Tom and Katie divorce

Anonymous
I just wonder what Katie knows that allowed her to gain full custody of Suri. Surely it has to be something damaging. I heard on GMA that Nicole's adoptive kids would call her Nicole after their visits with Tom. It looked to me like she was not going to settle for anything less than full custody and was willing do whatever it took to get it. I say...good for you Katie.
Anonymous
"I love mom. She's my mom. She's great," she told Australia's New Idea magazine "I see her sometimes and I speak to her." "We're a very close family. I love all of our family," Isabella added.

"They live with Tom, which was their choice," Kidman said sadly of Connor and Bella in a late 2010 interview. "I'd love them to live with us, but what can you do?"

Despite the distance between them, Kidman said she's extremely proud of how Cruise has raised Isabella and Connor in her absence. "They are healthy and sane and together and are great, great people," she recently told the Associated Press.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:


Where? Link?


http://www.google.com/search?q=nicole+kidman+bella+connor&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=67_9T5mOOoj49QTa3dWFBw&biw=1024&bih=672&sei=7b_9T7yzHomw8ATN9JjTBg

A simple Google search away. Any pics where the older child (the girl) looks older than about 7 were taken after the divorce.



Sorry PP, but those pics do not show what you proclaim. As a matter of fact, there wasn't one picture with NK and her kids post divorce. There were pics of the siblings together, and with Tom. There were pics of NK with a new family and kids, but none post TC/NK divorce. Go look at them yourself. The pic with them at the basketball game TC is sitting in one of the pics.

On a different note, that girl is fugly and the boy looks like a young TC with a gorgeous tan. I wonder if he is also short.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
r?


No, I am not a follower. I am quite an agnostic to all organized religions. I just have a wee-bit problem with people making accusations about something in which they have no direct or indirect information. Or, do you. And information from an inquirer like is not indirect information. I also have a big-problem with people who denigrate others religion, whatever that religion may be. You don't like Scientology, we get it, don't become a scientologist. You don't think it is a religion so be it. You call it a cult, well there are many people like myself that considers organized christianity, catholicism, hinduism, islam, mormonism, etc. quite cultish. But to say that even on this anonymous board is blasphemous. Why don't you substitute your organized religion of choice with the words you use and listens to how it sounds. BTW--All the religions extort money from their worshipers, they call it tithing, or church funds, building funds, love donations, etc. .


I cry BS - you drank the kook-aid! I HAVE had direct experience, and the money they extort and the complete control they exert your every move is not anything akin to a religion where one prays to a diety or dieties. Cult, cult, cult. Blasphemy? Against who? L. Ron Hubbard? Thetans? Hellooooo - Xenu calling!


Is it your method to call names when people disagree with. Your hatred for sometbphing is really telling in the way you come across on this thread. You can tell us. It's anonymous. What did they do to you. All religions are a cult. Some were just established earlier than others. When JC walked the earth they called his followers cult members. Same with Muhammad. Didnt catholiscm start off with the worshipping of the sun god. We all no what they say about the founder of Mormons, cult. When did that religion get started, sometime in the late 1800's. I dunno. I guest Scientolgy has to be around for another one hundred years before it is no longer a cult. And by then, a new religion would have sprung up. They are all cults.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Sorry PP, but those pics do not show what you proclaim. As a matter of fact, there wasn't one picture with NK and her kids post divorce. There were pics of the siblings together, and with Tom. There were pics of NK with a new family and kids, but none post TC/NK divorce. Go look at them yourself. The pic with them at the basketball game TC is sitting in one of the pics.

On a different note, that girl is fugly and the boy looks like a young TC with a gorgeous tan. I wonder if he is also short.


Egads. I guess I'll just have to post them here for you. These are pics where the girl looks older than 7 and the boy older than 5, which is about how old they were after the split.



With Nicole's current husband, so Nicole is obviously somewhere nearby:









Did you just conveniently ignore all the pics of them with their mom? There are also articles like this that show they're together but not always photographed:

http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,1206893,00.html

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
r?


No, I am not a follower. I am quite an agnostic to all organized religions. I just have a wee-bit problem with people making accusations about something in which they have no direct or indirect information. Or, do you. And information from an inquirer like is not indirect information. I also have a big-problem with people who denigrate others religion, whatever that religion may be. You don't like Scientology, we get it, don't become a scientologist. You don't think it is a religion so be it. You call it a cult, well there are many people like myself that considers organized christianity, catholicism, hinduism, islam, mormonism, etc. quite cultish. But to say that even on this anonymous board is blasphemous. Why don't you substitute your organized religion of choice with the words you use and listens to how it sounds. BTW--All the religions extort money from their worshipers, they call it tithing, or church funds, building funds, love donations, etc. .


I cry BS - you drank the kook-aid! I HAVE had direct experience, and the money they extort and the complete control they exert your every move is not anything akin to a religion where one prays to a diety or dieties. Cult, cult, cult. Blasphemy? Against who? L. Ron Hubbard? Thetans? Hellooooo - Xenu calling!


Is it your method to call names when people disagree with. Your hatred for sometbphing is really telling in the way you come across on this thread. You can tell us. It's anonymous. What did they do to you. All religions are a cult. Some were just established earlier than others. When JC walked the earth they called his followers cult members. Same with Muhammad. Didnt catholiscm start off with the worshipping of the sun god. We all no what they say about the founder of Mormons, cult. When did that religion get started, sometime in the late 1800's. I dunno. I guest Scientolgy has to be around for another one hundred years before it is no longer a cult. And by then, a new religion would have sprung up. They are all cults.


So tell us all about Xenu.
Anonymous
Anonymous
Agreed, except that I'm all over the prospect of unicorn breeding. That would be freaking awesome.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
What in the world is the hollywood reporter. Is it like Globe or Inquirer. Really, this is your source and only source, a rag fab mag.


The source quoted in the article is Marty Rathburn, a former high-ranking official in the C0$. Whether the interview is with The Hollywood Reporter, PBS, or the New York Times, he will say the same thing.

Are you a Xenu follower?


No, I am not a follower. I am quite an agnostic to all organized religions. I just have a wee-bit problem with people making accusations about something in which they have no direct or indirect information. Or, do you. And information from an inquirer like is not indirect information. I also have a big-problem with people who denigrate others religion, whatever that religion may be. You don't like Scientology, we get it, don't become a scientologist. You don't think it is a religion so be it. You call it a cult, well there are many people like myself that considers organized christianity, catholicism, hinduism, islam, mormonism, etc. quite cultish. But to say that even on this anonymous board is blasphemous. Why don't you substitute your organized religion of choice with the words you use and listens to how it sounds. BTW--All the religions extort money from their worshipers, they call it tithing, or church funds, building funds, love donations, etc. .


Myself and my brothers stopped attending the conservative Jewish synagogue that we were raised in. My parents are still quite active. No one at they synagogue has ever contacted any of us trying to pull us back in. No one there has ever labeled us as dangerous or has forbidden mutual contact between us and current members. When I encounter the Rabbi from time to time, he greets me warmly. It's a non issue, aside from silent judgements on both sides.

If this had been the Church of Scientology our parents would have been told to cease all contact with their three children. Maybe they would have pulled us back for some sec checks, locked us in a room and isolated us until we all agreed to stay. Maybe they would bring up issues we mentioned in private auditing sessions to blackmail us.

David Miscaviage, the Chairman of the Board (his own preferred title, what Rabbi/Priest would call himself this?) wife has not been seen in public for four years. Tommy Davidson who was the head of the Celebrity Center, is also basically "disappeared". Scientology is a fucked up cult. All high level defectors tell the same miserable tales. Yes, believing in anything spiritual is an absurd leap of faith, but the levels of exploitation are just different here, PP.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:


i love you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
r?


No, I am not a follower. I am quite an agnostic to all organized religions. I just have a wee-bit problem with people making accusations about something in which they have no direct or indirect information. Or, do you. And information from an inquirer like is not indirect information. I also have a big-problem with people who denigrate others religion, whatever that religion may be. You don't like Scientology, we get it, don't become a scientologist. You don't think it is a religion so be it. You call it a cult, well there are many people like myself that considers organized christianity, catholicism, hinduism, islam, mormonism, etc. quite cultish. But to say that even on this anonymous board is blasphemous. Why don't you substitute your organized religion of choice with the words you use and listens to how it sounds. BTW--All the religions extort money from their worshipers, they call it tithing, or church funds, building funds, love donations, etc. .


I cry BS - you drank the kook-aid! I HAVE had direct experience, and the money they extort and the complete control they exert your every move is not anything akin to a religion where one prays to a diety or dieties. Cult, cult, cult. Blasphemy? Against who? L. Ron Hubbard? Thetans? Hellooooo - Xenu calling!


Is it your method to call names when people disagree with. Your hatred for sometbphing is really telling in the way you come across on this thread. You can tell us. It's anonymous. What did they do to you. All religions are a cult. Some were just established earlier than others. When JC walked the earth they called his followers cult members. Same with Muhammad. Didnt catholiscm start off with the worshipping of the sun god. We all no what they say about the founder of Mormons, cult. When did that religion get started, sometime in the late 1800's. I dunno. I guest Scientolgy has to be around for another one hundred years before it is no longer a cult. And by then, a new religion would have sprung up. They are all cults.


You sound JUST like them. I bet you don't blink either. And it's not hatred - just calling you out. So go grab a couple of tin cans and tell it to your auditor, cuz I for one am not buying what you are selling.
Anonymous
So is the Xenu defender going to come back?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
r?


No, I am not a follower. I am quite an agnostic to all organized religions. I just have a wee-bit problem with people making accusations about something in which they have no direct or indirect information. Or, do you. And information from an inquirer like is not indirect information. I also have a big-problem with people who denigrate others religion, whatever that religion may be. You don't like Scientology, we get it, don't become a scientologist. You don't think it is a religion so be it. You call it a cult, well there are many people like myself that considers organized christianity, catholicism, hinduism, islam, mormonism, etc. quite cultish. But to say that even on this anonymous board is blasphemous. Why don't you substitute your organized religion of choice with the words you use and listens to how it sounds. BTW--All the religions extort money from their worshipers, they call it tithing, or church funds, building funds, love donations, etc. .


I cry BS - you drank the kook-aid! I HAVE had direct experience, and the money they extort and the complete control they exert your every move is not anything akin to a religion where one prays to a diety or dieties. Cult, cult, cult. Blasphemy? Against who? L. Ron Hubbard? Thetans? Hellooooo - Xenu calling!


Is it your method to call names when people disagree with. Your hatred for sometbphing is really telling in the way you come across on this thread. You can tell us. It's anonymous. What did they do to you. All religions are a cult. Some were just established earlier than others. When JC walked the earth they called his followers cult members. Same with Muhammad. Didnt catholiscm start off with the worshipping of the sun god. We all no what they say about the founder of Mormons, cult. When did that religion get started, sometime in the late 1800's. I dunno. I guest Scientolgy has to be around for another one hundred years before it is no longer a cult. And by then, a new religion would have sprung up. They are all cults.


NP here. You do realize that you are starting to out yourself as 'clean up crew' right? Sorry but it is a cult.
Anonymous
I think there is no question that PP is a member. No normal person talks like that. "What did they do to you?... you can tell us". ewwww. Super ick factor.
post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: