|
"...people make a tidy living giving corporate presentations on this type of stuff. I just sat through one for course credits and he specifically characterized Boomers as spending everything they've got before they die and "sliding in [to the grave] with the wheels on fire." ... leaving nothing behind is a legitimate characteristic of that generation. As are selfishness, failure to protect the environment, and general sense that public goods (land, public services, etc) are to be used up by them without thought to leaving anything for other people."
"The training I sat through had an interesting bit about the rewards each generation finds most motivating. The generation before Boomers valued security over all, the Boomers value status, older Gen X value knowledge, younger Gen X and older Gen Y value inclusion, and younger Gen Y value freedom." I hope your company has a great legal team. If they officially supported this training they are supporting age discrimination. If younger generations value "knowledge, inclusion" then someone younger should have stood up and said NO STEREOTYPES are acceptable including those related to age. |
“Age-based prejudice is the last acceptable form of prejudice,” says New York University’s Michael North, who studies ageism in the workplace. “People are making age-based generalizations and stereotypes that you wouldn’t be able to get away with about race or background. Insert some sort of racial or ethnic group, or ‘OK Woman,’ and it wouldn’t go over too well.” |
| didn't boomers themselves come up with "don't trust anyone over 30"? |
gen x is pretty much the least selfish generation. We don't give AF but we aren't hoarding all the Fs. |
Medium-range Gen X here and jesus, I'm just happy I finally paid off my stupid student loans! I don't need much anything else. Inclusion, knowledge, whatever. Well, a bit of money for retirement would be good. |
I think one of the funniest things about Boomers is how they absolutely refuse to acknowledge there's anything funny about Boomers I say this as someone who loves many Boomers. My beloved parents are Boomers (actually a bit older, but that's their generation culturally speaking). I adore their friends. And at the same time - my lord people, look in the mirror once in a while! |
Nope. That was Jack Weinberg, who was a Berkeley activist. He was born in 1940. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Weinberg Pretty much as soon as Boomers could vote, they were as conservative as their parents. |
Speaking as a boomer parent, no, don't see the humor. |
Thanks for posting this! |
What bothers me is generalizing about people based on their generation, period -- regardless of whether it's young or old people. We wouldn't do that based on race or gender or sexual orientation but people think this is okay. |
That's cool. Do you say that to your friends of other races as well? |
Sorry we didn't die off fast enough for you. |
Do you say that to your Black friends when White performers dress up like them and make "a little joke"? |
Michael North share the common academic affliction that if he's not studying it, it's not there. And anytime someone refers to anything as the "last acceptable prejudice," you know you're looking at someone who is fine with their own various forms of privilege and fuming about the ones they don't have. |
DP here. Maybe it's not the "last" acceptable prejudice (FTR there are some others out there like classism), but it's certainly considered acceptable. And seriously, pp, you are fine with this? It sounds like you're the one who is fine with your own form of privilege. Folks, it's wrong to stereotype people based on their age (whether young or old) just as it's wrong to do it based on race, class, nationality, religion, gender, sexual orientation, etc. I will continue to defend young people against attacks from other people who make sweeping generalizations about them. Will you do the same for older people as well as young people? Or is that ruining your fun? |