2026 Private School Boys Lacrosse Commentary, Scores, and Updates

[Anonymous]

This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.

[Anonymous]

has the Washington Post All Met section even been released yet?

Maybe I missed it

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.

Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.

Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.

The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.

Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.

The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.

So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.

Do I have all this right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.

Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.

The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.

So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.

Do I have all this right?

*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.

Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.

The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.

So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.

Do I have all this right?

*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!

"self awareness,,,mopes,,,look inward,,,trash,,,zip it,,,your son rode the bench,,,stronger than you" all put downs used by the dcum pp(s) when talking about an opinion award and an alternative or reasons why another player could have won.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the best player in the area is the Spalding LSM - Roy Cooper.

Think you mean D.B. Cooper.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.

Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.

The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.

So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.

Do I have all this right?

*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!

"self awareness,,,mopes,,,look inward,,,trash,,,zip it,,,your son rode the bench,,,stronger than you" all put downs used by the dcum pp(s) when talking about an opinion award and an alternative or reasons why another player could have won.

So the old bit about sticks and stones and names was wrong. Want some bactine? Or perhaps some friends? Maybe a therapy coupon?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.

Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.

The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.

So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.

Do I have all this right?

*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!

"self awareness,,,mopes,,,look inward,,,trash,,,zip it,,,your son rode the bench,,,stronger than you" all put downs used by the dcum pp(s) when talking about an opinion award and an alternative or reasons why another player could have won.

You started out demeaning not just the player, but his entire team. Then you threw in a backhanded thank you for your service so peeps know you're still a good guy despite that and 'merica. You weren't looking for a discussion, you were looking for validation and a mob. Or what you got, reciprocation and a platform. Now you're crying hard with the victim card.

You're not real good at this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.

Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.

The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.

So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.

Do I have all this right?

*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!

"self awareness,,,mopes,,,look inward,,,trash,,,zip it,,,your son rode the bench,,,stronger than you" all put downs used by the dcum pp(s) when talking about an opinion award and an alternative or reasons why another player could have won.

You started out demeaning not just the player, but his entire team. Then you threw in a backhanded thank you for your service so peeps know you're still a good guy despite that and 'merica. You weren't looking for a discussion, you were looking for validation and a mob. Or what you got, reciprocation and a platform. Now you're crying hard with the victim card.

You're not real good at this.

And you're worse. Quotes were provided, but I don't see anything from you. I believe almost every single post had something like - "really good player but "
"mob,,,crying,,,victim,,,bactine,,,friends"

Go tell someone to wear a mask. You're right, snark does feel good for a brief moment.

[Anonymous]

I thought The Heights was a christian school? The amount of vitriol spewing from a backer is really up there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is Cal Ripken 1991. Good player plus bad team equals stats better than other contenders.

Right bc it’s just about that stats. Maybe character both helped the kid and hurt yours, which from the looks of it passed directly from you. Look inward.

The dcum way, no discussion just compliance.

So what you'd like to see on here is more parent entitlement that their kid is the bestest, the most specialest (see what I did there?)?
And you would like us to pick up the mantle for advocating for your son as well? Get a quorum, maybe? This is after you've been ripping the real POY, because you don't think his teammates were good enough to consider him.

Do I have all this right?

*checks thread* yes it appears you are correct!

"self awareness,,,mopes,,,look inward,,,trash,,,zip it,,,your son rode the bench,,,stronger than you" all put downs used by the dcum pp(s) when talking about an opinion award and an alternative or reasons why another player could have won.

You started out demeaning not just the player, but his entire team. Then you threw in a backhanded thank you for your service so peeps know you're still a good guy despite that and 'merica. You weren't looking for a discussion, you were looking for validation and a mob. Or what you got, reciprocation and a platform. Now you're crying hard with the victim card.

You're not real good at this.

And you're worse. Quotes were provided, but I don't see anything from you. I believe almost every single post had something like - "really good player but "
"mob,,,crying,,,victim,,,bactine,,,friends"

Go tell someone to wear a mask. You're right, snark does feel good for a brief moment.

"not a good look". Not working on the rest of the quotes, or even that one (which says in error the team won POY) as people can read. You sound hurt, and for that I can speak for everyone that makes us sad.
Masks don't really work, but if they make you feel more confortable, go for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:has the Washington Post All Met section even been released yet?

Maybe I missed it

No you are spot on. I think this is an argument about absolutely nothing because that kid did not and will not get POY.

[Anonymous]

Let's put this POTY stuff to bed. You all have beaten a dead horse, and neither side looks good anymore. Several kids could make a claim to POTY, but only one can win, and the kid who won is certainly a good enough.