Kutcher/kate Middleton/Prince Andrew/taylor swift/Hilaria Baldwin/the pope are here defending themselves.”

I am most certainly not James kolar. But I was interested in the case about ten years ago and thought his book held the best logical explanation of what transpired. And he’s not a nobody, he was the lead investigator on the case in the early 2000s and knows a lot more than you or I.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I have no idea what happened.

But I see the evidence of the "cover-up" explanation. But one question I keep asking is: why didn't they actually remove her body?

If they wanted to fake the kidnapping, why stage her body in the house? Even in a moment of stress and panic, they would be know that she would be found quickly in the house.

And tbh, they dont seem dumb. They would know they that they would need to slink away and dispose of the body somewhere else

You're obviously not in the right state of mind when doing something like this. Either way, the letter is the smoking gun: the late mom wrote it. Everything else is noise.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents preferred JonBenet over Burke. JonBenet was Patsy’s pride and joy. Burke was jealous of the favoritism given to his sister and he lashed out when she grabbed his toys or ate his pineapples

And totally became a sadistic sexual offender? Ok.

Have you seen what little boys do with dolls? Yes he could’ve been a sadistic sexual offender to his little sister, and not just on that one night.

Do you have a source for this claim that this is normal for little boys? And normal that its a one time thing never seen again? Because i doubt you and won’t take your word for it.

DP but James Kolar listed sources in his book, foreign faction. It is rare but not at all of unheard of for boys around burkes age to have sexually assaulted and murdered. Furthermore, treatment for young kids with sexually aggressive behavior is usually very successful and can be completed in a few months or less (according to the sources in the book.)

The family also had books in the home that patsy’s mother had purchased for her about sexually aggressive kids and kids who were not able to tell right from wrong. I’m assuming she did not buy them for guidance on parenting jonbenet.

That’s not a source. You can’t just say what you want and pretend its a fact.

That’s right. He has documented sources in his book which you’d know if you read it.

He’s a nobody with a self published book. That’s not how it works. You must be James trying to drum up interest in your self serving book nobody read.

Lol I love this go to response on dcum when someone dissents. “Oh look, Mila kunis/ashton Kutcher/kate Middleton/Prince Andrew/taylor swift/Hilaria Baldwin/the pope are here defending themselves.”

I am most certainly not James kolar. But I was interested in the case about ten years ago and thought his book held the best logical explanation of what transpired. And he’s not a nobody, he was the lead investigator on the case in the early 2000s and knows a lot more than you or I.

The lead investigator from the department that completely bungled the crime scene? He’s a clown.

[Anonymous]

I always thought the brother did it and one or both parents covered it up rather than lose both children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I always thought the brother did it and one or both parents covered it up rather than lose both children.

Pretty much. They lawyered up immediately and wouldn't let police talk to the boy for over a year?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents preferred JonBenet over Burke. JonBenet was Patsy’s pride and joy. Burke was jealous of the favoritism given to his sister and he lashed out when she grabbed his toys or ate his pineapples

And totally became a sadistic sexual offender? Ok.

Have you seen what little boys do with dolls? Yes he could’ve been a sadistic sexual offender to his little sister, and not just on that one night.

Do you have a source for this claim that this is normal for little boys? And normal that its a one time thing never seen again? Because i doubt you and won’t take your word for it.

DP but James Kolar listed sources in his book, foreign faction. It is rare but not at all of unheard of for boys around burkes age to have sexually assaulted and murdered. Furthermore, treatment for young kids with sexually aggressive behavior is usually very successful and can be completed in a few months or less (according to the sources in the book.)

The family also had books in the home that patsy’s mother had purchased for her about sexually aggressive kids and kids who were not able to tell right from wrong. I’m assuming she did not buy them for guidance on parenting jonbenet.

That’s not a source. You can’t just say what you want and pretend its a fact.

That’s right. He has documented sources in his book which you’d know if you read it.

He’s a nobody with a self published book. That’s not how it works. You must be James trying to drum up interest in your self serving book nobody read.

Lol I love this go to response on dcum when someone dissents. “Oh look, Mila kunis/ashton Kutcher/kate Middleton/Prince Andrew/taylor swift/Hilaria Baldwin/the pope are here defending themselves.”

I am most certainly not James kolar. But I was interested in the case about ten years ago and thought his book held the best logical explanation of what transpired. And he’s not a nobody, he was the lead investigator on the case in the early 2000s and knows a lot more than you or I.

The lead investigator from the department that completely bungled the crime scene? He’s a clown.

He came on to the case years after the initial team bungled the crime scene. He had to clean up the mess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents preferred JonBenet over Burke. JonBenet was Patsy’s pride and joy. Burke was jealous of the favoritism given to his sister and he lashed out when she grabbed his toys or ate his pineapples

And totally became a sadistic sexual offender? Ok.

Have you seen what little boys do with dolls? Yes he could’ve been a sadistic sexual offender to his little sister, and not just on that one night.

Do you have a source for this claim that this is normal for little boys? And normal that its a one time thing never seen again? Because i doubt you and won’t take your word for it.

DP but James Kolar listed sources in his book, foreign faction. It is rare but not at all of unheard of for boys around burkes age to have sexually assaulted and murdered. Furthermore, treatment for young kids with sexually aggressive behavior is usually very successful and can be completed in a few months or less (according to the sources in the book.)

The family also had books in the home that patsy’s mother had purchased for her about sexually aggressive kids and kids who were not able to tell right from wrong. I’m assuming she did not buy them for guidance on parenting jonbenet.

That’s not a source. You can’t just say what you want and pretend its a fact.

That’s right. He has documented sources in his book which you’d know if you read it.

He’s a nobody with a self published book. That’s not how it works. You must be James trying to drum up interest in your self serving book nobody read.

Lol I love this go to response on dcum when someone dissents. “Oh look, Mila kunis/ashton Kutcher/kate Middleton/Prince Andrew/taylor swift/Hilaria Baldwin/the pope are here defending themselves.”

I am most certainly not James kolar. But I was interested in the case about ten years ago and thought his book held the best logical explanation of what transpired. And he’s not a nobody, he was the lead investigator on the case in the early 2000s and knows a lot more than you or I.

The lead investigator from the department that completely bungled the crime scene? He’s a clown.

He came on to the case years after the initial team bungled the crime scene. He had to clean up the mess.

The mess isn’t exactly cleared up is it? This is a cold case if you recall.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The parents preferred JonBenet over Burke. JonBenet was Patsy’s pride and joy. Burke was jealous of the favoritism given to his sister and he lashed out when she grabbed his toys or ate his pineapples

And totally became a sadistic sexual offender? Ok.

Have you seen what little boys do with dolls? Yes he could’ve been a sadistic sexual offender to his little sister, and not just on that one night.

Do you have a source for this claim that this is normal for little boys? And normal that its a one time thing never seen again? Because i doubt you and won’t take your word for it.

DP but James Kolar listed sources in his book, foreign faction. It is rare but not at all of unheard of for boys around burkes age to have sexually assaulted and murdered. Furthermore, treatment for young kids with sexually aggressive behavior is usually very successful and can be completed in a few months or less (according to the sources in the book.)

The family also had books in the home that patsy’s mother had purchased for her about sexually aggressive kids and kids who were not able to tell right from wrong. I’m assuming she did not buy them for guidance on parenting jonbenet.

That’s not a source. You can’t just say what you want and pretend its a fact.

That’s right. He has documented sources in his book which you’d know if you read it.

He’s a nobody with a self published book. That’s not how it works. You must be James trying to drum up interest in your self serving book nobody read.

Lol I love this go to response on dcum when someone dissents. “Oh look, Mila kunis/ashton Kutcher/kate Middleton/Prince Andrew/taylor swift/Hilaria Baldwin/the pope are here defending themselves.”

I am most certainly not James kolar. But I was interested in the case about ten years ago and thought his book held the best logical explanation of what transpired. And he’s not a nobody, he was the lead investigator on the case in the early 2000s and knows a lot more than you or I.

The lead investigator from the department that completely bungled the crime scene? He’s a clown.

He came on to the case years after the initial team bungled the crime scene. He had to clean up the mess.

The mess isn’t exactly cleared up is it? This is a cold case if you recall.

It’s never going to be cleared up because the crime scene was contaminated. But in my opinion kolar (and the grand jury) pieced together the most plausible scenario of what happened.