Mothers, do you teach your daughters to marry providers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I want my girls to marry a provider. They are both college grads with good jobs. When they have children, I want them to be able to SAH at least until the kids are school age. That's what they want as well. The idea of my grand babies in a daycare center or with a nanny is just too awful to consider. My oldest son is married and is a wonderful provider. My DIL is at home with the baby.

Unless you are offering to care for their babies, you have to give up your pipe dream. They might even marry men who don't want kids!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want my girls to marry a provider. They are both college grads with good jobs. When they have children, I want them to be able to SAH at least until the kids are school age. That's what they want as well. The idea of my grand babies in a daycare center or with a nanny is just too awful to consider. My oldest son is married and is a wonderful provider. My DIL is at home with the baby.

Why can't your girls be the providers and marry men who want to stay at home? Is that also "too awful to consider"?

As soon as men start giving birth and breastfeeding that will make more sense. Until then, it's a stupid argument. Women are created to be near their young children. For all the talk of "natural" and "organic" on dcum, you would think this would be easy to grasp.

I hope this is all the same kooky woman posting this over and over again. Some women seem to be very bitter about carrying and birthing children.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If a woman wants the option to stay home with her babies for a few years, the only way that's possible is if she marries a man with a high enough income.

Marrying someone who can't provide for a family means preemptively taking this option off the table. Maybe if we lived in a civilized country this wouldn't be a big deal, but in the U.S. where maternity leave is non-existent it is a valid concern.

To pretend otherwise is to ignore the realities of life.

You should save enough money to pay for your own breeding, and the time thereafter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better question is "what are you teaching your daughters to attract and keep a husband who is a big earner and good provider?"

Men earning over $200K in the DC area are the "gold standard" in terms of husband-material. They represent the 98th percentile of the male population. If your daughter is in the middle of the bell curve in terms of looks, height, weight, etc, how on earth do you possibly think she's going to attract a suitor that is at the extreme far right end of their own repestive curve?

To attract and wed an above-average husband like that, a young woman MUST be above-average herself.

Simply being "attractive" isn't enough. Being in shape, isn't enough. Being educated, isn't enough. There are SCORES of attractive, thin, educated women in this area for every potential trophy husband.

If you want your daughter to marry a 98th percentile man, she needs to be equally impressive herself. That means stunning looks. Not just cute, not just beautiful, but stunning. Same for weight. "Average", just will not do. She needs to be model-thin, but at the same time, large breasted. Classic Barbie Doll type shape, and taller than average. Her level of fitness needs to be cross-fit instructor good, too. She should speak at least three languages ages, two fluently, and have an Ivy undergrad background. And she needs to be HIGHLY skilled sexually. She needs to be able to perform like a porn star. Nothing should be beyond her.

All these elements are what separate "average" young women from those who can land a 98th percentile husband.

Average women marry average men. Period. Above average men won't marry average women. They'll date them. They'll have sex with them. They'll amuse themselves with them. But they will NOT marry them.

If you want more for your daughter than an average husband, you need to shape her into something well above average herself.


This post will cause some anger, but there's nothing in it that isn't true.

The way you think is gross. I married one of those men and I am an average looking preschool teacher.

Yeah pp is way over exaggerating the situation. 200k guys out west aren't marrying modelesque multi lingual betches.

Microsoft, Facebook, amazon, Google wives don't look like that at all. If they are multilingual it's because they are 1st/2nd gen Americans like their husbands.

Maybe pp meant 200k earning white guys with 8 percent body fat and over 6 feet tall?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better question is "what are you teaching your daughters to attract and keep a husband who is a big earner and good provider?"

Men earning over $200K in the DC area are the "gold standard" in terms of husband-material. They represent the 98th percentile of the male population. If your daughter is in the middle of the bell curve in terms of looks, height, weight, etc, how on earth do you possibly think she's going to attract a suitor that is at the extreme far right end of their own repestive curve?

To attract and wed an above-average husband like that, a young woman MUST be above-average herself.

Simply being "attractive" isn't enough. Being in shape, isn't enough. Being educated, isn't enough. There are SCORES of attractive, thin, educated women in this area for every potential trophy husband.

If you want your daughter to marry a 98th percentile man, she needs to be equally impressive herself. That means stunning looks. Not just cute, not just beautiful, but stunning. Same for weight. "Average", just will not do. She needs to be model-thin, but at the same time, large breasted. Classic Barbie Doll type shape, and taller than average. Her level of fitness needs to be cross-fit instructor good, too. She should speak at least three languages ages, two fluently, and have an Ivy undergrad background. And she needs to be HIGHLY skilled sexually. She needs to be able to perform like a porn star. Nothing should be beyond her.

All these elements are what separate "average" young women from those who can land a 98th percentile husband.

Average women marry average men. Period. Above average men won't marry average women. They'll date them. They'll have sex with them. They'll amuse themselves with them. But they will NOT marry them.

If you want more for your daughter than an average husband, you need to shape her into something well above average herself.


This post will cause some anger, but there's nothing in it that isn't true.

The way you think is gross. I married one of those men and I am an average looking preschool teacher.

I think that the PP needs to tell himself this myth to feel better about why he's alone. I also married one of these men and this description does not match anyone in our social circle. (Also, for what it's worth, neither of us went to Ivy league schools)

You hit the nail on the head. This is typical Red Pill/"incel" BS. This dude would be quite a catch -- imagine the scintillating conversations your daughter would have if ONLY she could catch this prize!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If a woman wants the option to stay home with her babies for a few years, the only way that's possible is if she marries a man with a high enough income.

Marrying someone who can't provide for a family means preemptively taking this option off the table. Maybe if we lived in a civilized country this wouldn't be a big deal, but in the U.S. where maternity leave is non-existent it is a valid concern.

To pretend otherwise is to ignore the realities of life.

You should save enough money to pay for your own breeding, and the time thereafter.

And you should save enough money to pay for your own retirement and health care, rather than relying in other people's children to pay the taxes that pay for your social security and Medicare.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better question is "what are you teaching your daughters to attract and keep a husband who is a big earner and good provider?"

Men earning over $200K in the DC area are the "gold standard" in terms of husband-material. They represent the 98th percentile of the male population. If your daughter is in the middle of the bell curve in terms of looks, height, weight, etc, how on earth do you possibly think she's going to attract a suitor that is at the extreme far right end of their own repestive curve?

To attract and wed an above-average husband like that, a young woman MUST be above-average herself.

Simply being "attractive" isn't enough. Being in shape, isn't enough. Being educated, isn't enough. There are SCORES of attractive, thin, educated women in this area for every potential trophy husband.

If you want your daughter to marry a 98th percentile man, she needs to be equally impressive herself. That means stunning looks. Not just cute, not just beautiful, but stunning. Same for weight. "Average", just will not do. She needs to be model-thin, but at the same time, large breasted. Classic Barbie Doll type shape, and taller than average. Her level of fitness needs to be cross-fit instructor good, too. She should speak at least three languages ages, two fluently, and have an Ivy undergrad background. And she needs to be HIGHLY skilled sexually. She needs to be able to perform like a porn star. Nothing should be beyond her.

All these elements are what separate "average" young women from those who can land a 98th percentile husband.

Average women marry average men. Period. Above average men won't marry average women. They'll date them. They'll have sex with them. They'll amuse themselves with them. But they will NOT marry them.

If you want more for your daughter than an average husband, you need to shape her into something well above average herself.


This post will cause some anger, but there's nothing in it that isn't true.

The way you think is gross. I married one of those men and I am an average looking preschool teacher.

Yeah pp is way over exaggerating the situation. 200k guys out west aren't marrying modelesque multi lingual betches.

Microsoft, Facebook, amazon, Google wives don't look like that at all. If they are multilingual it's because they are 1st/2nd gen Americans like their husbands.

Maybe pp meant 200k earning white guys with 8 percent body fat and over 6 feet tall?

This is stupid. Hardly any woman I know who has married a rich man is all that!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want my girls to marry a provider. They are both college grads with good jobs. When they have children, I want them to be able to SAH at least until the kids are school age. That's what they want as well. The idea of my grand babies in a daycare center or with a nanny is just too awful to consider. My oldest son is married and is a wonderful provider. My DIL is at home with the baby.

Why can't your girls be the providers and marry men who want to stay at home? Is that also "too awful to consider"?

As soon as men start giving birth and breastfeeding that will make more sense. Until then, it's a stupid argument. Women are created to be near their young children. For all the talk of "natural" and "organic" on dcum, you would think this would be easy to grasp.

I hope this is all the same kooky woman posting this over and over again. Some women seem to be very bitter about carrying and birthing children.

Im not PP, but it was the opposite for me. I enjoyed carrying and birthing my children so much that I felt very physically tied to them. I know lots of parents who go back to work at 12 weeks (and do that for their family or personal happiness, with my respect) but for me it just felt like I needed to be with these amazing creatures who I was nursing and who I felt living inside of me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I teach my daughter that a woman has to make her own money. Providers can die, run off, become addicts, determine they are gay, etc. Then what?

Same here! I have raised my daughters (one is out of the house and on her own) to be self sufficient. There are no guarantees in men! I have known women who were left to fend for themselves (husbands died young or left) and were left scraping to get by.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better question is "what are you teaching your daughters to attract and keep a husband who is a big earner and good provider?"

Men earning over $200K in the DC area are the "gold standard" in terms of husband-material. They represent the 98th percentile of the male population. If your daughter is in the middle of the bell curve in terms of looks, height, weight, etc, how on earth do you possibly think she's going to attract a suitor that is at the extreme far right end of their own repestive curve?

To attract and wed an above-average husband like that, a young woman MUST be above-average herself.

Simply being "attractive" isn't enough. Being in shape, isn't enough. Being educated, isn't enough. There are SCORES of attractive, thin, educated women in this area for every potential trophy husband.

If you want your daughter to marry a 98th percentile man, she needs to be equally impressive herself. That means stunning looks. Not just cute, not just beautiful, but stunning. Same for weight. "Average", just will not do. She needs to be model-thin, but at the same time, large breasted. Classic Barbie Doll type shape, and taller than average. Her level of fitness needs to be cross-fit instructor good, too. She should speak at least three languages ages, two fluently, and have an Ivy undergrad background. And she needs to be HIGHLY skilled sexually. She needs to be able to perform like a porn star. Nothing should be beyond her.

All these elements are what separate "average" young women from those who can land a 98th percentile husband.

Average women marry average men. Period. Above average men won't marry average women. They'll date them. They'll have sex with them. They'll amuse themselves with them. But they will NOT marry them.

If you want more for your daughter than an average husband, you need to shape her into something well above average herself.


This post will cause some anger, but there's nothing in it that isn't true.

The way you think is gross. I married one of those men and I am an average looking preschool teacher.

And who is he cheating with?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A better question is "what are you teaching your daughters to attract and keep a husband who is a big earner and good provider?"

Men earning over $200K in the DC area are the "gold standard" in terms of husband-material. They represent the 98th percentile of the male population. If your daughter is in the middle of the bell curve in terms of looks, height, weight, etc, how on earth do you possibly think she's going to attract a suitor that is at the extreme far right end of their own repestive curve?

To attract and wed an above-average husband like that, a young woman MUST be above-average herself.

Simply being "attractive" isn't enough. Being in shape, isn't enough. Being educated, isn't enough. There are SCORES of attractive, thin, educated women in this area for every potential trophy husband.

If you want your daughter to marry a 98th percentile man, she needs to be equally impressive herself. That means stunning looks. Not just cute, not just beautiful, but stunning. Same for weight. "Average", just will not do. She needs to be model-thin, but at the same time, large breasted. Classic Barbie Doll type shape, and taller than average. Her level of fitness needs to be cross-fit instructor good, too. She should speak at least three languages ages, two fluently, and have an Ivy undergrad background. And she needs to be HIGHLY skilled sexually. She needs to be able to perform like a porn star. Nothing should be beyond her.

All these elements are what separate "average" young women from those who can land a 98th percentile husband.

Average women marry average men. Period. Above average men won't marry average women. They'll date them. They'll have sex with them. They'll amuse themselves with them. But they will NOT marry them.

If you want more for your daughter than an average husband, you need to shape her into something well above average herself.


This post will cause some anger, but there's nothing in it that isn't true.

False. I am all of these things and married a low earner.

The girls I know married to rich guys are simpletons. Blonde girl next door types without very much original thought.

Exceptionally intelligent women do NOT do well in the dating scene.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If a woman wants the option to stay home with her babies for a few years, the only way that's possible is if she marries a man with a high enough income.

Marrying someone who can't provide for a family means preemptively taking this option off the table. Maybe if we lived in a civilized country this wouldn't be a big deal, but in the U.S. where maternity leave is non-existent it is a valid concern.

To pretend otherwise is to ignore the realities of life.

You should save enough money to pay for your own breeding, and the time thereafter.

And you should save enough money to pay for your own retirement and health care, rather than relying in other people's children to pay the taxes that pay for your social security and Medicare.

That's true. Everyone should.

[Anonymous]

PP how do you have such big boobs with a model thin physique?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better question is "what are you teaching your daughters to attract and keep a husband who is a big earner and good provider?"

Men earning over $200K in the DC area are the "gold standard" in terms of husband-material. They represent the 98th percentile of the male population. If your daughter is in the middle of the bell curve in terms of looks, height, weight, etc, how on earth do you possibly think she's going to attract a suitor that is at the extreme far right end of their own repestive curve?

To attract and wed an above-average husband like that, a young woman MUST be above-average herself.

Simply being "attractive" isn't enough. Being in shape, isn't enough. Being educated, isn't enough. There are SCORES of attractive, thin, educated women in this area for every potential trophy husband.

If you want your daughter to marry a 98th percentile man, she needs to be equally impressive herself. That means stunning looks. Not just cute, not just beautiful, but stunning. Same for weight. "Average", just will not do. She needs to be model-thin, but at the same time, large breasted. Classic Barbie Doll type shape, and taller than average. Her level of fitness needs to be cross-fit instructor good, too. She should speak at least three languages ages, two fluently, and have an Ivy undergrad background. And she needs to be HIGHLY skilled sexually. She needs to be able to perform like a porn star. Nothing should be beyond her.

All these elements are what separate "average" young women from those who can land a 98th percentile husband.

Average women marry average men. Period. Above average men won't marry average women. They'll date them. They'll have sex with them. They'll amuse themselves with them. But they will NOT marry them.

If you want more for your daughter than an average husband, you need to shape her into something well above average herself.


This post will cause some anger, but there's nothing in it that isn't true.

False. I am all of these things and married a low earner.

The girls I know married to rich guys are simpletons. Blonde girl next door types without very much original thought.

Exceptionally intelligent women do NOT do well in the dating scene.

The ones who can put verbs in sentences?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A better question is "what are you teaching your daughters to attract and keep a husband who is a big earner and good provider?"

Men earning over $200K in the DC area are the "gold standard" in terms of husband-material. They represent the 98th percentile of the male population. If your daughter is in the middle of the bell curve in terms of looks, height, weight, etc, how on earth do you possibly think she's going to attract a suitor that is at the extreme far right end of their own repestive curve?

To attract and wed an above-average husband like that, a young woman MUST be above-average herself.

Simply being "attractive" isn't enough. Being in shape, isn't enough. Being educated, isn't enough. There are SCORES of attractive, thin, educated women in this area for every potential trophy husband.

If you want your daughter to marry a 98th percentile man, she needs to be equally impressive herself. That means stunning looks. Not just cute, not just beautiful, but stunning. Same for weight. "Average", just will not do. She needs to be model-thin, but at the same time, large breasted. Classic Barbie Doll type shape, and taller than average. Her level of fitness needs to be cross-fit instructor good, too. She should speak at least three languages ages, two fluently, and have an Ivy undergrad background. And she needs to be HIGHLY skilled sexually. She needs to be able to perform like a porn star. Nothing should be beyond her.

All these elements are what separate "average" young women from those who can land a 98th percentile husband.

Average women marry average men. Period. Above average men won't marry average women. They'll date them. They'll have sex with them. They'll amuse themselves with them. But they will NOT marry them.

If you want more for your daughter than an average husband, you need to shape her into something well above average herself.


This post will cause some anger, but there's nothing in it that isn't true.

False. I am all of these things and married a low earner.

The girls I know married to rich guys are simpletons. Blonde girl next door types without very much original thought.

Exceptionally intelligent women do NOT do well in the dating scene.

Not exceptionally intelligent enough to consider what marrying a low earner meant, apparently. I couldn't respect a man who didn't have enough drive and intelligence enough to provide for himself and his children.