Ok so basically you don't care how it effects the less fortunate because you are able to prepare and cancel your Netflix account. Got it. You clearly have no idea how people less privileged than you live. |
Don't tell this to the Trumpkins. They hate it when you educate them. |
| It’s not about if a person cares or not. There isn’t enough funding in the social programs to cover the expenses/“needs”. People now need to start helping others. This will take a village but expecting the government to provide the childcare services etc in the US isn’t going to happen anytime soon. I’m not saying this shouldn’t be a reform but in the next few years, this isn’t going to happen. We need to help each other out. Neighbors helping neighbors. Families helping families etc. Assuming someone else is going to sweep in and figured out a solution that allows us to go back to the way we were isn’t going to happen. Not planning is our worse enemy right now. |
| Why is it more important to keep every large blueberry farm in NJ populated with migrant workers, who are bringing the virus with them from Mexico and FLA than to get our kids back into school? Seriously, of all the activities that are deemed essential--even when a great risk is posed, kids in school is at the bottom of the list. It makes no sense. |
The economy won't begin to fire on all cylinders until school is open. Contrary to your insistent refrain, there is no all-day daycare for elementary age students. Do you think it is realistic to expect folks to hire full-time personal child care help to provide a safe environment for kids? Inexpensive alternatives, including having the older sibling watch the younger, have a lot of risks. |
DP. As a European (and decidedly non-Trumpkin), I find it quite interesting to see so many supposedly liberal Americans suddenly argue against subsidized childcare (which public schools obviously are), now that the idea clashes with their version of a virtuous pandemic response. Or was it always your position that nobody should be able to rely on the government for the care of even just school-aged kids? |
Lobbyist for the agricultural industry. Unless we lobby for teachers to be essential front line workers, this stance isn’t going to change soon. Trust me, teachers union are lobbying that education is an essential function but can be provide by remote mechanism. A nuance nut a huge distinction - teachers as frontline essential workers versus education is an essential function (can be done remote). Other option is to get other lobbying groups (Manufacturing etc) to recognize their industry they represent will tank if child care via in person schools aren’t provided. Any which way we look at, LOBBYING is what gets policy implemented which requires access to $$$ |
This is exactly right. Kids don't have a lobby. They are our most vulnerable citizens. They depend on adults to make decisions in their best interest. The adults in charge are failing them. |
|
Back to school, inside the school, in January 2022. My guess - and it's only a guess -- is that there will be a widely available vaccine by then. Now, whether it's 50%, 75% or 100% effective is anyone's guess. But its existence will remove the "not until there is a vaccine" objection to full-time, in-person school.
I also think that by Fall 2021 there will be two options for families: 1) Full time in-person instruction in school or 2) Full-time distance learning. It'll take a year to shake out which teachers are willing to teach in person without a vaccine, and which aren't, with some of the former retiring or quitting and school systems hiring more of the latter. I also think that by being able to offer those two options, the school system will finally be able to squelch the in-person vs. distance learning debate, and the vitriol that accompanies it. You want in-person? Sign up for that. You don't? OK, check the DL box. Then you can distribute teachers accordingly, with higher risk teachers (or those who just aren't comfortable teaching in person) handling the DL classes in each grade level. |
The question is why are they not doing this right now? There would probably be a lot more people signing up voluntarily for DL right now than next year, so it will be easier to implement. |
I don't really see why they can't offer those 2 choices now? It would cost the school system much less money to have the choice for full time in school or full time DL as options and whoever wants each option signs up. Those that choose f2f can sign a waiver that they are willing to accept the risks associated with that. The numbers keep getting better in MD (despite the doom and gloom posters that seem to want to continuously debate with the statistical facts). |
PP again. Here is a superintendent suggesting exactly this as what he calls the "hybrid" option: https://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/classroom_qa_with_larry_ferlazzo/2020/05/a_superintendents_thoughts_on_re-opening_schools_in_the_fall.html |
I can tell you are legitimately concerned about the families that are struggling based on the zero threads you started on this issue prior to the pandemic. You are just using them as a reason to get your kid back into school for your convenience which is deplorable. |
BS. You have no idea who the PP is and what she cares about. You are just using this argument to deflect from the inconvenient truth that your preferred pandemic response is hurting a lot of people you otherwise profess to care about. See how that works both ways? |
|
Here's the thing gang, we don't know for sure and we are playing with people's lives. Here's a report about Texas daycares and outbreaks.
https://www.texastribune.org/2020/07/01/texas-day-care-coronavirus-cases-rising/?utm_campaign=trib-social-buttons&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwAR2DWuY1GwMETH3GXg2d_aq0WOR3KlNAe15X9y-Le0uP3YHt65cxi77Vl2Y I think Fall 2021 is our best bet. Don't forget the people who won't want to vaccinate their kids assuming we have a vaccine. What do you do with them? |