2024 JonBenet Documentary

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she was SAd reminds me of other cases where children assault other children. I know this is a really disturbing part of the case and one we’d like not to think about but I actually don’t see the parents doing this. Not because parents don’t assault their children, just due to the way it was done.

Yes, I don't want to get into any graphic details, but using a paintbrush as opposed to... some part of the body let's say... to do that kind of thing makes me believe it was not an adult male. It was either a woman, or a prepubescent male.

Agree.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way she was SAd reminds me of other cases where children assault other children. I know this is a really disturbing part of the case and one we’d like not to think about but I actually don’t see the parents doing this. Not because parents don’t assault their children, just due to the way it was done.

Yes, I don't want to get into any graphic details, but using a paintbrush as opposed to... some part of the body let's say... to do that kind of thing makes me believe it was not an adult male. It was either a woman, or a prepubescent male.

Agree.

Plus the ransom note and no evidence of an intruder. The only thing that makes sense to me is Burke plus parental coverup.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:While I understand that, to get the interview, it had to heavily biased, it rehashed the same info that’s been out forever and clearly had an agenda.

Does anyone have a rec for a podcast or doc that fully explores all theories without trying to promote one as the truth?

The Tubi TV doc is good for this - only thing JB’s dad was part of it, but they do explore all the theories and suspects.

[Anonymous]

What about the basement window being smashed and the suitcase underneath?

[Anonymous]

Why would John Ramsey keep pushing the police to test items for DNA if he was involved? Wouldn’t he have slunk away by now if he knew what really happened? It’s not like OJ was seriously asking questions trying to solve Nicole’s murder after he was found not guilty. Plus that police officer was convinced he was the murderer even though the popular theory is that Burke might have done it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What about the basement window being smashed and the suitcase underneath?

John Ramsay said he broke one window pane himself, months before when he was locked out of the house. There were undisturbed cobwebs on it the day of the murder. There was nothing out of the ordinary about the suitcase against the wall.

https://www.tumblr.com/scienceofreasoning/176046574490/boulder-pd-finds-ramsey-house-basement-train

[Anonymous]

Intruder. The parents did not kill their child, nor did the brother.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why would John Ramsey keep pushing the police to test items for DNA if he was involved? Wouldn’t he have slunk away by now if he knew what really happened? It’s not like OJ was seriously asking questions trying to solve Nicole’s murder after he was found not guilty. Plus that police officer was convinced he was the murderer even though the popular theory is that Burke might have done it.

Because he was emboldened by the fact that it did not below to members of the family. Even though the minuscule amount of DNA is thought most likely to be touch DNA from the manufacturing of the underpants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Intruder. The parents did not kill their child, nor did the brother.

Not one bit of an evidence there was an intruder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why would John Ramsey keep pushing the police to test items for DNA if he was involved? Wouldn’t he have slunk away by now if he knew what really happened? It’s not like OJ was seriously asking questions trying to solve Nicole’s murder after he was found not guilty. Plus that police officer was convinced he was the murderer even though the popular theory is that Burke might have done it.

Because he was emboldened by the fact that it did not below to members of the family. Even though the minuscule amount of DNA is thought most likely to be touch DNA from the manufacturing of the underpants.

So test it anyway. What have they got to lose?. The Boulder police dragging their feet is ridiculous. There needs to be new and objective eyes on this case.

[Anonymous]

I think it's possible Patsy DID write the note but an intruder committed the murder. Why would she write the note? They wake up and can't find JonBenet anywhere. Total panic. How will this look? How did we, a perfect family not notice our own child go missing in the night? Police will think we did something. Let's write a note so they take her missing seriously AND don't blame us and move on to find her. Is it rational? Not at all. But it's possible. Also telling the note was left at the bottom of their inner staircase. She wanted to create the impression she found the note upon waking and before looking for JonBenet. Why else leave the note at the bottom of these stairs and not in the kitchen or other stairs? Once the story explodes and body is found, it's simply impossible to backtrack on the note.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it's possible Patsy DID write the note but an intruder committed the murder. Why would she write the note? They wake up and can't find JonBenet anywhere. Total panic. How will this look? How did we, a perfect family not notice our own child go missing in the night? Police will think we did something. Let's write a note so they take her missing seriously AND don't blame us and move on to find her. Is it rational? Not at all. But it's possible. Also telling the note was left at the bottom of their inner staircase. She wanted to create the impression she found the note upon waking and before looking for JonBenet. Why else leave the note at the bottom of these stairs and not in the kitchen or other stairs? Once the story explodes and body is found, it's simply impossible to backtrack on the note.

No, I don’t think this is plausible at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's possible Patsy DID write the note but an intruder committed the murder. Why would she write the note? They wake up and can't find JonBenet anywhere. Total panic. How will this look? How did we, a perfect family not notice our own child go missing in the night? Police will think we did something. Let's write a note so they take her missing seriously AND don't blame us and move on to find her. Is it rational? Not at all. But it's possible. Also telling the note was left at the bottom of their inner staircase. She wanted to create the impression she found the note upon waking and before looking for JonBenet. Why else leave the note at the bottom of these stairs and not in the kitchen or other stairs? Once the story explodes and body is found, it's simply impossible to backtrack on the note.

No, I don’t think this is plausible at all.

The issue for me is it isn't plausible either for the killer to have written the note: too much inside knowledge, no purpose to it whatsoever (why ask for a ransom when you know they'll find the body?), placement of the note indicates familiarity with family habits. The note and murder seem separate from one another.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Intruder. The parents did not kill their child, nor did the brother.

Not one bit of an evidence there was an intruder.

That's already been proven. Most handwriting analysis agreed that was Patsy's writing in the so called ransom note.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it's possible Patsy DID write the note but an intruder committed the murder. Why would she write the note? They wake up and can't find JonBenet anywhere. Total panic. How will this look? How did we, a perfect family not notice our own child go missing in the night? Police will think we did something. Let's write a note so they take her missing seriously AND don't blame us and move on to find her. Is it rational? Not at all. But it's possible. Also telling the note was left at the bottom of their inner staircase. She wanted to create the impression she found the note upon waking and before looking for JonBenet. Why else leave the note at the bottom of these stairs and not in the kitchen or other stairs? Once the story explodes and body is found, it's simply impossible to backtrack on the note.

No, I don’t think this is plausible at all.

+1 The only plausible context for the note is desperate cover-up by Patsy.