Depends on the stage of the marriage. Most younger marriages have intimacy, few older ones do. It's not the marriage, it's the length of the relationship. No one ever said marriage was a good institution for passion or sex. |
That must be nice. I'll have heirs, but not much to leave them... |
Was that a question for me? I think we’re saying the same thing |
OTOH, what first PP wrote pretty much describes my marriage -- no one to plan with, no one who helps me out, no one who cooks dinner, minds the kids or brings me breakfast in bed or does anything special. If I want to try a restaurant, I had to ask my DH , who likely wouldn't be into it but would go and be sort of a pill. It wasn't even much of a financial benefit, since DH earned significantly less than I did but wouldn't do any of the parenting thus hobbling my income/career potential. He didn't do any of the administrative work of paying bills, nor the strategizing of financial savings. So, he was basically someone to split bills with, which was pretty much the main benefit. Marriage was just a situation where I had one more kid to take care of, one more ego to massage and one more person's work to do that they wouldn't do for themselves. Needless to say, I am divorced. I think we all dream about good relationships where the partner is really a partner that does their fair share of all kinds of work, is a good friend, but also someone with whom you have great sexual chemistry and with whom you agree or are able to peacefully and positively negotiate life goals/changes. I sometimes think many people -- married or single -- hope for that kind of partner but never get it. So, IME, many people are either single and unhappy or married and unhappy. |
If my kids ended up like this, I'd wonder if they were in a romantic relationship and wonder where I went wrong... |
This thread went in an unexpectedly kind direction. I was a little worried when the OP posted that it would be a bunch of married people trashing single people for being "broken" or having issues. I liked all the sharing from others in the unmarried camp. (48-year-old unmarried-w-kid here.) |
Interesting...why are people who never married or have kids on the relationship forum. I'm assuming that you saw the post through the recent topics? |
To add to this - why are they on DC urban MOMS and DADS at all? |
Because Jeff isn’t as close minded as you seem to think he is. |
Because they're in relationships other than marriage? |
Sounds like she never married because she is like that, not that she turned out that way because she never married. |
I never married and was able to create the exact life I wanted.
Adopting a child. Spending discretionary income on travel (not fancy cars or big houses.) Going back to school in middle age, for a doctoral degree. These plans could have been difficult or sidetracked by a non-cooperative partner. I am not saying I am better off without a partner, I am just saying, I have had a wonderful life as a single adult. (This site, in particular, often makes me feel like I dodged a bullet!) |
I got pregnant in college, dropped out, reentered a few years later then got my law degree and now I’m 39 with a 19 year old daughter. I have a great life....now....and I have no need to get married. Over the years I’ve had a series of very nice relationships so my social and sexual needs have been well taken care of. Would I ever marry? Once I’m fully an empty nester I would consider it if I really fell in love with someone. |
I recently read a NYTimes Vows story about two perpetually single people who married in their late 50s or early 60s. They were both career-focused fur mist of their lives. Based on their story it sounds like they found what suited the best at the right time. I’d take a relationship like theirs any day over poorly thought out early 20s marriage with kids that ends in disaster. Sometimes it really isn’t all simply about the ring and procreating. This older couple sounds like they could buy all the Tiffany diamonds they’d ever want without marriage. |
|