Jackson Lewis Report Who is Who?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:25 wasn’t fired

Wait, they LET him resign?!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:25 wasn’t fired

Wait, they LET him resign?!

Of course.
Just like John Vigna convicted sex offender.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is employee 5? Sounds like the only one who questioned Jb getting promoted.

Maybe Dawson?

No way! It says Beidleman sent employee 5 flirtatious texts from 2020-2022 that she did not object to at the time.

Did I miss that in the report???!! Page #????? Thank you!

Wasn't one of his accusers texting him nude photos?

Yes, but the other 30-some victims were not. Moreover, the fact that he engaged in a sexual relationship with an employee is a problem in and of itself. Finally, in 2024, we believe that women have the right to end a relationship without being publicly humiliated, harassed, and effectively demoted. No means no, even if someone said yes earlier. Please catch up.

This is a crock of bull. There aren’t 30 some victims. I find people whine and complain about managers/bosses they don’t like all the time. That’s why he lasted as long as he did because some teachers are just plain disgruntled. No one publicly humiliated, harassed nor demoted the social studies teacher. She was bold and adult enough to send nude pics to her boss when he should have fired her for that yet instead she set him up and now decides to sue him because she is thousands of dollars in debt. I hope mcps puts policies in place to hold subordinates accountable for sexual harassment and indecent actions upon their bosses. These aren’t children. This is the workplace where EVERYONE KNOWS BETTER!

I had read there were around 30 anonymous complaints but for all I know it's the same person complaining 30 times.

Because these are anonymous hard to say if they're even credible. The only named source that I know of was the teacher who was sexting him nude pics.

After all these months still spinning the same lie. Takes gumption but the ship has sailed. When the lawyers MCPS paid to make themselves look good create a report like this that is so scathing it’s clear that it’s time to stop your nonsense and move on with life

Or keep at it. Maybe you’re recently unemployed and have nothing better to do

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is employee 5? Sounds like the only one who questioned Jb getting promoted.

Maybe Dawson?

No way! It says Beidleman sent employee 5 flirtatious texts from 2020-2022 that she did not object to at the time.

Did I miss that in the report???!! Page #????? Thank you!

Wasn't one of his accusers texting him nude photos?

Yes, but the other 30-some victims were not. Moreover, the fact that he engaged in a sexual relationship with an employee is a problem in and of itself. Finally, in 2024, we believe that women have the right to end a relationship without being publicly humiliated, harassed, and effectively demoted. No means no, even if someone said yes earlier. Please catch up.

This is a crock of bull. There aren’t 30 some victims. I find people whine and complain about managers/bosses they don’t like all the time. That’s why he lasted as long as he did because some teachers are just plain disgruntled. No one publicly humiliated, harassed nor demoted the social studies teacher. She was bold and adult enough to send nude pics to her boss when he should have fired her for that yet instead she set him up and now decides to sue him because she is thousands of dollars in debt. I hope mcps puts policies in place to hold subordinates accountable for sexual harassment and indecent actions upon their bosses. These aren’t children. This is the workplace where EVERYONE KNOWS BETTER!

I had read there were around 30 anonymous complaints but for all I know it's the same person complaining 30 times.

The Washington Post reporters, the Jackson Lewis attorneys, and the OIG inspectors know a lot more than you do.

Then why do they refuse to share any credible evidence? All I'm getting here is gossip and conspiracy theories.

[Anonymous]

Here’s a fun question: why isn’t Joel person number 1 and every number from there builds from there.

The randomness of this number just shows how MCPS was still trying to keep everything a secret

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is employee 5? Sounds like the only one who questioned Jb getting promoted.

Maybe Dawson?

No way! It says Beidleman sent employee 5 flirtatious texts from 2020-2022 that she did not object to at the time.

Did I miss that in the report???!! Page #????? Thank you!

Wasn't one of his accusers texting him nude photos?

Yes, but the other 30-some victims were not. Moreover, the fact that he engaged in a sexual relationship with an employee is a problem in and of itself. Finally, in 2024, we believe that women have the right to end a relationship without being publicly humiliated, harassed, and effectively demoted. No means no, even if someone said yes earlier. Please catch up.

This is a crock of bull. There aren’t 30 some victims. I find people whine and complain about managers/bosses they don’t like all the time. That’s why he lasted as long as he did because some teachers are just plain disgruntled. No one publicly humiliated, harassed nor demoted the social studies teacher. She was bold and adult enough to send nude pics to her boss when he should have fired her for that yet instead she set him up and now decides to sue him because she is thousands of dollars in debt. I hope mcps puts policies in place to hold subordinates accountable for sexual harassment and indecent actions upon their bosses. These aren’t children. This is the workplace where EVERYONE KNOWS BETTER!

I had read there were around 30 anonymous complaints but for all I know it's the same person complaining 30 times.

The Washington Post reporters, the Jackson Lewis attorneys, and the OIG inspectors know a lot more than you do.

Then why do they refuse to share any credible evidence? All I'm getting here is gossip and conspiracy theories.

[Anonymous]

What about Morris? Is she still around or has she been bounced/resigned. Hell, did anyone get terminated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What about Morris? Is she still around or has she been bounced/resigned. Hell, did anyone get terminated?

I am unable to find anything other than she was placed on admin leave:

"The district also confirmed last week that Beidleman’s former supervisor, associate superintendent of schools and well-being Diane Morris, is on administrative leave with pay. Morris, the principal of Farquhar before Beidleman, managed Beidleman’s standard five-year evaluation during the 2022-2023 school year, according to a confidential internal school district document obtained by The Post."

And where is Eric Minus now?

"When parents complained about the assembly, then-Director of School Support and Improvement Eric Minus, Beidleman’s boss, spoke with teachers. One told him about additional instances of workplace misconduct, the teacher said in an interview. But when another tried to do the same, Minus asked to confine the discussion to what Beidleman had said at the assemblies, she said. Several educators were aware that the two men were friends."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is employee 5? Sounds like the only one who questioned Jb getting promoted.

Maybe Dawson?

No way! It says Beidleman sent employee 5 flirtatious texts from 2020-2022 that she did not object to at the time.

Did I miss that in the report???!! Page #????? Thank you!

Wasn't one of his accusers texting him nude photos?

Yes, but the other 30-some victims were not. Moreover, the fact that he engaged in a sexual relationship with an employee is a problem in and of itself. Finally, in 2024, we believe that women have the right to end a relationship without being publicly humiliated, harassed, and effectively demoted. No means no, even if someone said yes earlier. Please catch up.

This is a crock of bull. There aren’t 30 some victims. I find people whine and complain about managers/bosses they don’t like all the time. That’s why he lasted as long as he did because some teachers are just plain disgruntled. No one publicly humiliated, harassed nor demoted the social studies teacher. She was bold and adult enough to send nude pics to her boss when he should have fired her for that yet instead she set him up and now decides to sue him because she is thousands of dollars in debt. I hope mcps puts policies in place to hold subordinates accountable for sexual harassment and indecent actions upon their bosses. These aren’t children. This is the workplace where EVERYONE KNOWS BETTER!

I had read there were around 30 anonymous complaints but for all I know it's the same person complaining 30 times.

The Washington Post reporters, the Jackson Lewis attorneys, and the OIG inspectors know a lot more than you do.

Then why do they refuse to share any credible evidence? All I'm getting here is gossip and conspiracy theories.

The only tangible allegations involved the teacher sending the nude photos. The rest seems vague.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about Morris? Is she still around or has she been bounced/resigned. Hell, did anyone get terminated?

I am unable to find anything other than she was placed on admin leave:

"The district also confirmed last week that Beidleman’s former supervisor, associate superintendent of schools and well-being Diane Morris, is on administrative leave with pay. Morris, the principal of Farquhar before Beidleman, managed Beidleman’s standard five-year evaluation during the 2022-2023 school year, according to a confidential internal school district document obtained by The Post."

And where is Eric Minus now?

"When parents complained about the assembly, then-Director of Schools

Ugh, I am so sorry for all the teachers of secondary schools in Baltimore:
Eric Minus
Executive Director, Secondary Schools

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a fun question: why isn’t Joel person number 1 and every number from there builds from there.

The randomness of this number just shows how MCPS was still trying to keep everything a secret

Probably because these people aren’t public figures. They are not politicians who signed up for their lives to displayed front and center to the public. Can you imagine what their families are going through. These people may have made mistakes and done wrong but they don’t deserve to be put on display for the public to ridicule and humiliate them. I’m sure quite a few members of the county council have secrets that they surely don’t want the public to know about.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a fun question: why isn’t Joel person number 1 and every number from there builds from there.

The randomness of this number just shows how MCPS was still trying to keep everything a secret

Probably because these people aren’t public figures. They are not politicians who signed up for their lives to displayed front and center to the public. Can you imagine what their families are going through. These people may have made mistakes and done wrong but they don’t deserve to be put on display for the public to ridicule and humiliate them. I’m sure quite a few members of the county council have secrets that they surely don’t want the public to know about.

Then resign. If you are covering up an abuser and actions that are going to cost Montgomery County taxpayers MILLIONS of MILLIONS. People's were largely impacted bc of their inability to do the right thing. They're county employees.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a fun question: why isn’t Joel person number 1 and every number from there builds from there.

The randomness of this number just shows how MCPS was still trying to keep everything a secret

Probably because these people aren’t public figures. They are not politicians who signed up for their lives to displayed front and center to the public. Can you imagine what their families are going through. These people may have made mistakes and done wrong but they don’t deserve to be put on display for the public to ridicule and humiliate them. I’m sure quite a few members of the county council have secrets that they surely don’t want the public to know about.

Then resign. If you are covering up an abuser and actions that are going to cost Montgomery County taxpayers MILLIONS of MILLIONS. People's were largely impacted bc of their inability to do the right thing. They're county employees.

County employees aren’t subject to public scrutiny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a fun question: why isn’t Joel person number 1 and every number from there builds from there.

The randomness of this number just shows how MCPS was still trying to keep everything a secret

Probably because these people aren’t public figures. They are not politicians who signed up for their lives to displayed front and center to the public. Can you imagine what their families are going through. These people may have made mistakes and done wrong but they don’t deserve to be put on display for the public to ridicule and humiliate them. I’m sure quite a few members of the county council have secrets that they surely don’t want the public to know about.

Then resign. If you are covering up an abuser and actions that are going to cost Montgomery County taxpayers MILLIONS of MILLIONS. People's were largely impacted bc of their inability to do the right thing. They're county employees.

County employees aren’t subject to public scrutiny.

Yes they are.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here’s a fun question: why isn’t Joel person number 1 and every number from there builds from there.

The randomness of this number just shows how MCPS was still trying to keep everything a secret

Probably because these people aren’t public figures. They are not politicians who signed up for their lives to displayed front and center to the public. Can you imagine what their families are going through. These people may have made mistakes and done wrong but they don’t deserve to be put on display for the public to ridicule and humiliate them. I’m sure quite a few members of the county council have secrets that they surely don’t want the public to know about.

Then resign. If you are covering up an abuser and actions that are going to cost Montgomery County taxpayers MILLIONS of MILLIONS. People's were largely impacted bc of their inability to do the right thing. They're county employees.

County employees aren’t subject to public scrutiny.

Yes they are.

It's stupid for anyone to say they aren't. Of course they are. Taxpayers pay their salary. Don't even waste time responding to that stupidity:

Interesting info in the the lawsuit filed suing Beidleman and MCPS

about employee #6:
“On February 3, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Complaint for Discrimination, Harassment and Workplace Bullying against Dr. Beidleman. Khalid Walker, an MCPS investigator, was assigned to investigate the complaint. Almost immediately, Mr. Walker began breaching the confidentiality protocols set forth on Policy ACI and Regulation ACH-RA by informing witnesses and those involved that the Plaintiff was the complaining witness.

“This breach by Walker was not an unintentional mistake. It was designed by the Defendant to ostracize the Plaintiff and put additional pressure on her to withdraw her Complaint. During this time, MCPS wanted to promote Dr. Beidleman to Principal of Paint Branch High School."

https://montgomeryperspective.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Doe-vs-MC-Board-of-Ed-and-Beidleman-Amended-Complaint.pdf