Winning independent suburban women

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What percentage of “Independent suburban women” rank abortion as their only voting criteria?

Single digits.

Compare that to jobs, schools, safety.

Republican governors sure seem to be doing a great job with crime

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_violent_crime_rate

As you point out, Republican-run states like Alaska, Tennessee, Arkansas, Missouri etc have some of the highest per-100k violent crime rates in the nation.

[Anonymous]

Independent suburban women are the swing voters who vote Democratic every time Republicans screw up the economy, but as soon as Democrats get things back to normal they vote Republican because they don’t want to pay taxes or help “other” people. It’s a 40+ year cycle.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We need video of you reading or singing a bedtime song to your kids. When was the last time you sang to someone, or to your own kids. If you're not a singer, you're a book reader.

The only Republican candidate with young kids is the Indian tech billionaire and he was nuts - claims climate change is a hoax for starters … he also has jo political
Experience yet knows everything … would
Take more than him reading engaging kids stories to make smart women vote for him …

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Women under 50 are getting out and voting for pro choice candidates and issues since the detestable Dobbs decision.

This is also driving the youth vote.

Wonder why? Anybody with two brain cells to rub together knows an ill-timed pregnancy is the road to ruin in this country.

Plenty of women over 50 are getting out and voting for pro choice candidates. Including plenty of independent suburban over 50 women.

[Anonymous]

Anyone who has been pregnant knows it can be very dangerous. No one wants compromised care.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anyone who has been pregnant knows it can be very dangerous. No one wants compromised care.

Also people concerned about pregnant loved ones. The forced birthers are a minority of voters in this country with good reason.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We need video of you reading or singing a bedtime song to your kids. When was the last time you sang to someone, or to your own kids. If you're not a singer, you're a book reader.

The only Republican candidate with young kids is the Indian tech billionaire and he was nuts - claims climate change is a hoax for starters … he also has jo political
Experience yet knows everything … would
Take more than him reading engaging kids stories to make smart women vote for him …

DeSantis also has young kids. He actually ran campaign ads reading books to them to suck up to Trump.

[Anonymous]

Real policy proposals. I don’t want to hear how you’ll make everything perfect (no one can), but I’m interested in thoughtful proposals. But I also want to know that you’re tough. It’s not enough to be smart. We are a global leader and our president needs to be able to execute on tough decisions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What percentage of “Independent suburban women” rank abortion as their only voting criteria?

Single digits.

Compare that to jobs, schools, safety.

“Exit polling from ABC News showed a plurality of Pennsylvania voters, 37%, chose abortion as the issue that mattered most to them as they cast their ballots. And those voters overwhelmingly supported Democrats.”
https://www.goerie.com/story/news/politics/2022/11/16/pennsylvania-women-helped-john-fetterman-josh-shapiro-win-midterm-elections-abortion/69648023007/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What percentage of “Independent suburban women” rank abortion as their only voting criteria?

Single digits.

Compare that to jobs, schools, safety.

“Exit polling from ABC News showed a plurality of Pennsylvania voters, 37%, chose abortion as the issue that mattered most to them as they cast their ballots. And those voters overwhelmingly supported Democrats.”
https://www.goerie.com/story/news/politics/2022/11/16/pennsylvania-women-helped-john-fetterman-josh-shapiro-win-midterm-elections-abortion/69648023007/

Yes. There are posters on here that seem to think if they say many times that abortion rights is not an important issue, that will make it true. They can not seem to understand the robust evidence right in front of us all that it is a very important issue that motivates voter turnout and drives votes.

If you want to win independent suburban women at the polls....take a pro choice position. Period.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. I have had exactly the number of abortions that I intended to have. I don't want to talk about them, see people having them, anything like that. I just want them to be available.

I have voted R in the past and may vote R in the future. Once this abortion issue is past. Every R candidate who swears fealty to banning abortion loses my vote and the large majority of American votes.

Do you believe there should be any limits on abortion? Even up to full-term? If so, where do you draw the line? Do you believe they should be unlimited? If not, what’s the limit?

DP. I don't believe there should be limits on abortion. "Full term abortions" is essentially a red herring. Women don't go through feeling their baby kick, watching them move, listening to their heartbeat for 32 weeks, and suddenly decide that they've changed their mind, and would like an abortion. There is almost always heartbreak involved in decisions to terminate/deliver early, either involving threat to a mother's life, or threat to the fetus. These are wanted pregnancies.

What does it say about a person that believes that women willy-nilly go about terminating pregnancies they have carried for 8 months?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. I have had exactly the number of abortions that I intended to have. I don't want to talk about them, see people having them, anything like that. I just want them to be available.

I have voted R in the past and may vote R in the future. Once this abortion issue is past. Every R candidate who swears fealty to banning abortion loses my vote and the large majority of American votes.

Do you believe there should be any limits on abortion? Even up to full-term? If so, where do you draw the line? Do you believe they should be unlimited? If not, what’s the limit?

DP. I don't believe there should be limits on abortion. "Full term abortions" is essentially a red herring. Women don't go through feeling their baby kick, watching them move, listening to their heartbeat for 32 weeks, and suddenly decide that they've changed their mind, and would like an abortion. There is almost always heartbreak involved in decisions to terminate/deliver early, either involving threat to a mother's life, or threat to the fetus. These are wanted pregnancies.

What does it say about a person that believes that women willy-nilly go about terminating pregnancies they have carried for 8 months?

It says they are ignorant. Probably willfully so at this point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What percentage of “Independent suburban women” rank abortion as their only voting criteria?

Single digits.

Compare that to jobs, schools, safety.

“Exit polling from ABC News showed a plurality of Pennsylvania voters, 37%, chose abortion as the issue that mattered most to them as they cast their ballots. And those voters overwhelmingly supported Democrats.”
https://www.goerie.com/story/news/politics/2022/11/16/pennsylvania-women-helped-john-fetterman-josh-shapiro-win-midterm-elections-abortion/69648023007/

Yes. There are posters on here that seem to think if they say many times that abortion rights is not an important issue, that will make it true. They can not seem to understand the robust evidence right in front of us all that it is a very important issue that motivates voter turnout and drives votes.

If you want to win independent suburban women at the polls....take a pro choice position. Period.

Clearly, we want the protections of Roe returned. Support that and get votes

[Anonymous]

What 2015 article?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. I have had exactly the number of abortions that I intended to have. I don't want to talk about them, see people having them, anything like that. I just want them to be available.

I have voted R in the past and may vote R in the future. Once this abortion issue is past. Every R candidate who swears fealty to banning abortion loses my vote and the large majority of American votes.

Do you believe there should be any limits on abortion? Even up to full-term? If so, where do you draw the line? Do you believe they should be unlimited? If not, what’s the limit?

DP. I don't believe there should be limits on abortion. "Full term abortions" is essentially a red herring. Women don't go through feeling their baby kick, watching them move, listening to their heartbeat for 32 weeks, and suddenly decide that they've changed their mind, and would like an abortion. There is almost always heartbreak involved in decisions to terminate/deliver early, either involving threat to a mother's life, or threat to the fetus. These are wanted pregnancies.

What does it say about a person that believes that women willy-nilly go about terminating pregnancies they have carried for 8 months?

Dp- it says this is not a politician that will ever get my vote.