Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:We would both go so I know for a fact that's what happened.
Wow, you're not crazy controlling AT ALL.
Go read my response to another judgmental poster like yourself at 10:29.
I did read it, and I still think you're crazy controlling. If it's real, you not only have zero business being there, you'd probably be making it worse for the victim having this random chick tag along in her horribly scary and vulnerable moment. If it's not real, you'll figure that out pretty quickly before you're too involved with the guy without being there for this incident when more incidents start piling up in questionable ways.
I work DV victims daily so again, you don't know me or how I think in the most vulnerable situations for women and men.
If you think a random stranger with no connection to the situation other than having been on a date with a support person of the victim is entitled to be present in the aftermath of the assault, you have no business working with DV victims. It doesn't matter who you are or what you know, you are a random stranger and you should not be there.
I really hope you're lying about your work with DV victims, because the fact that you don't seem to understand this is deeply disturbing to someone who has also worked with DV victims.