At least a generation. There are people still alive who have been turned down for membership at CCC because of their Jewish background. |
Do you ask the same question of the hundreds of people you see driving Mercedes or other expensive cars, those who live in really expensive houses, those who have second homes, private school parents, yacht owners...... I could go on and on. Where do you draw the line? Is a 800,000 house ok but not a three million? If you have one child is 10,000 sq feet wrong, but it's ok if you have 6 kids? I share your concerns for excessive consumption when there are people who don't have enough to eat, but these are very personal, individual decisions. We belong to a club, but we paid less because we are legacy and we really don't spend much money on other forms of entertainment, vacation, travel,etc. We enjoy all the activities the club offers and the friends we have there. |
I agree and think that kind of discrimination is terrible, but the PP said "in the last few decades." If so, that would be at least a generation. Maybe that was incorrect info? |
Of course I know that there are fabulously wealthy people, and that charity is a personal decision. I just never realized there could be such a thing as a club with a pool and tennis courts that could cost that much to join. We are a military family, and we have our officers club and pool, and I know it is all government subsidized. I know this area is very expensive. And I guess for some people a certain club offers a lot of advantages. Again, what stood out to me was the idea that Christians would be comfortable with those kinds of fees. It seems like your kids could go swimming for a lot less. I never realized what country clubs were really like. |
To be blunt, it's not really all that different (except for the cost because, as you said, the officers' club/pool is government subsidized) from the concept of having a pool for the enlisted men and one for the families of military officers. When we swim in a separate pool, are we meeting the Christian ideal? I'm guessing not. |
I'm lost. I don't see the parallel at all. Enlisted and officers are separated to maintain good order and discipline and to prevent fraternization. It is not a statement on intrinsic value in the eyes of God, about comparative wealth, or even about amenities (they are the same). Military live the Christian ideal of laying down their lives for their neighbors. But their individual virtues are certainly not assured. We're all human. I just don't see your point. |
Just FYI, we have several Naval Academy and Air Force Academy grads in our family. I understand about laying down lives for neighbors. It's stilll the concept of separating the "upper" from the "lowers." Even you said, "to prevent fraternization." I'm just pointing out that I doubt Jesus would have thought such separation necessary . . . |
This. It's hard to even fathom anyone spending that kind of money so frivolously when some of us don't even have a house to live in. |
|
|
Did Jesus belong to the CCC? |
|
WWJD?
Certainly NOT belong to a country club. |
It is their money and they can spend it how they wish. A few people have $50,000 watches, you can tell time just as well on a $1,000 watch, but it's their money and they can spend $100,000 on a watch, country club membership, whatever. Some people don't have a car and some people drive cars that cost more than $75,000. Again, it is their money. There is not obligation, moral or legal, for the very rich to buy a house or car for anyone else. There is a moral obligation to give to charity but no legal obligation. Frankly, I enjoy seeing the very rich enjoying themselves as it gives me a better perspective on my own life. I can't have their life style but I like my life and I am happy. |
WTH, my sister always exaggerates about money! Well I am sorry for the misinformation but she seriously has this complex where she wants to outspend everyone in the family. |