Yorktown teacher charged with exposing himself to teens at McLean gym

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazed that there are parents on this forum already maligning these two teens by implying they concocted this story or the accusations are false or surely the teacher must be innocent because "we all are allowed to walk around nude in locker rooms as we please." Wow. Very sad for these boys and their families who aren't even in this teacher's school district. I think most parents want to hear more about what the boys saw the teacher actually doing.

Also, the PP complaining about people and the media reporting/judging this teacher based simply on his arrest and thereby ruining his career . . . give me a break, instead of taking this thread down from the top of the forum and letting it die, you keep highlighting it and perpetuating it with your awful comments that do make it appear as if you are friends with the teacher, or even the teacher himself.

How do you know the boys don't attend Yorktown?

I don't see anyone saying this teacher may not have done something improper or maligning the youths who reported him. You, on the other hand, have no respect for the concept of innocent until proven guilty, want to prejudge his guilt, and keep making posts that border on the prurient.

You are the same poster over and over? Enough of the broken record PLEASE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so wrong to release his name, photo, etc. His life is now ruined. A man cannot be naked in a gym locker room? If he is innocent, I hope he lawyers up and sues the teens, their parents, the school district, etc. Btw, this is a good reason not to go to gym. Any prepubescent kid can point at you, lie and you lose your job, life, family. This is some fucked up shit. Even with probable cause, it's only been hours and there's no way authorities had time to conduct proper investigation and determine guilt. I'd sue the police department as well if they did anything wrong. Fact is that even if the teens recant their story, this man is ruined. Search engines have a long memory and he'll always be cast as a pedo.

Not to mention that the 16 yo and 17 yo accusers were apparently showering together. Kind of hard to make a "pedo" argument -- in most places, 16 is the age of consent, anyway. It's not like he was leering at 7 yo boys.

We don't know what happened. But my "oh, bullshit" radar goes off when this has to do with a man being naked in a gym locker room. It's absolutely possible something untoward happened. It's equally possible there's a misunderstanding or the teens made a wrong/false accusation for some reason.

Link for this? If true, kind of changes the equation a bit.

You people are slime. Leave the boys out of it!!!! They were not arrested for indecent exposure. Lenihan was. Boys are witnesses.

[Anonymous]

------------ just threw up a little in my mouth when I read the poster who implied it is fine for a 38 year old to pervertly stare at naked teenagers with your own junk hanging out as long as they are 16 because that is the age when boys can legally consent. ---ho wrote this???!:

"Not to mention that the 16 yo and 17 yo accusers were apparently showering together. Kind of hard to make a "pedo" argument -- in most places, 16 is the age of consent, anyway. It's not like he was leering at 7 yo boys."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazed that there are parents on this forum already maligning these two teens by implying they concocted this story or the accusations are false or surely the teacher must be innocent because "we all are allowed to walk around nude in locker rooms as we please." Wow. Very sad for these boys and their families who aren't even in this teacher's school district. I think most parents want to hear more about what the boys saw the teacher actually doing.

Also, the PP complaining about people and the media reporting/judging this teacher based simply on his arrest and thereby ruining his career . . . give me a break, instead of taking this thread down from the top of the forum and letting it die, you keep highlighting it and perpetuating it with your awful comments that do make it appear as if you are friends with the teacher, or even the teacher himself.

How do you know the boys don't attend Yorktown?

I don't see anyone saying this teacher may not have done something improper or maligning the youths who reported him. You, on the other hand, have no respect for the concept of innocent until proven guilty, want to prejudge his guilt, and keep making posts that border on the prurient.

this turd won't FLUSH

r u thomas lenihan

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so wrong to release his name, photo, etc. His life is now ruined. A man cannot be naked in a gym locker room? If he is innocent, I hope he lawyers up and sues the teens, their parents, the school district, etc. Btw, this is a good reason not to go to gym. Any prepubescent kid can point at you, lie and you lose your job, life, family. This is some fucked up shit. Even with probable cause, it's only been hours and there's no way authorities had time to conduct proper investigation and determine guilt. I'd sue the police department as well if they did anything wrong. Fact is that even if the teens recant their story, this man is ruined. Search engines have a long memory and he'll always be cast as a pedo.

Not to mention that the 16 yo and 17 yo accusers were apparently showering together. Kind of hard to make a "pedo" argument -- in most places, 16 is the age of consent, anyway. It's not like he was leering at 7 yo boys.

We don't know what happened. But my "oh, bullshit" radar goes off when this has to do with a man being naked in a gym locker room. It's absolutely possible something untoward happened. It's equally possible there's a misunderstanding or the teens made a wrong/false accusation for some reason.

Link for this? If true, kind of changes the equation a bit.

You people are slime. Leave the boys out of it!!!! They were not arrested for indecent exposure. Lenihan was. Boys are witnesses.

*100

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No one is saying the teens identities should be released. You people are purposely misinterpreting posts.

*1

And the teens may or may not be from McLean. All that's known is that two teens reported an Arlington teacher while at a Tysons/McLean facility.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so wrong to release his name, photo, etc. His life is now ruined. A man cannot be naked in a gym locker room? If he is innocent, I hope he lawyers up and sues the teens, their parents, the school district, etc. Btw, this is a good reason not to go to gym. Any prepubescent kid can point at you, lie and you lose your job, life, family. This is some fucked up shit. Even with probable cause, it's only been hours and there's no way authorities had time to conduct proper investigation and determine guilt. I'd sue the police department as well if they did anything wrong. Fact is that even if the teens recant their story, this man is ruined. Search engines have a long memory and he'll always be cast as a pedo.

Not to mention that the 16 yo and 17 yo accusers were apparently showering together. Kind of hard to make a "pedo" argument -- in most places, 16 is the age of consent, anyway. It's not like he was leering at 7 yo boys.

We don't know what happened. But my "oh, bullshit" radar goes off when this has to do with a man being naked in a gym locker room. It's absolutely possible something untoward happened. It's equally possible there's a misunderstanding or the teens made a wrong/false accusation for some reason.

Link for this? If true, kind of changes the equation a bit.

You people are slime. Leave the boys out of it!!!! They were not arrested for indecent exposure. Lenihan was. Boys are witnesses.

*100

Their accusations may or may not hold up. If there can be a female Tawana Brawley and a Jackie, two boys may or may not be telling the truth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazed that there are parents on this forum already maligning these two teens by implying they concocted this story or the accusations are false or surely the teacher must be innocent because "we all are allowed to walk around nude in locker rooms as we please." Wow. Very sad for these boys and their families who aren't even in this teacher's school district. I think most parents want to hear more about what the boys saw the teacher actually doing.

Also, the PP complaining about people and the media reporting/judging this teacher based simply on his arrest and thereby ruining his career . . . give me a break, instead of taking this thread down from the top of the forum and letting it die, you keep highlighting it and perpetuating it with your awful comments that do make it appear as if you are friends with the teacher, or even the teacher himself.

How do you know the boys don't attend Yorktown?

I don't see anyone saying this teacher may not have done something improper or maligning the youths who reported him. You, on the other hand, have no respect for the concept of innocent until proven guilty, want to prejudge his guilt, and keep making posts that border on the prurient.

You are the same poster over and over? Enough of the broken record PLEASE.

No. I guess it bothers you that multiple posters just want to let this be decided by the courts.

[Anonymous]

Yeah, OJwas eventually acquitted and was totally treated unfairly by the media, public, and those judging him . . .

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazed that there are parents on this forum already maligning these two teens by implying they concocted this story or the accusations are false or surely the teacher must be innocent because "we all are allowed to walk around nude in locker rooms as we please." Wow. Very sad for these boys and their families who aren't even in this teacher's school district. I think most parents want to hear more about what the boys saw the teacher actually doing.

Also, the PP complaining about people and the media reporting/judging this teacher based simply on his arrest and thereby ruining his career . . . give me a break, instead of taking this thread down from the top of the forum and letting it die, you keep highlighting it and perpetuating it with your awful comments that do make it appear as if you are friends with the teacher, or even the teacher himself.

How do you know the boys don't attend Yorktown?

I don't see anyone saying this teacher may not have done something improper or maligning the youths who reported him. You, on the other hand, have no respect for the concept of innocent until proven guilty, want to prejudge his guilt, and keep making posts that border on the prurient.

You are the same poster over and over? Enough of the broken record PLEASE.

No. I guess it bothers you that multiple posters just want to let this be decided by the courts.

Pretty pathetic, Mr. Lenihan.

[Anonymous]

I feel like the locker room/sauna is a common place for some men to act out their creepy dapplings, because there aren't cameras, and they can chock it up to "it's a locker room, it's ok to be naked."

Or perhaps I've seen too many postings on Craigslist and heard too many things about "Spaworld."

All I know is, women don't ever have this problem in their locker rooms.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I feel like the locker room/sauna is a common place for some men to act out their creepy dapplings, because there aren't cameras, and they can chock it up to "it's a locker room, it's ok to be naked."

Or perhaps I've seen too many postings on Craigslist and heard too many things about "Spaworld."

All I know is, women don't ever have this problem in their locker rooms.

Women understand this. There is man on this forum why has been posting for pages trying to explain away this behavior as innocent (at best), or blame it on the two boys for all sorts of horrible reasons (at worse). Female teachers don't put themselves in these situations to begin with.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazed that there are parents on this forum already maligning these two teens by implying they concocted this story or the accusations are false or surely the teacher must be innocent because "we all are allowed to walk around nude in locker rooms as we please." Wow. Very sad for these boys and their families who aren't even in this teacher's school district. I think most parents want to hear more about what the boys saw the teacher actually doing.

Also, the PP complaining about people and the media reporting/judging this teacher based simply on his arrest and thereby ruining his career . . . give me a break, instead of taking this thread down from the top of the forum and letting it die, you keep highlighting it and perpetuating it with your awful comments that do make it appear as if you are friends with the teacher, or even the teacher himself.

How do you know the boys don't attend Yorktown?

I don't see anyone saying this teacher may not have done something improper or maligning the youths who reported him. You, on the other hand, have no respect for the concept of innocent until proven guilty, want to prejudge his guilt, and keep making posts that border on the prurient.

You are the same poster over and over? Enough of the broken record PLEASE.

No. I guess it bothers you that multiple posters just want to let this be decided by the courts.

Pretty pathetic, Mr. Lenihan.

What the???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amazed that there are parents on this forum already maligning these two teens by implying they concocted this story or the accusations are false or surely the teacher must be innocent because "we all are allowed to walk around nude in locker rooms as we please." Wow. Very sad for these boys and their families who aren't even in this teacher's school district. I think most parents want to hear more about what the boys saw the teacher actually doing.

Also, the PP complaining about people and the media reporting/judging this teacher based simply on his arrest and thereby ruining his career . . . give me a break, instead of taking this thread down from the top of the forum and letting it die, you keep highlighting it and perpetuating it with your awful comments that do make it appear as if you are friends with the teacher, or even the teacher himself.

How do you know the boys don't attend Yorktown?

I don't see anyone saying this teacher may not have done something improper or maligning the youths who reported him. You, on the other hand, have no respect for the concept of innocent until proven guilty, want to prejudge his guilt, and keep making posts that border on the prurient.

You are the same poster over and over? Enough of the broken record PLEASE.

No. I guess it bothers you that multiple posters just want to let this be decided by the courts.

Pretty pathetic, Mr. Lenihan.

What the???

LENNY!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I feel like the locker room/sauna is a common place for some men to act out their creepy dapplings, because there aren't cameras, and they can chock it up to "it's a locker room, it's ok to be naked."

Or perhaps I've seen too many postings on Craigslist and heard too many things about "Spaworld."

All I know is, women don't ever have this problem in their locker rooms.

Women understand this. There is man on this forum why has been posting for pages trying to explain away this behavior as innocent (at best), or blame it on the two boys for all sorts of horrible reasons (at worse). Female teachers don't put themselves in these situations to begin with.

The list of teachers with student sex problems is pretty long, and there are a lot of women on it.

http://www.lifestylepassion.com/15-1/40-female-school-teachers-arrested-for-sleeping-with-students/