Jackson Lewis Report Who is Who?

[Anonymous]

Hyperbole mean exaggeration. The negative remarks about unsupported teachers are literal. Literal means not exagerated.

[Anonymous]

I don't understand the benefits of making teachers helpless without support or defense. The only people that I believe that it benefits are higher-ups who have cushy secure jobs as long as they can paint a rosy picture for the public. So they have an interest in blaming and unsupporting teachers. That way they can say the crime riddled school is the teachers fault but we cut them because we care about students. It's crazy!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They need to investigate the teachers that were pushed out during the principal coverups incidents.

Were any pushed out? Are there any facts to substantiate this gossip?

Absolutely! lol at the data to see whose allocations were reduced to surplus a teacher only to snap back to full time the following year. How many times did JB ignore emails and phone calls from other principals when good teachers were trying to apply out to better schools? How many teachers did he consider not qualified to be a content specialist only for them to get a position as the district wide content specialist?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They need to investigate the teachers that were pushed out during the principal coverups incidents.

Were any pushed out? Are there any facts to substantiate this gossip?

Absolutely! lol at the data to see whose allocations were reduced to surplus a teacher only to snap back to full time the following year. How many times did JB ignore emails and phone calls from other principals when good teachers were trying to apply out to better schools? How many teachers did he consider not qualified to be a content specialist only for them to get a position as the district wide content specialist?

None that have been documented.

[Anonymous]

There is actually lots of documentation and referrals in the computer but admin retaliates all the time because when you report it makes work for them. Reporting is frowned upon. It makes the schools look bad.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is actually lots of documentation and referrals in the computer but admin retaliates all the time because when you report it makes work for them. Reporting is frowned upon. It makes the schools look bad.

Do you have evidence to support this claim or just more supposition?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Hyperbole mean exaggeration. The negative remarks about unsupported teachers are literal. Literal means not exagerated.

Perhaps it is in an imaginary world, but let's stick with objective evidence, not the bogus anonymous complaints that can't be verified.

[Anonymous]

Sure look at the computers for reports, dates, times, resulted, etc. You might not be able to talk to the teachers though because they might have been cut because they reported incidents and then were not able to return as a teacher because they have a blabbering mouth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sure look at the computers for reports, dates, times, resulted, etc. You might not be able to talk to the teachers though because they might have been cut because they reported incidents and then were not able to return as a teacher because they have a blabbering mouth.

No such evidence was found. In fact, I read they found no wrongdoing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure look at the computers for reports, dates, times, resulted, etc. You might not be able to talk to the teachers though because they might have been cut because they reported incidents and then were not able to return as a teacher because they have a blabbering mouth.

No such evidence was found. In fact, I read they found no wrongdoing.

LOL
Joel, how is Mexico?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is actually lots of documentation and referrals in the computer but admin retaliates all the time because when you report it makes work for them. Reporting is frowned upon. It makes the schools look bad.

Do you have evidence to support this claim or just more supposition?

I know the people who were pushed out. I wouldn’t have a job if they hadn’t gotten pushed out. Then, I witnessed him do this to other teachers!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is actually lots of documentation and referrals in the computer but admin retaliates all the time because when you report it makes work for them. Reporting is frowned upon. It makes the schools look bad.

Do you have evidence to support this claim or just more supposition?

I know the people who were pushed out. I wouldn’t have a job if they hadn’t gotten pushed out. Then, I witnessed him do this to other teachers!

I'm also a teacher and don't know of any such cases. Your post carries about as much weight as the silly anonymous complaints.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is actually lots of documentation and referrals in the computer but admin retaliates all the time because when you report it makes work for them. Reporting is frowned upon. It makes the schools look bad.

Do you have evidence to support this claim or just more supposition?

I know the people who were pushed out. I wouldn’t have a job if they hadn’t gotten pushed out. Then, I witnessed him do this to other teachers!

I'm also a teacher and don't know of any such cases. Your post carries about as much weight as the silly anonymous complaints.

Joel, still think your behavior is allowed in a work place?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sure look at the computers for reports, dates, times, resulted, etc. You might not be able to talk to the teachers though because they might have been cut because they reported incidents and then were not able to return as a teacher because they have a blabbering mouth.

No such evidence was found. In fact, I read they found no wrongdoing.

The whole cases hinged on a bunch of "anonymous" complaints and a teacher who sexting him nude photos. He may be a horrible person, but the evidence seems thin at best. The whole thing seemed like a pretext for ditching McKngiht.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is actually lots of documentation and referrals in the computer but admin retaliates all the time because when you report it makes work for them. Reporting is frowned upon. It makes the schools look bad.

Do you have evidence to support this claim or just more supposition?

I know the people who were pushed out. I wouldn’t have a job if they hadn’t gotten pushed out. Then, I witnessed him do this to other teachers!

I'm also a teacher and don't know of any such cases. Your post carries about as much weight as the silly anonymous complaints.

So? Just because you don’t have job due to your predecessor getting surplussed at the whim of a toxic principal doesn’t mean my experience isn’t real! There are many Farquhar teachers that he pushed out including teacher leaders. Not my fault you want to ignore it and be part of the problem