Assuming this is all true, it means it’s already identified / being looked into. The soap dispensers were from a DOD IG audit. GAO presumably did the work and made recommendations related to the waste you mentioned. So systems in place already are doing that work. Also, I don’t know the specifics of the tourism $ in Egypt but I did take a class in grad school on soft diplomacy and its impacts. (Eg the cherry trees in DC were a gift / example of soft diplomacy) I remember asking - when I interned at a policy think tank 20 years ago - a presenter from the state Dept why the US was paying for irrigation in a Middle Eastern country. The answer was that it enabled people to grow cotton. A huge percentage of the population was men under 25 and if they didn’t have irrigation and didn’t farm cotton they were more likely to grow poppies (less water?) and make opiates or accept payments to engage in terrorism. It’s in the US’s national security interests for people in other countries to be able to thrive at jobs that don’t hurt the US. |
| Vivek was right in continue to not fund some of these stupid programs. Govt waste too much money |
Yes! I was talking to someone about this earlier today and came to the same conclusion that most of what they claim to want to do is already handled by agency OIGs and the GAO. How is creating a new faux agency going to make things better? Also, I don’t understand how the party that likes to consider themselves soooo patriotic hates the actual employees of this country. It’s so hypocritical to claim to love America, but want to make being a federal employee a completely miserable experience. These “brilliant” corporate minds should understand you don’t hire and retain strong performers by bashing them and threatening people’s jobs. Making federal service a miserable experience is a sure fire way to make agencies inefficient. |
This.There will be lots of Trump turnover. Working as a fed head is too restrictive for many of these people. |
I've worked in government a long time and been able to overhaul a few things that were truly outdated and dumb. But more often, once you look under the hood you find a reason it's being done that way. Not always a beneficial reason (though sometimes!) but definitely an intractable reason that other people would have fixed already if they could. Fixing those types of problems takes a huge amount of knowledge and resources, not a hatchet. |
Yes. Time to dredge up the concept of Chesterton’s Fence. |
|
Do not underestimate the drive of an autistic person. Even if they achieve 2% in staff cut that's a big deal
|
yep that was my first thought too. |
Did someone put Barron in charge? |
| I survived the Gore Commission, which cut a lot more than DOGE will. |
| They will have the last laugh and some of you will be joining the unemployed line. |
Or move on to jobs that pay better |
|
they have no power.
I will just point and laugh. DOGE is a joke anyway. |
DOGE or no DOGE they are coming for your jobs. And some of you will be unemployed. If anyone thinks this time around they will leave the federal workforce intact then you are not paying attention to their determination. |
Why does this make you happy? |