Reply to US Super Regions?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "US Super Regions?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]States are banding together to overcome the damage that the current administration is doing to the federal system. Might this be the way of the future for the US as a whole and become the beginnings of dividing the US into separate regions with some type of weak  federal oversight?

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/03/us/western-health-alliance.html?smid=threads-nytimes[/quote]

Old Russian propaganda. This was promoted over a decade ago under the guise of social science from Russia.

Don’t fall for it. Besides it gives Trump the authority to keep the union together by any means necessary. [/quote]
Regardless of who promoted the idea originally, breaking up the US or at least providing regional autonomy makes a lot of sense.  There’s also precedence, for example Quebec/Canada, Catalonia/Spain, Scotland/UK.  Also the voluntary dissolution of Czechoslovakia in the 1990’s.  Honestly it’s the only realistic alternative we have given how hopelessly divided we are along tribal and cultural fault lines.[/quote]
It’s not red vs blue states, it’s cities vs rural areas. How would you divide it up?[/quote]
That’s a problem. Look at Texas and Missouri. Four blue cities in Texas is the economic engine for the state, but the state is politically controlled by the rural red areas surrounding them. St. Louis and Kansas City is blue or light blue in Missouri, and those cities are the crown jewels for the state’s economics. However, the rural red areas are set to gerrymander the hel-ll out of those two cities, divide them into pieces and create red republican voting districts that extent up to 100 miles outside the respective city limits. [/quote]

Unpopular opinion, but if you are blue in a red state, move. Let's the red states drown themselves. [/quote]

That makes no sense. The red states are sending troops to oppress the blue states and passing laws to punish blue states while taking our money.

There is no hope for this country to stay together. You break it up by red and blue states. This keeps the state government functioning through the transition at least in the blue states. Also this would give a connectivity by red and blue states. Who knows what the red states will do. I do not see them all joining with Texas or Florida. Texas will definitely go it alone and Florida will not join Texas.

After that is done people can migrate where they want with approval of the state. Red states will not allow many unless they meet racial purity test.

The issue is how do you connect Colorado and New Mexico. Would have to work something out with either Mexico or Arizona. Mexico would most likely be more reasonable vs any red state. Pennsylvania would definitely be red state. A few tricky areas but nothing really that hard to figure out. State governors are pretty practical.

Though who cares as long as we are away from the red sates. Think of all the nice things we could have in the blue states. You could finally get a high speed train on both coast, an air traffic control that works, gun control, vaccines, national healthcare, none partisan FBI, no more Federalist Society, supreme Court reform, no more money wasted in the red states, etc

[/quote]

There are no such things as red states and blue states. It's 2025, not 1850 you twit. Take your racist MAGA crap and shove it up your rear end.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics