| ^dcum not scum, obviously! |
Seriously. OP said it was 2 of the 3 of the options of “mental health struggles, drug addiction, or abuse”. I mean… any 2 of those 3, to me, is going to absolutely limit custody. I would hope. And OP has no obligation to push her son to spend more time than anyone (son, OP, or dad) wants with an abusive and/ or drug addicted and/ or mentally ill father. Not until he cleans up his act. |
You are legitimately ridiculous and grasping at straws. Former altar server here. It is NOVEMBER. There is no law requiring him not to switch services. Christmas Eve is an especially easy service to get covered by another server because almost all of them ARE ALREADY THERE. Please stop. Find acceptance. If you can’t, get a therapist. If you have a therapist, get a new one. |
Hey, I don’t think this thread is for you. Things were pretty much figured out and Op got some good advice and we have a good understanding of why the situation is the way it is. Your all-caps anger should maybe go over to a more benign thread and not be used to dump on a mom dealing with what seems like a spouse with addiction/abuse/mental health problems. -ALSO a former altar server, so there! |
We don’t know if there is abuse and parents still have their rights. Thanksgiving is not a religious holiday. Same with new years. |
A mentally ill person or addict doesn’t have “rights” until a court decides they are competent to care for a child. Get off with your nonsense. |
What, exactly, is a 'both parents drum'? Explain? FYI, many people with mental illness are parenting. In OP's case, she is alleging things and I guess the custody evaluation will be the deciding factor. But no, you don't just lose parenting rights because of mental illness. It is in the best interest of children to have access to both parents. |
| OP, just wanted to check in with you and see how the first Christmas/ new years ended up going. I hope it was okay. |
The modern idea of “best interests of children to have access to both parents” circa the early 2000s is grounded in studies of children of divorce with two mentally stable and equally capable parents, which was distorted and leveraged by fathers’ rights groups who lobbied family courts in the 2000s to push the “both parents” agenda. People and even judges have inaccurately extrapolated backwards from this legal concept the idea that all parents are equal and therefore children benefit from any parent in their life. That couldn’t be farther from the truth as many of us know, but unwinding it legally will probably take decades. |
Hi! It was really peaceful in a way I couldn’t have anticipated. We had the best time and there was no walking on eggshells or guilt trips or dark moods clouding happy days. STBX kept his distance, and that part was terrifying because it always means there’s punishment coming. January 5th brought a week of motions and letters from his attorney. I’ll get through it. I can’t control his behavior or how he uses the legal system so I’m focused on every day with my kids being as nice as it can be while it can. |
Good for you, OP! Even if you do end up sharing Christmas in the future - which is of course a distinct possibility, barring your ex's agreement that he doesn't want Christmas, or the court not granting him any physical custody- I am glad you guys had a peaceful one this year. |
He kept his distance as you didn't want to let him have time with the kids and make things so difficult. You are punishing him. |
More like he flew away on a guys’ ski trip with a bunch of his single and child-free friends at the last minute without warning and missed the days he was going to do “his” Christmas with the kids because it was a “once in a lifetime chance to ski in [place that he’s been before]”, but good try. |
Why shouldn’t he go if you have full custody and will not let him hs r tine with the kids. Your posts are that he cannot see the kids so what do you want from him? |
Here. Dad gets every other weekend and that’s it. You are saying no holidays so you vs. it get mad he traveled. |