US Super Regions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

And then once you have that you’ll seek ways to divide yourselves further.
It will never end.

Abraham Lincoln knew this.

This is what our adversaries want.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

And then once you have that you’ll seek ways to divide yourselves further.
It will never end.

Abraham Lincoln knew this.

This is what our adversaries want.

Chill out a little bit . They're trying to make vaccines available, not fight a war over slavery.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

And then once you have that you’ll seek ways to divide yourselves further.
It will never end.

Abraham Lincoln knew this.

This is what our adversaries want.

[phone]

And if the crazies do seek a split, I'm going with the smart people who have stepped out of the red and blue cult bubbles and no longer associate with the loonies. Those hyper-partisan nut jobs can't see the forest for the trees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

And then once you have that you’ll seek ways to divide yourselves further.
It will never end.

Abraham Lincoln knew this.

This is what our adversaries want.

[phone]

And if the crazies do seek a split, I'm going with the smart people who have stepped out of the red and blue cult bubbles and no longer associate with the loonies. Those hyper-partisan nut jobs can't see the forest for the trees.

People are not interested in fighting someone that wants to go get a vaccine. People are busy. Not everyone is sitting around salivating about the civil war

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

And then once you have that you’ll seek ways to divide yourselves further.
It will never end.

Abraham Lincoln knew this.

This is what our adversaries want.

[phone]

And if the crazies do seek a split, I'm going with the smart people who have stepped out of the red and blue cult bubbles and no longer associate with the loonies. Those hyper-partisan nut jobs can't see the forest for the trees.

It’s not a both side issue but the good thing is you can stay in you RWNJ bubble and everyone else can live without fear of you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

And then once you have that you’ll seek ways to divide yourselves further.
It will never end.

Abraham Lincoln knew this.

This is what our adversaries want.

[phone]

And if the crazies do seek a split, I'm going with the smart people who have stepped out of the red and blue cult bubbles and no longer associate with the loonies. Those hyper-partisan nut jobs can't see the forest for the trees.

It’s not a both side issue but the good thing is you can stay in you RWNJ bubble and everyone else can live without fear of you.

There are two sides of the political spectrum. On one side you have the American people struggling to retain a small fraction of control over their Federal Government. On the other side you have the wealthy and powerful mega-donors who control 99% of our Federal level politicians. Which side are you on? Are you one of the 75 IQ duped fools who think their neighbors are their enemy or are you smart enough to realize who your true political enemy is?

Think. Read. Do better. Be better. Time for all of us to see the big picture for what it is and realize our fellow American citizens are not our enemies!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

It’s not red vs blue states, it’s cities vs rural areas. How would you divide it up?

That’s a problem. Look at Texas and Missouri. Four blue cities in Texas is the economic engine for the state, but the state is politically controlled by the rural red areas surrounding them. St. Louis and Kansas City is blue or light blue in Missouri, and those cities are the crown jewels for the state’s economics. However, the rural red areas are set to gerrymander the hel-ll out of those two cities, divide them into pieces and create red republican voting districts that extent up to 100 miles outside the respective city limits.

Unpopular opinion, but if you are blue in a red state, move. Let's the red states drown themselves.

That makes no sense. The red states are sending troops to oppress the blue states and passing laws to punish blue states while taking our money.

There is no hope for this country to stay together. You break it up by red and blue states. This keeps the state government functioning through the transition at least in the blue states. Also this would give a connectivity by red and blue states. Who knows what the red states will do. I do not see them all joining with Texas or Florida. Texas will definitely go it alone and Florida will not join Texas.

After that is done people can migrate where they want with approval of the state. Red states will not allow many unless they meet racial purity test.

The issue is how do you connect Colorado and New Mexico. Would have to work something out with either Mexico or Arizona. Mexico would most likely be more reasonable vs any red state. Pennsylvania would definitely be red state. A few tricky areas but nothing really that hard to figure out. State governors are pretty practical.

Though who cares as long as we are away from the red sates. Think of all the nice things we could have in the blue states. You could finally get a high speed train on both coast, an air traffic control that works, gun control, vaccines, national healthcare, none partisan FBI, no more Federalist Society, supreme Court reform, no more money wasted in the red states, etc

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

It’s not red vs blue states, it’s cities vs rural areas. How would you divide it up?

That’s a problem. Look at Texas and Missouri. Four blue cities in Texas is the economic engine for the state, but the state is politically controlled by the rural red areas surrounding them. St. Louis and Kansas City is blue or light blue in Missouri, and those cities are the crown jewels for the state’s economics. However, the rural red areas are set to gerrymander the hel-ll out of those two cities, divide them into pieces and create red republican voting districts that extent up to 100 miles outside the respective city limits.

Unpopular opinion, but if you are blue in a red state, move. Let's the red states drown themselves.

That makes no sense. The red states are sending troops to oppress the blue states and passing laws to punish blue states while taking our money.

There is no hope for this country to stay together. You break it up by red and blue states. This keeps the state government functioning through the transition at least in the blue states. Also this would give a connectivity by red and blue states. Who knows what the red states will do. I do not see them all joining with Texas or Florida. Texas will definitely go it alone and Florida will not join Texas.

After that is done people can migrate where they want with approval of the state. Red states will not allow many unless they meet racial purity test.

The issue is how do you connect Colorado and New Mexico. Would have to work something out with either Mexico or Arizona. Mexico would most likely be more reasonable vs any red state. Pennsylvania would definitely be red state. A few tricky areas but nothing really that hard to figure out. State governors are pretty practical.

Though who cares as long as we are away from the red sates. Think of all the nice things we could have in the blue states. You could finally get a high speed train on both coast, an air traffic control that works, gun control, vaccines, national healthcare, none partisan FBI, no more Federalist Society, supreme Court reform, no more money wasted in the red states, etc

There are no such things as red states and blue states. It's 2025, not 1850 you twit. Take your racist MAGA crap and shove it up your rear end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

And then once you have that you’ll seek ways to divide yourselves further.
It will never end.

Abraham Lincoln knew this.

This is what our adversaries want.

[phone]

And if the crazies do seek a split, I'm going with the smart people who have stepped out of the red and blue cult bubbles and no longer associate with the loonies. Those hyper-partisan nut jobs can't see the forest for the trees.

It’s not a both side issue but the good thing is you can stay in you RWNJ bubble and everyone else can live without fear of you.

There are two sides of the political spectrum. On one side you have the American people struggling to retain a small fraction of control over their Federal Government. On the other side you have the wealthy and powerful mega-donors who control 99% of our Federal level politicians. Which side are you on? Are you one of the 75 IQ duped fools who think their neighbors are their enemy or are you smart enough to realize who your true political enemy is?

Think. Read. Do better. Be better. Time for all of us to see the big picture for what it is and realize our fellow American citizens are not our enemies!!

You better listen to what the republicans are saying. They hate blue states, democrats, progressives, brown, black, Jew, Catholic, urbanite, etc. They want to kill them. Preacher class warfare someplace else or save it for after the break up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

It’s not red vs blue states, it’s cities vs rural areas. How would you divide it up?

That’s a problem. Look at Texas and Missouri. Four blue cities in Texas is the economic engine for the state, but the state is politically controlled by the rural red areas surrounding them. St. Louis and Kansas City is blue or light blue in Missouri, and those cities are the crown jewels for the state’s economics. However, the rural red areas are set to gerrymander the hel-ll out of those two cities, divide them into pieces and create red republican voting districts that extent up to 100 miles outside the respective city limits.

Unpopular opinion, but if you are blue in a red state, move. Let's the red states drown themselves.

That makes no sense. The red states are sending troops to oppress the blue states and passing laws to punish blue states while taking our money.

There is no hope for this country to stay together. You break it up by red and blue states. This keeps the state government functioning through the transition at least in the blue states. Also this would give a connectivity by red and blue states. Who knows what the red states will do. I do not see them all joining with Texas or Florida. Texas will definitely go it alone and Florida will not join Texas.

After that is done people can migrate where they want with approval of the state. Red states will not allow many unless they meet racial purity test.

The issue is how do you connect Colorado and New Mexico. Would have to work something out with either Mexico or Arizona. Mexico would most likely be more reasonable vs any red state. Pennsylvania would definitely be red state. A few tricky areas but nothing really that hard to figure out. State governors are pretty practical.

Though who cares as long as we are away from the red sates. Think of all the nice things we could have in the blue states. You could finally get a high speed train on both coast, an air traffic control that works, gun control, vaccines, national healthcare, none partisan FBI, no more Federalist Society, supreme Court reform, no more money wasted in the red states, etc

There are no such things as red states and blue states. It's 2025, not 1850 you twit. Take your racist MAGA crap and shove it up your rear end.

We are just trying to shed the welfare states. I thought that MAGAs didn’t like liberals. Go be maga by yourself, we are kind of over you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

It’s not red vs blue states, it’s cities vs rural areas. How would you divide it up?

That’s a problem. Look at Texas and Missouri. Four blue cities in Texas is the economic engine for the state, but the state is politically controlled by the rural red areas surrounding them. St. Louis and Kansas City is blue or light blue in Missouri, and those cities are the crown jewels for the state’s economics. However, the rural red areas are set to gerrymander the hel-ll out of those two cities, divide them into pieces and create red republican voting districts that extent up to 100 miles outside the respective city limits.

Unpopular opinion, but if you are blue in a red state, move. Let's the red states drown themselves.

That makes no sense. The red states are sending troops to oppress the blue states and passing laws to punish blue states while taking our money.

There is no hope for this country to stay together. You break it up by red and blue states. This keeps the state government functioning through the transition at least in the blue states. Also this would give a connectivity by red and blue states. Who knows what the red states will do. I do not see them all joining with Texas or Florida. Texas will definitely go it alone and Florida will not join Texas.

After that is done people can migrate where they want with approval of the state. Red states will not allow many unless they meet racial purity test.

The issue is how do you connect Colorado and New Mexico. Would have to work something out with either Mexico or Arizona. Mexico would most likely be more reasonable vs any red state. Pennsylvania would definitely be red state. A few tricky areas but nothing really that hard to figure out. State governors are pretty practical.

Though who cares as long as we are away from the red sates. Think of all the nice things we could have in the blue states. You could finally get a high speed train on both coast, an air traffic control that works, gun control, vaccines, national healthcare, none partisan FBI, no more Federalist Society, supreme Court reform, no more money wasted in the red states, etc

Just think what this would do to the Big10 athletic conference.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

It’s not red vs blue states, it’s cities vs rural areas. How would you divide it up?

That’s a problem. Look at Texas and Missouri. Four blue cities in Texas is the economic engine for the state, but the state is politically controlled by the rural red areas surrounding them. St. Louis and Kansas City is blue or light blue in Missouri, and those cities are the crown jewels for the state’s economics. However, the rural red areas are set to gerrymander the hel-ll out of those two cities, divide them into pieces and create red republican voting districts that extent up to 100 miles outside the respective city limits.

Unpopular opinion, but if you are blue in a red state, move. Let's the red states drown themselves.

That makes no sense. The red states are sending troops to oppress the blue states and passing laws to punish blue states while taking our money.

There is no hope for this country to stay together. You break it up by red and blue states. This keeps the state government functioning through the transition at least in the blue states. Also this would give a connectivity by red and blue states. Who knows what the red states will do. I do not see them all joining with Texas or Florida. Texas will definitely go it alone and Florida will not join Texas.

After that is done people can migrate where they want with approval of the state. Red states will not allow many unless they meet racial purity test.

The issue is how do you connect Colorado and New Mexico. Would have to work something out with either Mexico or Arizona. Mexico would most likely be more reasonable vs any red state. Pennsylvania would definitely be red state. A few tricky areas but nothing really that hard to figure out. State governors are pretty practical.

Though who cares as long as we are away from the red sates. Think of all the nice things we could have in the blue states. You could finally get a high speed train on both coast, an air traffic control that works, gun control, vaccines, national healthcare, none partisan FBI, no more Federalist Society, supreme Court reform, no more money wasted in the red states, etc

There are no such things as red states and blue states. It's 2025, not 1850 you twit. Take your racist MAGA crap and shove it up your rear end.

We are just trying to shed the welfare states. I thought that MAGAs didn’t like liberals. Go be maga by yourself, we are kind of over you.

You're advocating for severing ties with the states containing the highest African American populations because, according to you low IQ pea-brains, they're too "welfare" dependent. Crawl back under your rocks with your idiot MAGA friends.

DP, I think the PP was referring to Red "taker states" what are on welfare from blue states that pay more into the system than they receive. A tyranny of the minority is not sustainable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

It’s not red vs blue states, it’s cities vs rural areas. How would you divide it up?

That’s a problem. Look at Texas and Missouri. Four blue cities in Texas is the economic engine for the state, but the state is politically controlled by the rural red areas surrounding them. St. Louis and Kansas City is blue or light blue in Missouri, and those cities are the crown jewels for the state’s economics. However, the rural red areas are set to gerrymander the hel-ll out of those two cities, divide them into pieces and create red republican voting districts that extent up to 100 miles outside the respective city limits.

Unpopular opinion, but if you are blue in a red state, move. Let's the red states drown themselves.

That makes no sense. The red states are sending troops to oppress the blue states and passing laws to punish blue states while taking our money.

There is no hope for this country to stay together. You break it up by red and blue states. This keeps the state government functioning through the transition at least in the blue states. Also this would give a connectivity by red and blue states. Who knows what the red states will do. I do not see them all joining with Texas or Florida. Texas will definitely go it alone and Florida will not join Texas.

After that is done people can migrate where they want with approval of the state. Red states will not allow many unless they meet racial purity test.

The issue is how do you connect Colorado and New Mexico. Would have to work something out with either Mexico or Arizona. Mexico would most likely be more reasonable vs any red state. Pennsylvania would definitely be red state. A few tricky areas but nothing really that hard to figure out. State governors are pretty practical.

Though who cares as long as we are away from the red sates. Think of all the nice things we could have in the blue states. You could finally get a high speed train on both coast, an air traffic control that works, gun control, vaccines, national healthcare, none partisan FBI, no more Federalist Society, supreme Court reform, no more money wasted in the red states, etc

There are no such things as red states and blue states. It's 2025, not 1850 you twit. Take your racist MAGA crap and shove it up your rear end.

We are just trying to shed the welfare states. I thought that MAGAs didn’t like liberals. Go be maga by yourself, we are kind of over you.

You're advocating for severing ties with the states containing the highest African American populations because, according to you low IQ pea-brains, they're too "welfare" dependent. Crawl back under your rocks with your idiot MAGA friends.

DP, I think the PP was referring to Red "taker states" what are on welfare from blue states that pay more into the system than they receive. A tyranny of the minority is not sustainable.

Take off your KKK robe and step into the 21st century. You aren't fooling anyone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

It’s not red vs blue states, it’s cities vs rural areas. How would you divide it up?

That’s a problem. Look at Texas and Missouri. Four blue cities in Texas is the economic engine for the state, but the state is politically controlled by the rural red areas surrounding them. St. Louis and Kansas City is blue or light blue in Missouri, and those cities are the crown jewels for the state’s economics. However, the rural red areas are set to gerrymander the hel-ll out of those two cities, divide them into pieces and create red republican voting districts that extent up to 100 miles outside the respective city limits.

Unpopular opinion, but if you are blue in a red state, move. Let's the red states drown themselves.

That makes no sense. The red states are sending troops to oppress the blue states and passing laws to punish blue states while taking our money.

There is no hope for this country to stay together. You break it up by red and blue states. This keeps the state government functioning through the transition at least in the blue states. Also this would give a connectivity by red and blue states. Who knows what the red states will do. I do not see them all joining with Texas or Florida. Texas will definitely go it alone and Florida will not join Texas.

After that is done people can migrate where they want with approval of the state. Red states will not allow many unless they meet racial purity test.

The issue is how do you connect Colorado and New Mexico. Would have to work something out with either Mexico or Arizona. Mexico would most likely be more reasonable vs any red state. Pennsylvania would definitely be red state. A few tricky areas but nothing really that hard to figure out. State governors are pretty practical.

Though who cares as long as we are away from the red sates. Think of all the nice things we could have in the blue states. You could finally get a high speed train on both coast, an air traffic control that works, gun control, vaccines, national healthcare, none partisan FBI, no more Federalist Society, supreme Court reform, no more money wasted in the red states, etc

There are no such things as red states and blue states. It's 2025, not 1850 you twit. Take your racist MAGA crap and shove it up your rear end.

We are just trying to shed the welfare states. I thought that MAGAs didn’t like liberals. Go be maga by yourself, we are kind of over you.

You're advocating for severing ties with the states containing the highest African American populations because, according to you low IQ pea-brains, they're too "welfare" dependent. Crawl back under your rocks with your idiot MAGA friends.

DP, I think the PP was referring to Red "taker states" what are on welfare from blue states that pay more into the system than they receive. A tyranny of the minority is not sustainable.

Take off your KKK robe and step into the 21st century. You aren't fooling anyone.

Is there an adult that you can ask for help?

[Anonymous]

[img]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary.

Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense. There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK. Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s. Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.

It’s not red vs blue states, it’s cities vs rural areas. How would you divide it up?

That’s a problem. Look at Texas and Missouri. Four blue cities in Texas is the economic engine for the state, but the state is politically controlled by the rural red areas surrounding them. St. Louis and Kansas City is blue or light blue in Missouri, and those cities are the crown jewels for the state’s economics. However, the rural red areas are set to gerrymander the hel-ll out of those two cities, divide them into pieces and create red republican voting districts that extent up to 100 miles outside the respective city limits.

Unpopular opinion, but if you are blue in a red state, move. Let's the red states drown themselves.

That makes no sense. The red states are sending troops to oppress the blue states and passing laws to punish blue states while taking our money.

There is no hope for this country to stay together. You break it up by red and blue states. This keeps the state government functioning through the transition at least in the blue states. Also this would give a connectivity by red and blue states. Who knows what the red states will do. I do not see them all joining with Texas or Florida. Texas will definitely go it alone and Florida will not join Texas.

After that is done people can migrate where they want with approval of the state. Red states will not allow many unless they meet racial purity test.

The issue is how do you connect Colorado and New Mexico. Would have to work something out with either Mexico or Arizona. Mexico would most likely be more reasonable vs any red state. Pennsylvania would definitely be red state. A few tricky areas but nothing really that hard to figure out. State governors are pretty practical.

Though who cares as long as we are away from the red sates. Think of all the nice things we could have in the blue states. You could finally get a high speed train on both coast, an air traffic control that works, gun control, vaccines, national healthcare, none partisan FBI, no more Federalist Society, supreme Court reform, no more money wasted in the red states, etc

There are no such things as red states and blue states. It's 2025, not 1850 you twit. Take your racist MAGA crap and shove it up your rear end.

We are just trying to shed the welfare states. I thought that MAGAs didn’t like liberals. Go be maga by yourself, we are kind of over you.

You're advocating for severing ties with the states containing the highest African American populations because, according to you low IQ pea-brains, they're too "welfare" dependent. Crawl back under your rocks with your idiot MAGA friends.

DP, I think the PP was referring to Red "taker states" what are on welfare from blue states that pay more into the system than they receive. A tyranny of the minority is not sustainable.

Correct. Diversity is strength, which is why the bluest and richest states are most diverse. The red states are just anchors dragging us down, socially and economically.