
That didn’t happen. |
You don’t have to agree with Israeli foreign policy, but if you disagree with Israel’s right to exist, that is anti-Semitic. |
PP you are responding to- i am a different poster, I didn’t make that statement, and I thought we were talking about the article. Why doesn’t anyone ever want to talk about the article?!?! |
Why is not supporting a theocracy's right to exist as a theocracy antisemitic? |
So are you also not supporting all the Muslim theocracies in the world? |
Netanyahu’s Likud has become increasingly extremist over time, and realistically, any leader who stays in power for 3 decades has more in common with dictators than democracies. I have become increasingly wary of Israeli foreign policy as Netanyahu’s decades long rule has a lot more similarity to Russia under Putin than any western democracy. I do not support Israel under Netanyahu. I am in favor of a two state solution. In the immediate future, I support a ceasefire to at least slow the killing of civilians. |
Then to answer your question, no, that is not antisemitic. |
Correct. |
I don't mind talking about the article, and I have. I don't think it was a lazy article. I think you are missing the point of it, or refuse to see it though. When someone makes a joke against a minority that is a certain type of joke, it absolutely is racist/antisemitic/bigoted. It's true if a teen makes that joke too, and should be condemned, not brushed off in a "oh, well, kids will be kids!" type of way. |
I reread the opening. I don't see a single reference to attacks on Jews, the protest was against Israel and there is no insinuation that any animus was directed to the 16 year old |
+1 There's a religion's right to exist in countries with freedom of religion. Sure build a little building and call it a religion. You don't get to commandeer land tho. I can't think of any way I could invent a theocracy, establish land and a government that's already outside of government, and be head of my own theocracy. Since I can't do it new, it's not a right. Certainly not a "right" for any existing ones. If they can keep it up, fine. Not a right though. |
Of course not. Theocracy as a form of government always leads to horrible human rights abuses. It’s terrible when Israeli Jews commit genocide and it’s terrible when Iranian Muslims commit human rights atrocities. How is this hard to understand? |
I’m not brushing it off- I actually lived that experience as a Middle Eastern person after 9-11 (which was a very, very distressing time in the US), and while my experience as a high schooler was directly related to the political and cultural tumult of the time, it was a product of that specific moment and much more complex than people just suddenly being racist towards Arabs. This doesn’t mean racism doesn’t exist or that antisemitism doesn’t exist, it means that this specific event of the war doesn’t determine the scope of what being a Jewish person in the US actually means. 9-11 changed a lot but fundamentally did not change my interactions with other Americans as an Arab American. It didn’t define my existence. |
So you’re out there protesting them, signing petitions, talking about how to overthrow them with all your friends? |
Because I don’t see anyone suggesting Iran shouldn’t exist. |