Tom and Katie divorce

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I desperately wish that Katie or Nicole Kidman would write a tell-all book about life with Tom Cruise. Will never happen though. Maybe in 30 years or so after he's dead.


I can't believe Nicole left her kids. At least Katie's taking Suri with her.


I still can't believe she left those kids either....so weird.


Sadly, they were definitely NOT old enough to decide such a thing. The oldest was like 6. My theory, which will piss of adoptee parents (I'm one) is that it was because they were not her bio children and that they were bi-racial. They treat them like fashion accessories. It's horrible. Brad Pitt will do this to all those "world kids" of his and that crazy Angelina eventually, just watch.


What?
The kids did spend time with Nicole after the divorce. There are some photos. She and Tom shared custody. After the kids were tweens/teens, they decided they wanted to be with Tom full-time. You can't force your kids to be with you.
Anonymous
Come on, SHEEPLE. There was a pre-nup. This is standard issue! This was all pre-arranged. No one walks away from a multi-million fortune like this. She got a pre-arranged amount of money for staying in the marriage for a certain amount of time. The end. As to the custody of Suri--nobody here could know that. That sort of thing is not coverable in a pre-nup. It remains to be seen what the details could be on that because it will likely be sealed by pre-arrangement and possibly by decree. Lawyer here.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I desperately wish that Katie or Nicole Kidman would write a tell-all book about life with Tom Cruise. Will never happen though. Maybe in 30 years or so after he's dead.


I can't believe Nicole left her kids. At least Katie's taking Suri with her.


I still can't believe she left those kids either....so weird.


Sadly, they were definitely NOT old enough to decide such a thing. The oldest was like 6. My theory, which will piss of adoptee parents (I'm one) is that it was because they were not her bio children and that they were bi-racial. They treat them like fashion accessories. It's horrible. Brad Pitt will do this to all those "world kids" of his and that crazy Angelina eventually, just watch.


What?
The kids did spend time with Nicole after the divorce. There are some photos. She and Tom shared custody. After the kids were tweens/teens, they decided they wanted to be with Tom full-time. You can't force your kids to be with you.


hahahahaha. Spoken like a person who has never been around CoS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I desperately wish that Katie or Nicole Kidman would write a tell-all book about life with Tom Cruise. Will never happen though. Maybe in 30 years or so after he's dead.


I can't believe Nicole left her kids. At least Katie's taking Suri with her.


I still can't believe she left those kids either....so weird.


Sadly, they were definitely NOT old enough to decide such a thing. The oldest was like 6. My theory, which will piss of adoptee parents (I'm one) is that it was because they were not her bio children and that they were bi-racial. They treat them like fashion accessories. It's horrible. Brad Pitt will do this to all those "world kids" of his and that crazy Angelina eventually, just watch.


What?
The kids did spend time with Nicole after the divorce. There are some photos. She and Tom shared custody. After the kids were tweens/teens, they decided they wanted to be with Tom full-time. You can't force your kids to be with you.


Where? Link?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I desperately wish that Katie or Nicole Kidman would write a tell-all book about life with Tom Cruise. Will never happen though. Maybe in 30 years or so after he's dead.


I can't believe Nicole left her kids. At least Katie's taking Suri with her.


I still can't believe she left those kids either....so weird.


Sadly, they were definitely NOT old enough to decide such a thing. The oldest was like 6. My theory, which will piss of adoptee parents (I'm one) is that it was because they were not her bio children and that they were bi-racial. They treat them like fashion accessories. It's horrible. Brad Pitt will do this to all those "world kids" of his and that crazy Angelina eventually, just watch.


What?
The kids did spend time with Nicole after the divorce. There are some photos. She and Tom shared custody. After the kids were tweens/teens, they decided they wanted to be with Tom full-time. You can't force your kids to be with you.


hahahahaha. Spoken like a person who has never been around CoS.


Huh? You're right, luckily I've never been around Co$. But Tom and Katie did share custody, then the kids were told awful, false things about her (that she's a sociopath and a suppressive person) so they severely limited contact with her.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
What in the world is the hollywood reporter. Is it like Globe or Inquirer. Really, this is your source and only source, a rag fab mag.


The source quoted in the article is Marty Rathburn, a former high-ranking official in the C0$. Whether the interview is with The Hollywood Reporter, PBS, or the New York Times, he will say the same thing.

Are you a Xenu follower?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:2307: do you think they will get you or something, for posting criticism?


I'm the pp. I'm not paranoid about anything in specific, I just know they're batshit crazy. They stalk ex-members (http://gawker.com/5794223/meet-the-bizarre-scientology-stalking-squad), they stalk people they want to join who don't want to join, they're interested in censoring web comments: http://gawker.com/5924273/scientologist-leader-urges-censorship-of-media-stand-up-and-defend-our-religion

Sooo I try to avoid posting about them. It's just so bizarre.


Alas, I guess I was not worthy of stalking. I stopped in the office at the one on Dupont Circle about ten years ago. I filled out some papers and they wanted to do some type of assessment. I admit, I was somewhat in a minor depression during this time of my life. Once they started talking about assessment, my girlfriend pulled me out of there. I never heard from them again.


LOL. You are sooooo lucky. This is very unusual. So, you were so far down in the gutter that even CoS didn't stalk you? That's pretty bad!


Thanks witch. You are a gem. I never said I was in the gutter. But if you think depression is equivalent, I can't say enough good things about you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I desperately wish that Katie or Nicole Kidman would write a tell-all book about life with Tom Cruise. Will never happen though. Maybe in 30 years or so after he's dead.


I can't believe Nicole left her kids. At least Katie's taking Suri with her.


I still can't believe she left those kids either....so weird.

I saw Kidman interview on this topic. She said the kids were old enough to make the decision (tweens or young teens maybe?) and that the LA lure was just too strong versus her life in Tennessee or wherever. So she let them decide and they chose to live with Tom.


That's weird, when Tom and Katie were on Oprah their beautiful home was shown. They lived in the mountains of Colorado or something, but it was definitely not LA or California for that matter.


According to the People Magazine I read on the checkout line the other day, they have three homes: mansion in Sothern California ($30M), mansion/ranch in Telluride, CO ($30M), and huge apt in NYC.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I desperately wish that Katie or Nicole Kidman would write a tell-all book about life with Tom Cruise. Will never happen though. Maybe in 30 years or so after he's dead.


I can't believe Nicole left her kids. At least Katie's taking Suri with her.


I still can't believe she left those kids either....so weird.


Sadly, they were definitely NOT old enough to decide such a thing. The oldest was like 6. My theory, which will piss of adoptee parents (I'm one) is that it was because they were not her bio children and that they were bi-racial. They treat them like fashion accessories. It's horrible. Brad Pitt will do this to all those "world kids" of his and that crazy Angelina eventually, just watch.


What?
The kids did spend time with Nicole after the divorce. There are some photos. She and Tom shared custody. After the kids were tweens/teens, they decided they wanted to be with Tom full-time. You can't force your kids to be with you.


Where? Link?


http://www.google.com/search?q=nicole+kidman+bella+connor&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&client=safari&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=67_9T5mOOoj49QTa3dWFBw&biw=1024&bih=672&sei=7b_9T7yzHomw8ATN9JjTBg

A simple Google search away. Any pics where the older child (the girl) looks older than about 7 were taken after the divorce.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:2307: do you think they will get you or something, for posting criticism?


I'm the pp. I'm not paranoid about anything in specific, I just know they're batshit crazy. They stalk ex-members (http://gawker.com/5794223/meet-the-bizarre-scientology-stalking-squad), they stalk people they want to join who don't want to join, they're interested in censoring web comments: http://gawker.com/5924273/scientologist-leader-urges-censorship-of-media-stand-up-and-defend-our-religion

Sooo I try to avoid posting about them. It's just so bizarre.


Alas, I guess I was not worthy of stalking. I stopped in the office at the one on Dupont Circle about ten years ago. I filled out some papers and they wanted to do some type of assessment. I admit, I was somewhat in a minor depression during this time of my life. Once they started talking about assessment, my girlfriend pulled me out of there. I never heard from them again.


LOL. You are sooooo lucky. This is very unusual. So, you were so far down in the gutter that even CoS didn't stalk you? That's pretty bad!


Thanks witch. You are a gem. I never said I was in the gutter. But if you think depression is equivalent, I can't say enough good things about you.


I used to work for some members of CO$ - it's a cult full of wackadoodles no question, and it's all about the money. My guess is that you didn't have enough $$ to make it worth their while to chase you. They tried with me for a bit, but gave up. This was years ago, when members were much more closeted. So to speak.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
What in the world is the hollywood reporter. Is it like Globe or Inquirer. Really, this is your source and only source, a rag fab mag.


The source quoted in the article is Marty Rathburn, a former high-ranking official in the C0$. Whether the interview is with The Hollywood Reporter, PBS, or the New York Times, he will say the same thing.

Are you a Xenu follower?


No, I am not a follower. I am quite an agnostic to all organized religions. I just have a wee-bit problem with people making accusations about something in which they have no direct or indirect information. Or, do you. And information from an inquirer like is not indirect information. I also have a big-problem with people who denigrate others religion, whatever that religion may be. You don't like Scientology, we get it, don't become a scientologist. You don't think it is a religion so be it. You call it a cult, well there are many people like myself that considers organized christianity, catholicism, hinduism, islam, mormonism, etc. quite cultish. But to say that even on this anonymous board is blasphemous. Why don't you substitute your organized religion of choice with the words you use and listens to how it sounds. BTW--All the religions extort money from their worshipers, they call it tithing, or church funds, building funds, love donations, etc. .
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I desperately wish that Katie or Nicole Kidman would write a tell-all book about life with Tom Cruise. Will never happen though. Maybe in 30 years or so after he's dead.


I can't believe Nicole left her kids. At least Katie's taking Suri with her.


I still can't believe she left those kids either....so weird.

I saw Kidman interview on this topic. She said the kids were old enough to make the decision (tweens or young teens maybe?) and that the LA lure was just too strong versus her life in Tennessee or wherever. So she let them decide and they chose to live with Tom.


That's weird, when Tom and Katie were on Oprah their beautiful home was shown. They lived in the mountains of Colorado or something, but it was definitely not LA or California for that matter.


According to the People Magazine I read on the checkout line the other day, they have three homes: mansion in Sothern California ($30M), mansion/ranch in Telluride, CO ($30M), and huge apt in NYC.


I am the poster you quoted. On O they said the family spent most of their time in CO. If I was Katie, I would take the apartment in NYC given the choice.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
What in the world is the hollywood reporter. Is it like Globe or Inquirer. Really, this is your source and only source, a rag fab mag.


The source quoted in the article is Marty Rathburn, a former high-ranking official in the C0$. Whether the interview is with The Hollywood Reporter, PBS, or the New York Times, he will say the same thing.

Are you a Xenu follower?


No, I am not a follower. I am quite an agnostic to all organized religions. I just have a wee-bit problem with people making accusations about something in which they have no direct or indirect information. Or, do you. And information from an inquirer like is not indirect information. I also have a big-problem with people who denigrate others religion, whatever that religion may be. You don't like Scientology, we get it, don't become a scientologist. You don't think it is a religion so be it. You call it a cult, well there are many people like myself that considers organized christianity, catholicism, hinduism, islam, mormonism, etc. quite cultish. But to say that even on this anonymous board is blasphemous. Why don't you substitute your organized religion of choice with the words you use and listens to how it sounds. BTW--All the religions extort money from their worshipers, they call it tithing, or church funds, building funds, love donations, etc. .


I cry BS - you drank the kook-aid! I HAVE had direct experience, and the money they extort and the complete control they exert your every move is not anything akin to a religion where one prays to a diety or dieties. Cult, cult, cult. Blasphemy? Against who? L. Ron Hubbard? Thetans? Hellooooo - Xenu calling!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I desperately wish that Katie or Nicole Kidman would write a tell-all book about life with Tom Cruise. Will never happen though. Maybe in 30 years or so after he's dead.


I can't believe Nicole left her kids. At least Katie's taking Suri with her.


I still can't believe she left those kids either....so weird.


Sadly, they were definitely NOT old enough to decide such a thing. The oldest was like 6. My theory, which will piss of adoptee parents (I'm one) is that it was because they were not her bio children and that they were bi-racial. They treat them like fashion accessories. It's horrible. Brad Pitt will do this to all those "world kids" of his and that crazy Angelina eventually, just watch.


What?
The kids did spend time with Nicole after the divorce. There are some photos. She and Tom shared custody. After the kids were tweens/teens, they decided they wanted to be with Tom full-time. You can't force your kids to be with you.


Where? Link?


here: http://www.fanpop.com/spots/nicole-kidman-and-naomi-watts-aussie-bffs/images/14868443/title/nicole-lakers-game-with-connor-isabella-photo

here: http://www.popcornnation.com/news/tom-lets-nicole-have-the-kids-for-an-afternoon/

here: http://www.celebrific.com/topics/celebrities/nicole-kidman/

here: http://www.justjared.com/2006/08/08/nicole-kidman-daughter-isabella/

I'm sure you could find more if you googled
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
What in the world is the hollywood reporter. Is it like Globe or Inquirer. Really, this is your source and only source, a rag fab mag.


The source quoted in the article is Marty Rathburn, a former high-ranking official in the C0$. Whether the interview is with The Hollywood Reporter, PBS, or the New York Times, he will say the same thing.

Are you a Xenu follower?


No, I am not a follower. I am quite an agnostic to all organized religions. I just have a wee-bit problem with people making accusations about something in which they have no direct or indirect information. Or, do you. And information from an inquirer like is not indirect information. I also have a big-problem with people who denigrate others religion, whatever that religion may be. You don't like Scientology, we get it, don't become a scientologist. You don't think it is a religion so be it. You call it a cult, well there are many people like myself that considers organized christianity, catholicism, hinduism, islam, mormonism, etc. quite cultish. But to say that even on this anonymous board is blasphemous. Why don't you substitute your organized religion of choice with the words you use and listens to how it sounds. BTW--All the religions extort money from their worshipers, they call it tithing, or church funds, building funds, love donations, etc. .


First, the source isn't the National Enquirer or an article like it. Also, you keep ignoring WHO they are quoting in favor of continuing to dismiss it as "Inquirer"-like. This guy has more direct knowledge than you or I do, but since it doesn't fit with what you think, you keep ignoring it.

Also, I am not religious in any way, and so while I can find fault to some degree with all organized religions, Hinduism and Christinsity are quite different from $cient0l0gy, which I feel is a cult. Chile, France, and Israel agree with me. Many other nations refuse to classify it as a religion.
post reply Forum Index » Off-Topic
Message Quick Reply
Go to: