2024 JonBenet Documentary

[Anonymous]

The way she was SAd reminds me of other cases where children assault other children. I know this is a really disturbing part of the case and one we’d like not to think about but I actually don’t see the parents doing this. Not because parents don’t assault their children, just due to the way it was done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’ve been in the “Burke did it” camp for a while but the new documentary certainly makes the Karr guy seem like the one. The DNA, from previous documentaries, is so minuscule that it’s irrelevant, and likely contaminated, so I don’t see how “the DNA doesn’t match him” matters at all. There is no DNA evidence at all as far as I’m concerned. Until the police test more things!!!

The documentary was misleading on that. I looked it up because I found him being exonerated by DNA only weird considering how slim the DNA was. Turns out he was not in Boulder at the time of the murder. He was in Alabama So it was a waste of time having it in there.

Oh seriously?? Then why did they spend like half an hour on him? Including making us listen to that absolutely disgusting audio of what was apparently not a confession but his depraved fantasy? That is super misleading, they definitely made it seem like he was exonerated based on the flimsy DNA

I'm confused why you think they make documentaries based on truth or reason? The producers will do and say anythimg to get suckers like you to watch i.e.; sensationalism, in the hopes you might talk about it online, which you did, in order to make more people watch the program, thus selling more ad time

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The ransom note seems super fake and so I gotta believe it was the parents either doing it or covering it up.

This is the single hardest sell for me. I find it so hard to believe Patsy didn’t write it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The way she was SAd reminds me of other cases where children assault other children. I know this is a really disturbing part of the case and one we’d like not to think about but I actually don’t see the parents doing this. Not because parents don’t assault their children, just due to the way it was done.

Yes, I don't want to get into any graphic details, but using a paintbrush as opposed to... some part of the body let's say... to do that kind of thing makes me believe it was not an adult male. It was either a woman, or a prepubescent male.

[Anonymous]

The DA cleared the Ramsey family due to lack of evidence. They need to move on and look at the other evidence like testing all the items. Why wouldn’t they?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There wasn't any evidence of an intruder, or break-in. It's pretty obvious from the letter, the parents behavior, and many others things it was one of the three people that lived in the home.

Honestly I wanted to believe John during the documentary but the Karr story didn’t tackle the ransom note AT ALL. In fact, no one did. So I’m not satisfied that Patsy and John had nothing to do with that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The DA cleared the Ramsey family due to lack of evidence. They need to move on and look at the other evidence like testing all the items. Why wouldn’t they?

I don’t think they have enough DNA evidence to say it was anyone, Ramseys or otherwise.

People were all over the crime scene, the body was touched and moved by her father, and the small amounts of unknown touch DNA or the clothing fibers left by her parents on the body aren’t enough to prove who did this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There wasn't any evidence of an intruder, or break-in. It's pretty obvious from the letter, the parents behavior, and many others things it was one of the three people that lived in the home.

Honestly I wanted to believe John during the documentary but the Karr story didn’t tackle the ransom note AT ALL. In fact, no one did. So I’m not satisfied that Patsy and John had nothing to do with that.

Also, Karr was not in Boulder at the time of the murder, that was firmly established

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There wasn't any evidence of an intruder, or break-in. It's pretty obvious from the letter, the parents behavior, and many others things it was one of the three people that lived in the home.

Honestly I wanted to believe John during the documentary but the Karr story didn’t tackle the ransom note AT ALL. In fact, no one did. So I’m not satisfied that Patsy and John had nothing to do with that.

Also, Karr was not in Boulder at the time of the murder, that was firmly established

Insinuating that it was somehow him cemented for me that the whole thing was totally one sided and purely an effort to drive suspicion away from the family instead of a good faith attempt find out who did it.

Also they keep saying DNA evidence firmly ruled out the Ramseys and others but…how? They don’t have any good DNA evidence to work with

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The DA cleared the Ramsey family due to lack of evidence. They need to move on and look at the other evidence like testing all the items. Why wouldn’t they?

I don’t think they have enough DNA evidence to say it was anyone, Ramseys or otherwise.

People were all over the crime scene, the body was touched and moved by her father, and the small amounts of unknown touch DNA or the clothing fibers left by her parents on the body aren’t enough to prove who did this.

So test what they have and prove it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The DA cleared the Ramsey family due to lack of evidence. They need to move on and look at the other evidence like testing all the items. Why wouldn’t they?

I don’t think they have enough DNA evidence to say it was anyone, Ramseys or otherwise.

People were all over the crime scene, the body was touched and moved by her father, and the small amounts of unknown touch DNA or the clothing fibers left by her parents on the body aren’t enough to prove who did this.

So test what they have and prove it.

For anyone who knows anything about dna: what would we find with partial trace dna testing in 2024 that wasn’t uncovered in the last round of testing in 2018 or in 2009 or whenever they last tested each sample? Is the concern with another round of testing that it would use up the small samples we do have?

It sounds like so far we have trace dna from 2 different males but not enough to narrow down who it came from. Also, I don’t understand the importance of trace dna, if it is all over everyone all the time and you pick it up everywhere, how is this helpful?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The DA cleared the Ramsey family due to lack of evidence. They need to move on and look at the other evidence like testing all the items. Why wouldn’t they?

I don’t think they have enough DNA evidence to say it was anyone, Ramseys or otherwise.

People were all over the crime scene, the body was touched and moved by her father, and the small amounts of unknown touch DNA or the clothing fibers left by her parents on the body aren’t enough to prove who did this.

So test what they have and prove it.

For anyone who knows anything about dna: what would we find with partial trace dna testing in 2024 that wasn’t uncovered in the last round of testing in 2018 or in 2009 or whenever they last tested each sample? Is the concern with another round of testing that it would use up the small samples we do have?

It sounds like so far we have trace dna from 2 different males but not enough to narrow down who it came from. Also, I don’t understand the importance of trace dna, if it is all over everyone all the time and you pick it up everywhere, how is this helpful?

Apparently they never tested all the items. Why not?

[Anonymous]

Also no mention at al of the pineapple in her stomach. An intruder fed he the pineapple? I don’t think so.

[Anonymous]

John is guilty as sin, period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:John is guilty as sin, period.

So was Patsy covering for him when she write the ransom note? Did she think it was an accident? Or did she know about the SA and was afraid of him?