Will Trump drop Vance?

[Anonymous]

Trump should ask him why as a military veteran and recent law graduate living in SF (?) did he “hate cops” in 2014? This is weird.

[Anonymous]

There's now an official betting market for replacing Vance. This is not a good sign.

https://polymarket.com/event/jd-vance-steps-down-as-republican-vp-nominee

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's now an official betting market for replacing Vance. This is not a good sign.

https://polymarket.com/event/jd-vance-steps-down-as-republican-vp-nominee

He’d better hurry. He really is running out of time, though he should be forced to carry Vance to term.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If he sticks with Vance, MAGA suspects Trump picked the doughboy creep to lose on purpose.

They think Burgum would be a winner, though? Weird.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump should ask him why as a military veteran and recent law graduate living in SF (?) did he “hate cops” in 2014? This is weird.

It keeps getting better and better with this guy.

[Anonymous]

Is Vance still a Senator? Or did he have to resign his seat?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Do we HONESTLY think Trump thought Vance of all people was a great pick to win?

Lately Trump has been changing his thoughts on a lot of things depending what the nearest weird billionaire tells him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If he sticks with Vance, MAGA suspects Trump picked the doughboy creep to lose on purpose.

Trump isn’t a deep thinker. Until Biden dropped out he was convinced he was running away to a landslide.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There's now an official betting market for replacing Vance. This is not a good sign.

https://polymarket.com/event/jd-vance-steps-down-as-republican-vp-nominee

He’d better hurry. He really is running out of time, though he should be forced to carry Vance to term.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tulsi gabber would be a good pick

She sure would: Russian collaborator and Putin tool. #UsefulIdiot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Do we HONESTLY think Trump thought Vance of all people was a great pick to win?

Lately Trump has been changing his thoughts on a lot of things depending what the nearest weird billionaire tells him.

That's the problem with selling your soul. New bidders keep showing up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Don't count out Governor DeSantis. Per earlier post, folks will soon learn he's gone back to pronouncing his last name as DeeSantis. (He only used the short-e version (i.e., 'Dih-Santis') to appease liberals, and they didn't reciprocate.) He's staying with same spelling, just pronouncing with with a long-e: DeeSantis. There's a lot of enthusiasm inside the camp for this move.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is Vance still a Senator? Or did he have to resign his seat?

JD did have to resign his seat, but he got a couch in return. A plush, velvety one. #passion

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Don't count out Governor DeSantis. Per earlier post, folks will soon learn he's gone back to pronouncing his last name as DeeSantis. (He only used the short-e version (i.e., 'Dih-Santis') to appease liberals, and they didn't reciprocate.) He's staying with same spelling, just pronouncing with with a long-e: DeeSantis. There's a lot of enthusiasm inside the camp for this move.

So the problem with DeSantis is a short 'e' in his name, and not that he comes off as a profoundly weird dude?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Don't count out Governor DeSantis. Per earlier post, folks will soon learn he's gone back to pronouncing his last name as DeeSantis. (He only used the short-e version (i.e., 'Dih-Santis') to appease liberals, and they didn't reciprocate.) He's staying with same spelling, just pronouncing with with a long-e: DeeSantis. There's a lot of enthusiasm inside the camp for this move.

So the problem with DeSantis is a short 'e' in his name, and not that he comes off as a profoundly weird dude?

Enough with the attacks on Gov. DeSantis. Not long ago, people were routinely using inappropriate terms like dickweed, douchebag, and human repellent to describe him, while failing to offer any substantive policy critiques. It's disappointing to see this kind of behavior still exists. Let's be better.

Anonymous wrote: