Jackson Lewis Report Who is Who?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was this the original report that found no wrongdoing or one of the later ones they did to get their preferred narrative out?

Exactly! But I also enjoy all the juicy gossip and speculation in threads like these.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is employee 5? Sounds like the only one who questioned Jb getting promoted.

Maybe Dawson?

No way! It says Beidleman sent employee 5 flirtatious texts from 2020-2022 that she did not object to at the time.

[Anonymous]

5 is Diane Morris

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the council hearing yesterday, Kate Stewart asked them about the five people in the report who knew about the investigation but didn't do their due diligence re JB's promotion. They said of the five, three were no longer with MCPS and two were on administrative leave/still being investigated. The three no longer with MCPS must be McKnight, Murphy, and Simmons. One of the ones still on administrative leave is Morris. Who is the other?

Murphy is w Arlington public schools I believe now. So no consequences for him? Simmons avoided consequences too?

Murphy used to be superintendent of Arlington Public Schools. According to his Linked-in page, he is consulting:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/patrick-k-murphy-ed-d-1b5450a3?original_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F

[Anonymous]

13 is indisputably Donna Redmond Jones. The report talked about 13 being Joel’s potential supervisor at Paint Branch. DRJ oversaw that cluster before this blew up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the council hearing yesterday, Kate Stewart asked them about the five people in the report who knew about the investigation but didn't do their due diligence re JB's promotion. They said of the five, three were no longer with MCPS and two were on administrative leave/still being investigated. The three no longer with MCPS must be McKnight, Murphy, and Simmons. One of the ones still on administrative leave is Morris. Who is the other?

Murphy is w Arlington public schools I believe now. So no consequences for him? Simmons avoided consequences too?

It was Brian Stockton, McKnight's former chief of staff, who just returned to Arlington public schools.

Ok so Murphy was boss of morris, kimbell, Dawson, Jones, morris and sheron?

Murphy was Deputy Superintendent (now acting Collins) which is directly over 1) Chief of School Support and Wellbeing (Reuben, then acting Morris, then acting Kimball, now no one?); 2) Chief Academic Officer (Pugh); 3) Chief of Strategic Initiatives (Sheron), and 4) medical officer (Kapunan).

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/siteassets/district/globalcontent/mcps-organization-fy2020.pdf

Who was the acting he before key! I cannot find it!!!

Susan Marks was acting head of HR until Key was hired over the summer of '23

Thank you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:13 is indisputably Donna Redmond Jones. The report talked about 13 being Joel’s potential supervisor at Paint Branch. DRJ oversaw that cluster before this blew up.

Oh right right right! Thank you!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is employee 5? Sounds like the only one who questioned Jb getting promoted.

Maybe Dawson?

No way! It says Beidleman sent employee 5 flirtatious texts from 2020-2022 that she did not object to at the time.

Ewww! It’s all so incestuous. Why was employee 23 (ms) so reckless when it came to her career and covering up for 25???

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is employee 5? Sounds like the only one who questioned Jb getting promoted.

Maybe Dawson?

No way! It says Beidleman sent employee 5 flirtatious texts from 2020-2022 that she did not object to at the time.

Did I miss that in the report???!! Page #????? Thank you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:At the council hearing yesterday, Kate Stewart asked them about the five people in the report who knew about the investigation but didn't do their due diligence re JB's promotion. They said of the five, three were no longer with MCPS and two were on administrative leave/still being investigated. The three no longer with MCPS must be McKnight, Murphy, and Simmons. One of the ones still on administrative leave is Morris. Who is the other?

Murphy is w Arlington public schools I believe now. So no consequences for him? Simmons avoided consequences too?

It was Brian Stockton, McKnight's former chief of staff, who just returned to Arlington public schools.

Ok so Murphy was boss of morris, kimbell, Dawson, Jones, morris and sheron?

Murphy was Deputy Superintendent (now acting Collins) which is directly over 1) Chief of School Support and Wellbeing (Reuben, then acting Morris, then acting Kimball, now no one?); 2) Chief Academic Officer (Pugh); 3) Chief of Strategic Initiatives (Sheron), and 4) medical officer (Kapunan).

https://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/siteassets/district/globalcontent/mcps-organization-fy2020.pdf

Who was the acting he before key! I cannot find it!!!

Susan Marks was acting head of HR until Key was hired over the summer of '23

Thank you!

Ahhh that makes sense now bc the report indicates that person was new to that title. I don’t like they way she treated employee #6, if he’s telling the truth. I wonder if all of them were crapping themselves when they were made aware of the wapo article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is employee 5? Sounds like the only one who questioned Jb getting promoted.

Maybe Dawson?

No way! It says Beidleman sent employee 5 flirtatious texts from 2020-2022 that she did not object to at the time.

Did I miss that in the report???!! Page #????? Thank you!

Wasn't one of his accusers texting him nude photos?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is employee 5? Sounds like the only one who questioned Jb getting promoted.

Maybe Dawson?

No way! It says Beidleman sent employee 5 flirtatious texts from 2020-2022 that she did not object to at the time.

Did I miss that in the report???!! Page #????? Thank you!

Wasn't one of his accusers texting him nude photos?

Yes, but the other 30-some victims were not. Moreover, the fact that he engaged in a sexual relationship with an employee is a problem in and of itself. Finally, in 2024, we believe that women have the right to end a relationship without being publicly humiliated, harassed, and effectively demoted. No means no, even if someone said yes earlier. Please catch up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is employee 5? Sounds like the only one who questioned Jb getting promoted.

Maybe Dawson?

No way! It says Beidleman sent employee 5 flirtatious texts from 2020-2022 that she did not object to at the time.

Did I miss that in the report???!! Page #????? Thank you!

Wasn't one of his accusers texting him nude photos?

Yes, but the other 30-some victims were not. Moreover, the fact that he engaged in a sexual relationship with an employee is a problem in and of itself. Finally, in 2024, we believe that women have the right to end a relationship without being publicly humiliated, harassed, and effectively demoted. No means no, even if someone said yes earlier. Please catch up.

This is a crock of bull. There aren’t 30 some victims. I find people whine and complain about managers/bosses they don’t like all the time. That’s why he lasted as long as he did because some teachers are just plain disgruntled. No one publicly humiliated, harassed nor demoted the social studies teacher. She was bold and adult enough to send nude pics to her boss when he should have fired her for that yet instead she set him up and now decides to sue him because she is thousands of dollars in debt. I hope mcps puts policies in place to hold subordinates accountable for sexual harassment and indecent actions upon their bosses. These aren’t children. This is the workplace where EVERYONE KNOWS BETTER!

[Anonymous]

Just like employee #5 that received flirtatious text and did nothing about it. Because it was welcomed and acted upon. The culture of mcps leadership is disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who is employee 5? Sounds like the only one who questioned Jb getting promoted.

Maybe Dawson?

No way! It says Beidleman sent employee 5 flirtatious texts from 2020-2022 that she did not object to at the time.

Did I miss that in the report???!! Page #????? Thank you!

Wasn't one of his accusers texting him nude photos?

Yes, but the other 30-some victims were not. Moreover, the fact that he engaged in a sexual relationship with an employee is a problem in and of itself. Finally, in 2024, we believe that women have the right to end a relationship without being publicly humiliated, harassed, and effectively demoted. No means no, even if someone said yes earlier. Please catch up.

Yes, but the other 30 were unnamed and anonymous.