2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some interesting decisions made for all-WCAC accolades this year.

Dematha fan?

No just thought how every team got 3 HMs was interesting. 7/10 goalies got something and felt like SJC players were a little over represented especially given injuries.

How does this work? Do coaches nominate players and there's a vote?

Coaches meet and vote. Hyper political go to shove all their own kids through. Kinda shocked that they actually got POTY right with that Heights kid.

Head scratcher pick.

I don't see how it was a head scratcher at all to be honest. He had like 70 CTOs guarding #1's and scored like every game. Single handledly put a that very mediocre team in a close game against us and a lot of others.

A good player on a bad team not headed to anywhere bc the schools didn't see it. Moral coming close but not winning. The Heights won a grand total of one WCAC game this year against the top 8 teams. This is a typical everyone gets trophy award and a slap for the better schools and players.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some interesting decisions made for all-WCAC accolades this year.

Dematha fan?

No just thought how every team got 3 HMs was interesting. 7/10 goalies got something and felt like SJC players were a little over represented especially given injuries.

How does this work? Do coaches nominate players and there's a vote?

Coaches meet and vote. Hyper political go to shove all their own kids through. Kinda shocked that they actually got POTY right with that Heights kid.

Head scratcher pick.

I don't see how it was a head scratcher at all to be honest. He had like 70 CTOs guarding #1's and scored like every game. Single handledly put a that very mediocre team in a close game against us and a lot of others.

A good player on a bad team not headed to anywhere bc the schools didn't see it. Moral coming close but not winning. The Heights won a grand total of one WCAC game this year against the top 8 teams. This is a typical everyone gets trophy award and a slap for the better schools and players.

He started for NL and had offers to Yale, Navy, and Cuse. But go ahead and trash successful kids because your a fat lard and your kid didn't win it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some interesting decisions made for all-WCAC accolades this year.

Dematha fan?

No just thought how every team got 3 HMs was interesting. 7/10 goalies got something and felt like SJC players were a little over represented especially given injuries.

How does this work? Do coaches nominate players and there's a vote?

Coaches meet and vote. Hyper political go to shove all their own kids through. Kinda shocked that they actually got POTY right with that Heights kid.

Head scratcher pick.

I don't see how it was a head scratcher at all to be honest. He had like 70 CTOs guarding #1's and scored like every game. Single handledly put a that very mediocre team in a close game against us and a lot of others.

A good player on a bad team not headed to anywhere bc the schools didn't see it. Moral coming close but not winning. The Heights won a grand total of one WCAC game this year against the top 8 teams. This is a typical everyone gets trophy award and a slap for the better schools and players.

Coaches voted for him for a reason, but you may have been to busy with the divorce bills to watch him lock up your best player.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some interesting decisions made for all-WCAC accolades this year.

Dematha fan?

No just thought how every team got 3 HMs was interesting. 7/10 goalies got something and felt like SJC players were a little over represented especially given injuries.

The 3 honorable mentions are picked by each teams coach. no voting involved.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some interesting decisions made for all-WCAC accolades this year.

Dematha fan?

No just thought how every team got 3 HMs was interesting. 7/10 goalies got something and felt like SJC players were a little over represented especially given injuries.

How does this work? Do coaches nominate players and there's a vote?

Coaches meet and vote. Hyper political go to shove all their own kids through. Kinda shocked that they actually got POTY right with that Heights kid.

Head scratcher pick.

I don't see how it was a head scratcher at all to be honest. He had like 70 CTOs guarding #1's and scored like every game. Single handledly put a that very mediocre team in a close game against us and a lot of others.

A good player on a bad team not headed to anywhere bc the schools didn't see it. Moral coming close but not winning. The Heights won a grand total of one WCAC game this year against the top 8 teams. This is a typical everyone gets trophy award and a slap for the better schools and players.

Coaches voted for him for a reason, but you may have been to busy with the divorce bills to watch him lock up your best player.

lol on those offers. I know the family and they would have jumped at navy. He had full pay offers at d3. Coaches gave a ridiculous handout to the school.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some interesting decisions made for all-WCAC accolades this year.

Dematha fan?

No just thought how every team got 3 HMs was interesting. 7/10 goalies got something and felt like SJC players were a little over represented especially given injuries.

How does this work? Do coaches nominate players and there's a vote?

Coaches meet and vote. Hyper political go to shove all their own kids through. Kinda shocked that they actually got POTY right with that Heights kid.

Head scratcher pick.

I don't see how it was a head scratcher at all to be honest. He had like 70 CTOs guarding #1's and scored like every game. Single handledly put a that very mediocre team in a close game against us and a lot of others.

For every over the head he landed, he left his underskilled teammates man down when he missed. But I guess it paid off.

[Anonymous]

who should have been poy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:who should have been poy?

I think the DM attack. Best player on the best team. In the IAC, the coaches split the award between the Landon attack and Bullis attack. That was a cop out too.

[Anonymous]

Why is the POTY uncommitted? He is very talented for sure.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who should have been poy?

I think the DM attack. Best player on the best team. In the IAC, the coaches split the award between the Landon attack and Bullis attack. That was a cop out too.

I think the IAC Coaches also got it wrong by doing a co-player of the year award. While Landon's Murry (Bucknell) and Bullis' Mahar (Penn) are exceptional attackman, I really thought the best player in the IAC was Landon's defenseman Cassidy (Penn). He shut down all opposing players top offensive players.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is the POTY uncommitted? He is very talented for sure.

Read between the lines on the reply to supposed offers. Lacrosse is a full pay sport for field players.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:who should have been poy?

I think the DM attack. Best player on the best team. In the IAC, the coaches split the award between the Landon attack and Bullis attack. That was a cop out too.

I think the IAC Coaches also got it wrong by doing a co-player of the year award. While Landon's Murry (Bucknell) and Bullis' Mahar (Penn) are exceptional attackman, I really thought the best player in the IAC was Landon's defenseman Cassidy (Penn). He shut down all opposing players top offensive players.

No chance. Landon loses at least 5 without the attack. The pole is good but they still might have the same record. Landon had 5 poles they juggled play time, granted the Penn kid stayed on the field when he wasn't taking a penalty a game.

[Anonymous]

What are the odds Speaks goes after the Heights 2027 attackman to transfer?

The coach is spineless!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What are the odds Speaks goes after the Heights 2027 attackman to transfer?

The coach is spineless!

Lol. You clearly don’t know him. Don’t be mad your kid didn’t get a call.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some interesting decisions made for all-WCAC accolades this year.

Dematha fan?

No just thought how every team got 3 HMs was interesting. 7/10 goalies got something and felt like SJC players were a little over represented especially given injuries.

The 3 honorable mentions are picked by each teams coach. no voting involved.

Ah, some of those make a lot more sense if that's the case.