Do Michelle Obama and Beyonce advance Kamala at all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Going into the home stretch with a heavy dose of celebrities is not helpful. She needs to reach working and middle class whites. She needs to give cynical and mistrustful young people a reason to vote for her. She needs to shore up support among black men. She needs to make socially conservative folks - Hispanics in particular - comfortable voting for a progressive woman from Oakland.

Beyonce is not bringing you those people.

Harris' problem is that she seems out of touch with the concerns of everyday Americans. And the fact that she was anointed by the party elite and never had to stand before primary voters is not helping. The last thing Harris needs is celebrities. Trump is running a much more savvy campaign. He knows which podcasts matter to the audiences that count in this election. His ads are on point when it comes to reaching socially conservative folks. It's direct, guerrilla campaigning to the people he needs on the issues that emotionally resonate with them. It's not smooth. It's not perfect. It's not rigidly professional. But it gets the job done.

Meanwhile, the Harris campaign is lost in their safe, corporate, detached, market-tested, cold drivel. As always, every Democratic campaign professional needs to be fired and barred from politics forever. An absolutely useless class of lackeys and parasites. Who the F thought Beyonce would be a good idea. Probably the same people that thought Oprah was a great idea too. Idiots.

You have to give it to Trump

He gets the pulse of the people

If that is really true, then our country has turned into a piece of shit where people care about all the wrong things. Embrace lies, embrace hatred, embrace division, embrace grift and fraud.

I don't want to live like this. Trump is shit. I do not want to hand over the reins of this country to someone who cares only about staying out of jail and making a buck for himself so he can continue to bring out the worst in his followers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep calling women who want to control their own reproductive health satan (as well as misinformation about abortion after birth - you are crazy).

Keep calling women satan. That’s a winning message. NOT.

There are so many great, reliable birth control options. Our mothers and grandmothers would have had completely different lives if they had the options we do.

What do women want? To be able to kill their babies up to the point of birth.

I just can’t get behind that.

Please tell me you’re not that dumb. 99% of the later term abortions are medically necessary to save the life of mom or the fetus is proven to not be able to survive outside the womb. No one is voluntarily killing an 8month of baby. How are people this stupid and brainwashed?

Would you want the government making the decision for you if it came down to your wife dying or your (most likely) dead fetus?

If republicans are the party of “Freedom’’ then they should be all over maintaining the ability to save their wife’s life. FWIW I am a fairly strong catholic.

Late term abortionist Warren Hern stated in an interview that more than half of his patients have no medical issues:

"Abortions that come after devastating medical diagnoses can be easier for some people to understand. But Hern estimates that at least half, and sometimes more, of the women who come to the clinic do not have these diagnoses."

Washington post columnist Richard Cohen, who admitted to using talking points provided by the abortion industry, later conceded that he was wrong when he said late term abortions were only performed when the life of the mother was in danger or when the baby was severely deformed. He and his colleague identified that most late term abortions are in fact done for convenience reasons:

"But back then I also was led to believe that these late-term abortions were extremely rare and performed only when the life of the mother was in danger or the fetus irreparably deformed. I was wrong.

I didn't know it at the time, of course, and maybe the people who supplied my data -- the usual pro-choice groups -- were giving me what they thought was precise information. And precise I was. I wrote that "just four one-hundredths of one percent of abortions are performed after 24 weeks" and that "most, if not all, are performed because the fetus is found to be severely damaged or because the life of the mother is clearly in danger."

"It turns out, though, that no one really knows what percentage of abortions are late-term. No one keeps figures. But my Washington Post colleague David Brown looked behind the purported figures and the purported rationale for these abortions and found something other than medical crises of one sort or another. After interviewing doctors who performed late-term abortions and surveying the literature, Brown -- a physician himself -- wrote: "These doctors say that while a significant number of their patients have late abortions for medical reasons, many others -- perhaps the majority -- do not."

This is what Beyonce and other Democrats are advocating for. Abortion without limits. It is evil.

Honestly sit down and shut up. You don't understand this complex issue and you never will.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s your experience in campaign strategy?

Do you think Michelle Obama and Beyonce Carter do not understand persuasion?

OP here - I have no experience, just a regular joe. That said, it seems pretty obvious where Harris is lagging demographically.

[…] If he beats Kamala this time around, it will be at least partly because he was smarter in using new media to his advantage.

If he beats Kamala this time around it will be due entirely to the corporate media sanewashing everything he does. People like you are helping, of course, by posing as a sane appearing “I thought she was going to win until” person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep calling women who want to control their own reproductive health satan (as well as misinformation about abortion after birth - you are crazy).

Keep calling women satan. That’s a winning message. NOT.

There are so many great, reliable birth control options. Our mothers and grandmothers would have had completely different lives if they had the options we do.

What do women want? To be able to kill their babies up to the point of birth.

I just can’t get behind that.

Please tell me you’re not that dumb. 99% of the later term abortions are medically necessary to save the life of mom or the fetus is proven to not be able to survive outside the womb. No one is voluntarily killing an 8month of baby. How are people this stupid and brainwashed?

Would you want the government making the decision for you if it came down to your wife dying or your (most likely) dead fetus?

If republicans are the party of “Freedom’’ then they should be all over maintaining the ability to save their wife’s life. FWIW I am a fairly strong catholic.

Late term abortionist Warren Hern stated in an interview that more than half of his patients have no medical issues:

"Abortions that come after devastating medical diagnoses can be easier for some people to understand. But Hern estimates that at least half, and sometimes more, of the women who come to the clinic do not have these diagnoses."

Washington post columnist Richard Cohen, who admitted to using talking points provided by the abortion industry, later conceded that he was wrong when he said late term abortions were only performed when the life of the mother was in danger or when the baby was severely deformed. He and his colleague identified that most late term abortions are in fact done for convenience reasons:

"But back then I also was led to believe that these late-term abortions were extremely rare and performed only when the life of the mother was in danger or the fetus irreparably deformed. I was wrong.

I didn't know it at the time, of course, and maybe the people who supplied my data -- the usual pro-choice groups -- were giving me what they thought was precise information. And precise I was. I wrote that "just four one-hundredths of one percent of abortions are performed after 24 weeks" and that "most, if not all, are performed because the fetus is found to be severely damaged or because the life of the mother is clearly in danger."

"It turns out, though, that no one really knows what percentage of abortions are late-term. No one keeps figures. But my Washington Post colleague David Brown looked behind the purported figures and the purported rationale for these abortions and found something other than medical crises of one sort or another. After interviewing doctors who performed late-term abortions and surveying the literature, Brown -- a physician himself -- wrote: "These doctors say that while a significant number of their patients have late abortions for medical reasons, many others -- perhaps the majority -- do not."

This is what Beyonce and other Democrats are advocating for. Abortion without limits. It is evil.

Stop lying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No don’t help at all, other than to give Kamala a feel good moment that 30K people have come out to be part of her rally.

They are doing a lot more than coming out to be part of a rally. They are voting.

The ladies are voting and they are bringing as many of their friends and family along with them as they can.

Right, they're loading up the car with all their friends and family, down to the polls. Because they all live in the same polling place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep calling women who want to control their own reproductive health satan (as well as misinformation about abortion after birth - you are crazy).

Keep calling women satan. That’s a winning message. NOT.

There are so many great, reliable birth control options. Our mothers and grandmothers would have had completely different lives if they had the options we do.

What do women want? To be able to kill their babies up to the point of birth.

I just can’t get behind that.

Please tell me you’re not that dumb. 99% of the later term abortions are medically necessary to save the life of mom or the fetus is proven to not be able to survive outside the womb. No one is voluntarily killing an 8month of baby. How are people this stupid and brainwashed?

Would you want the government making the decision for you if it came down to your wife dying or your (most likely) dead fetus?

If republicans are the party of “Freedom’’ then they should be all over maintaining the ability to save their wife’s life. FWIW I am a fairly strong catholic.

Late term abortionist Warren Hern stated in an interview that more than half of his patients have no medical issues:

"Abortions that come after devastating medical diagnoses can be easier for some people to understand. But Hern estimates that at least half, and sometimes more, of the women who come to the clinic do not have these diagnoses."

Washington post columnist Richard Cohen, who admitted to using talking points provided by the abortion industry, later conceded that he was wrong when he said late term abortions were only performed when the life of the mother was in danger or when the baby was severely deformed. He and his colleague identified that most late term abortions are in fact done for convenience reasons:

"But back then I also was led to believe that these late-term abortions were extremely rare and performed only when the life of the mother was in danger or the fetus irreparably deformed. I was wrong.

I didn't know it at the time, of course, and maybe the people who supplied my data -- the usual pro-choice groups -- were giving me what they thought was precise information. And precise I was. I wrote that "just four one-hundredths of one percent of abortions are performed after 24 weeks" and that "most, if not all, are performed because the fetus is found to be severely damaged or because the life of the mother is clearly in danger."

"It turns out, though, that no one really knows what percentage of abortions are late-term. No one keeps figures. But my Washington Post colleague David Brown looked behind the purported figures and the purported rationale for these abortions and found something other than medical crises of one sort or another. After interviewing doctors who performed late-term abortions and surveying the literature, Brown -- a physician himself -- wrote: "These doctors say that while a significant number of their patients have late abortions for medical reasons, many others -- perhaps the majority -- do not."

This is what Beyonce and other Democrats are advocating for. Abortion without limits. It is evil.

Honestly sit down and shut up. You don't understand this complex issue and you never will.

Actually I support abortion rights with limits because most Americans want it. I understand there are cases when women feel it is for the best but there is something inherently evil about killing a baby in the 3rd trimester for elective reasons. Nothing complicated about that.

[Anonymous]

People were leaving this rally and chanting Trump. They were there for a free concert, didn't get one, and left. This is not the flex you think it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People were leaving this rally and chanting Trump. They were there for a free concert, didn't get one, and left. This is not the flex you think it is.

Then why can't you shut up about it and stop making threads about it? The celebrities seem to be in your head even worse than they are in Donald Trump's little skull. He cannot handle it and he can't shut up about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Keep calling women who want to control their own reproductive health satan (as well as misinformation about abortion after birth - you are crazy).

Keep calling women satan. That’s a winning message. NOT.

There are so many great, reliable birth control options. Our mothers and grandmothers would have had completely different lives if they had the options we do.

What do women want? To be able to kill their babies up to the point of birth.

I just can’t get behind that.

Please tell me you’re not that dumb. 99% of the later term abortions are medically necessary to save the life of mom or the fetus is proven to not be able to survive outside the womb. No one is voluntarily killing an 8month of baby. How are people this stupid and brainwashed?

Would you want the government making the decision for you if it came down to your wife dying or your (most likely) dead fetus?

If republicans are the party of “Freedom’’ then they should be all over maintaining the ability to save their wife’s life. FWIW I am a fairly strong catholic.

Late term abortionist Warren Hern stated in an interview that more than half of his patients have no medical issues:

"Abortions that come after devastating medical diagnoses can be easier for some people to understand. But Hern estimates that at least half, and sometimes more, of the women who come to the clinic do not have these diagnoses."

Washington post columnist Richard Cohen, who admitted to using talking points provided by the abortion industry, later conceded that he was wrong when he said late term abortions were only performed when the life of the mother was in danger or when the baby was severely deformed. He and his colleague identified that most late term abortions are in fact done for convenience reasons:

"But back then I also was led to believe that these late-term abortions were extremely rare and performed only when the life of the mother was in danger or the fetus irreparably deformed. I was wrong.

I didn't know it at the time, of course, and maybe the people who supplied my data -- the usual pro-choice groups -- were giving me what they thought was precise information. And precise I was. I wrote that "just four one-hundredths of one percent of abortions are performed after 24 weeks" and that "most, if not all, are performed because the fetus is found to be severely damaged or because the life of the mother is clearly in danger."

"It turns out, though, that no one really knows what percentage of abortions are late-term. No one keeps figures. But my Washington Post colleague David Brown looked behind the purported figures and the purported rationale for these abortions and found something other than medical crises of one sort or another. After interviewing doctors who performed late-term abortions and surveying the literature, Brown -- a physician himself -- wrote: "These doctors say that while a significant number of their patients have late abortions for medical reasons, many others -- perhaps the majority -- do not."

This is what Beyonce and other Democrats are advocating for. Abortion without limits. It is evil.

Stop lying.

The only person lying is the previous poster stating 99% of late term abortions are for medical reasons/fetal issues when in reality many are elective.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:People were leaving this rally and chanting Trump. They were there for a free concert, didn't get one, and left. This is not the flex you think it is.

I would never go to a political rally of someone I wouldn't vote for. Would you? If you believe this you're deluded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No don’t help at all, other than to give Kamala a feel good moment that 30K people have come out to be part of her rally.

They are doing a lot more than coming out to be part of a rally. They are voting.

The ladies are voting and they are bringing as many of their friends and family along with them as they can.

Right, they're loading up the car with all their friends and family, down to the polls. Because they all live in the same polling place.

Actually, I think a lot of these posters do live in an insular bubble of family and friends. They don't socialize with anyone who doesn't agree with their opinions. Makes sense that they all go to the same polling place.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No don’t help at all, other than to give Kamala a feel good moment that 30K people have come out to be part of her rally.

They are doing a lot more than coming out to be part of a rally. They are voting.

The ladies are voting and they are bringing as many of their friends and family along with them as they can.

Right, they're loading up the car with all their friends and family, down to the polls. Because they all live in the same polling place.

Holy missed the point. Help get out the vote for Harris in any one of the multiple possible ways that voters can cast their votes.

When are you going to vote? Where are you going to vote? Do you need a ride? Do you understand the correct day if you're going to vote in person? ,do you understand the hours that the polls are open? do you understand when early voting is? Do you understand where early voting is? Do you understand how to get your absentee ballot? Did you get your absentee valid? Did you fill out your absentee valid and send it in?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People were leaving this rally and chanting Trump. They were there for a free concert, didn't get one, and left. This is not the flex you think it is.

I would never go to a political rally of someone I wouldn't vote for. Would you? If you believe this you're deluded.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No don’t help at all, other than to give Kamala a feel good moment that 30K people have come out to be part of her rally.

They are doing a lot more than coming out to be part of a rally. They are voting.

The ladies are voting and they are bringing as many of their friends and family along with them as they can.

Right, they're loading up the car with all their friends and family, down to the polls. Because they all live in the same polling place.

Holy missed the point. Help get out the vote for Harris in any one of the multiple possible ways that voters can cast their votes.

When are you going to vote? Where are you going to vote? Do you need a ride? Do you understand the correct day if you're going to vote in person? ,do you understand the hours that the polls are open? do you understand when early voting is? Do you understand where early voting is? Do you understand how to get your absentee ballot? Did you get your absentee valid? Did you fill out your absentee valid and send it in?

So you'll only load up your car for Harris voters? That's not right. Where is the democracy here? I'm tired of all this GO VOTE OMG but what you're really saying is GO VOTE the way I want you to. Else, you can stay home.

Sooo....would you let a Trump supporter get in your car and take him to the polls? I'd love to hear an answer on that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:No don’t help at all, other than to give Kamala a feel good moment that 30K people have come out to be part of her rally.

They are doing a lot more than coming out to be part of a rally. They are voting.

The ladies are voting and they are bringing as many of their friends and family along with them as they can.

Right, they're loading up the car with all their friends and family, down to the polls. Because they all live in the same polling place.

Holy missed the point. Help get out the vote for Harris in any one of the multiple possible ways that voters can cast their votes.

When are you going to vote? Where are you going to vote? Do you need a ride? Do you understand the correct day if you're going to vote in person? ,do you understand the hours that the polls are open? do you understand when early voting is? Do you understand where early voting is? Do you understand how to get your absentee ballot? Did you get your absentee valid? Did you fill out your absentee valid and send it in?

Pretty sad that some voters need that much guidance for such an important election..