
“Trump campaign officials acknowledged that Trump selected the inexperienced Vance, charged with all his techno-authoritarian ideas, to boost support among their own base, not extend a hand to swing voters, according to The Atlantic. Vance was a symbol of the Trump team’s assuredness that they would win in 2024. Come Sunday, that assuredness appears to be shrinking.” https://newrepublic.com/post/184106/trump-picking-jd-vance-mistake-biden-kamala-harris And this is the Atlantic article referenced https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2024/07/trump-campaign-biden-dropping-out/679183/ |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
It will be interesting. Clearly, he will play favorites. |
LOL |
+1 |
You are confusing tech with Wall Street. |
I LOL’d too. Because… Schroedenger’s POTUS? |
Wall St wants lower taxes. Look who was floated for Treasury Sec (Jamie Dimon) Tech wants no regulation |
Peter Thiel is a major Vance backer. Thiel or his funds have a finger in every major Silicon Valley company and many outside of it. Thiel is (reprehensible and) hugely influential. So no, the business community does not hate Vance. Meanwhile, it’s unlikely that either nominee on the ticket can be changed at this stage. Even if he drops out or dies, his name is on the ticket. They’re locked in. If you think he is disliked, that should be good news. As for Harris momentum, we have yet to see; just too early to tell. She had an early spike of interest and enthusiasm but so would almost any Biden replacement. “Momentum” is probably overstating the case at only two days into her candidacy. |
Also the oldest failson liked him the best. |
I’m not surprised, he’s basically a 4th Trump child (I’m not counting Barron and Tiffany) |
How can he? Vance will not go quietly and he is a snake that would turn on Trump saying his original feelings about trump were correct. |
What if Vance voluntarily drops out for personal reasons? |
new republic is not a credible source. The Atlantic link has a paywall. Besides, nothing in the new republic article mentions anything you are claiming. You are spreading disinformation. “Most striking thing I heard from Trump allies yesterday was the second-guessing of JD Vance—a selection, they acknowledged, that was [born] of cockiness, meant to run up margins with the base in a blowout rather than persuade swing voters in a nail-biter,” Atlantic staff writer Tim Alberta, who had written the piece about the panicking Trump campaign, posted on X (formerly Twitter). Who? Names? Who are the Trump “allies” being used as sources? First the author claims he heard from the trump campaign, then Trump allies. But all sources are completely anonymous. There may be more information behind the paywall, but new republic has nothing so meh, neither does The Atlantic. Nice try. |
I think momentum is an understatement. Right now the enthusiasm is sucking up all the air on media platforms. Having said that, there is a lot of daylight between now and November for anyone in this election dramedy to make a major gaff (candidates, current president or close associates) or have a major health event (eg, heart attack in former or current president - unlikely for Harris). In either event things will get reshuffled again. |