Disturbing instance of anti-woke brainwashing

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if he were saying the same thing, but talking about, say, conservative parents and reversing the names of the politicians, you wouldn't bat an eye.

Also, super weird that you think a pizza guy shouldn't have political views that differ from a rich person.

Here’s the thing:
We don’t talk about or even think about “conservative parents” unless you’re doing batsh#t crazy things like trying to ban books or threatening our teachers or local school board. Like, you’re not a topic of conversation in our lives unless you’re getting up to some crazy-ass stuff. Going back to your point - I would definitely be weirded out if someone I knew said “Conservative parents must be destroyed and eliminated.” However, the more likely scenario is that such words would never be uttered because I surround myself with stable people.

This gets to the rub of the matter:
why does “Woke” - a fictional concept - live rent-free in conservatives’ heads?

I can't speak for conservatives because I am liberal. However, some of the craziest woke ideas are actually being implemented in progressive places such as NoVA and MoCo. Normal people of all political affiliations are fed up and they're starting to push back.

What are these woke ideas, exactly?

The worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school. Doing this in K-5 is OK, in middle school is less OK, in high school is completely insane and anti-science.

That’s not a woke idea. That’s the result of a SCOTUS decision penned by Justice Gorsuch before Biden was even elected.

Come on man. That wasn't a real case. "The Supreme Court’s brief order, which let stand an appeals court’s temporary injunction, gave no reasons, which is not unusual when the justices rule on emergency applications filed on what critics call the court’s shadow docket." We'll soon see a real case and the Supreme Court will prohibit males from playing girls' sports because this is what most sane people believe is fair. And you'll be right back here screeching about it and begging Biden to pack the court. So yes, allowing males to compete in girls' sports is woke, anti-science, and discriminatory against 50% of the population.

I’m talking about Bostock, which was a real case. The court did not grant cert to Virginia in the Grimm case.

I don’t give a damn about sports, and I never will, but let’s not pretend a bunch of libs voted for Gorsuch to make this happen, mmkay?

Come on man. That's not related to what I said, even a little. Bostock was about being fired for being gay. No one should be fired for being gay or trans. I said "the worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school." This is woke, insane, illiberal, and discriminatory to girls (the female kind) who play and DO care about sports.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The less-educated among us need to feel superior to someone. The Rs have convinced them that policies that would directly benefit them - affordable childcare, affordable health care, good schools that don't depend on your zip code, sensible gun control, fair treatment under the law, etc. - are "woke" ideas that are going to somehow unravel the fabric of society. Therefore men like this pizza delivery guy vote in favor of corporations and the wealthy and against their own best interests.

Frankly, these people are irredeemable, but they are nothing new. In centuries past, they would’ve been excommunicated and sent out to other countries or overseas colonies. But the world is too small for that now. A practical solution is simple eradication facilities where these people would be sent to where they would be humanely euthanized and their bodies rendered into useful substances and energy. And no, I’m not kidding. Not even a little bit. Most of these trumpers are fat. They could provide thousands of BTU’s of energy.

Conversely, the D's (and I am one) are expected to go around pretending we don't know what a woman is. We're not exactly a beacon of sanity right now. I don't blame anyone for voting red when the alternative we provide looks kind of nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if he were saying the same thing, but talking about, say, conservative parents and reversing the names of the politicians, you wouldn't bat an eye.

Also, super weird that you think a pizza guy shouldn't have political views that differ from a rich person.

Here’s the thing:
We don’t talk about or even think about “conservative parents” unless you’re doing batsh#t crazy things like trying to ban books or threatening our teachers or local school board. Like, you’re not a topic of conversation in our lives unless you’re getting up to some crazy-ass stuff. Going back to your point - I would definitely be weirded out if someone I knew said “Conservative parents must be destroyed and eliminated.” However, the more likely scenario is that such words would never be uttered because I surround myself with stable people.

This gets to the rub of the matter:
why does “Woke” - a fictional concept - live rent-free in conservatives’ heads?

I can't speak for conservatives because I am liberal. However, some of the craziest woke ideas are actually being implemented in progressive places such as NoVA and MoCo. Normal people of all political affiliations are fed up and they're starting to push back.

What are these woke ideas, exactly?

The worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school. Doing this in K-5 is OK, in middle school is less OK, in high school is completely insane and anti-science.

That’s not a woke idea. That’s the result of a SCOTUS decision penned by Justice Gorsuch before Biden was even elected.

Come on man. That wasn't a real case. "The Supreme Court’s brief order, which let stand an appeals court’s temporary injunction, gave no reasons, which is not unusual when the justices rule on emergency applications filed on what critics call the court’s shadow docket." We'll soon see a real case and the Supreme Court will prohibit males from playing girls' sports because this is what most sane people believe is fair. And you'll be right back here screeching about it and begging Biden to pack the court. So yes, allowing males to compete in girls' sports is woke, anti-science, and discriminatory against 50% of the population.

I’m talking about Bostock, which was a real case. The court did not grant cert to Virginia in the Grimm case.

I don’t give a damn about sports, and I never will, but let’s not pretend a bunch of libs voted for Gorsuch to make this happen, mmkay?

Come on man. That's not related to what I said, even a little. Bostock was about being fired for being gay. No one should be fired for being gay or trans. I said "the worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school." This is woke, insane, illiberal, and discriminatory to girls (the female kind) who play and DO care about sports.

Any law related to sex discrimination will have to fall in line with the Bostock and Grimm decisions, such as Title IX.

You can feel however you want to feel about it, but don’t blame liberal voters. Trump and McConnell are responsible for Gorsuch being on the court. This is the law of the land now. Deal with it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The less-educated among us need to feel superior to someone. The Rs have convinced them that policies that would directly benefit them - affordable childcare, affordable health care, good schools that don't depend on your zip code, sensible gun control, fair treatment under the law, etc. - are "woke" ideas that are going to somehow unravel the fabric of society. Therefore men like this pizza delivery guy vote in favor of corporations and the wealthy and against their own best interests.

Frankly, these people are irredeemable, but they are nothing new. In centuries past, they would’ve been excommunicated and sent out to other countries or overseas colonies. But the world is too small for that now. A practical solution is simple eradication facilities where these people would be sent to where they would be humanely euthanized and their bodies rendered into useful substances and energy. And no, I’m not kidding. Not even a little bit. Most of these trumpers are fat. They could provide thousands of BTU’s of energy.

You sound nice.
I hope your are not in any kind of public service occupation or in law.
More likely you are not employed at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The less-educated among us need to feel superior to someone. The Rs have convinced them that policies that would directly benefit them - affordable childcare, affordable health care, good schools that don't depend on your zip code, sensible gun control, fair treatment under the law, etc. - are "woke" ideas that are going to somehow unravel the fabric of society. Therefore men like this pizza delivery guy vote in favor of corporations and the wealthy and against their own best interests.

Frankly, these people are irredeemable, but they are nothing new. In centuries past, they would’ve been excommunicated and sent out to other countries or overseas colonies. But the world is too small for that now. A practical solution is simple eradication facilities where these people would be sent to where they would be humanely euthanized and their bodies rendered into useful substances and energy. And no, I’m not kidding. Not even a little bit. Most of these trumpers are fat. They could provide thousands of BTU’s of energy.

Yes, unfortunately there is really no place left on earth to relocate the woke population to, it would be a grand experiment to see what type of society they would create.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[img]

Anonymous wrote:Pizza guy frustrated to be living in a woke area. America is slowly slipping away. Most normal people are frustrated by that fact.

Slipping away from…..what?

Mental stability and common sense.

[Anonymous]

Gender confusion, psycho drugs, homosexuality, rapidly declining fertility rates.

Mother Nature is taking care of business. Mother Nature always wins in the end.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if he were saying the same thing, but talking about, say, conservative parents and reversing the names of the politicians, you wouldn't bat an eye.

Also, super weird that you think a pizza guy shouldn't have political views that differ from a rich person.

Here’s the thing:
We don’t talk about or even think about “conservative parents” unless you’re doing batsh#t crazy things like trying to ban books or threatening our teachers or local school board. Like, you’re not a topic of conversation in our lives unless you’re getting up to some crazy-ass stuff. Going back to your point - I would definitely be weirded out if someone I knew said “Conservative parents must be destroyed and eliminated.” However, the more likely scenario is that such words would never be uttered because I surround myself with stable people.

This gets to the rub of the matter:
why does “Woke” - a fictional concept - live rent-free in conservatives’ heads?

I can't speak for conservatives because I am liberal. However, some of the craziest woke ideas are actually being implemented in progressive places such as NoVA and MoCo. Normal people of all political affiliations are fed up and they're starting to push back.

What are these woke ideas, exactly?

The worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school. Doing this in K-5 is OK, in middle school is less OK, in high school is completely insane and anti-science.

That’s not a woke idea. That’s the result of a SCOTUS decision penned by Justice Gorsuch before Biden was even elected.

Come on man. That wasn't a real case. "The Supreme Court’s brief order, which let stand an appeals court’s temporary injunction, gave no reasons, which is not unusual when the justices rule on emergency applications filed on what critics call the court’s shadow docket." We'll soon see a real case and the Supreme Court will prohibit males from playing girls' sports because this is what most sane people believe is fair. And you'll be right back here screeching about it and begging Biden to pack the court. So yes, allowing males to compete in girls' sports is woke, anti-science, and discriminatory against 50% of the population.

I’m talking about Bostock, which was a real case. The court did not grant cert to Virginia in the Grimm case.

I don’t give a damn about sports, and I never will, but let’s not pretend a bunch of libs voted for Gorsuch to make this happen, mmkay?

Come on man. That's not related to what I said, even a little. Bostock was about being fired for being gay. No one should be fired for being gay or trans. I said "the worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school." This is woke, insane, illiberal, and discriminatory to girls (the female kind) who play and DO care about sports.

Trans athletes hasn't been a function of legislative, executive or judiciary politics, instead it's been the NCAA et cetera. Not saying I agree with it, but there's a lot of vague accusatory gesturing around at "they" (as in some grand liberal scheme) doing this, when most of us as voters, and most politicians haven't even remotely had a say in it. Frankly there's far too much of that vague accusatory gesturing going on of late.

There's also far too much misprioritization going on. As an example, while I agree that trans athletes in competitive sports is a problem, for me it ranks far far below kids getting shot in schools, educational achievement gaps, dropout rates, the seeming epidemic of ADHD and other childrens health issues, and a whole host of much more important issues affecting kids than the one-in-a-million chance of having a trans athlete compete against them, and it's frankly insulting and annoying as hell to continue having all of that shoved aside for this one dumb pet issue du jour of conservatives to completely take over and drown everything else out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if he were saying the same thing, but talking about, say, conservative parents and reversing the names of the politicians, you wouldn't bat an eye.

Also, super weird that you think a pizza guy shouldn't have political views that differ from a rich person.

Here’s the thing:
We don’t talk about or even think about “conservative parents” unless you’re doing batsh#t crazy things like trying to ban books or threatening our teachers or local school board. Like, you’re not a topic of conversation in our lives unless you’re getting up to some crazy-ass stuff. Going back to your point - I would definitely be weirded out if someone I knew said “Conservative parents must be destroyed and eliminated.” However, the more likely scenario is that such words would never be uttered because I surround myself with stable people.

This gets to the rub of the matter:
why does “Woke” - a fictional concept - live rent-free in conservatives’ heads?

I can't speak for conservatives because I am liberal. However, some of the craziest woke ideas are actually being implemented in progressive places such as NoVA and MoCo. Normal people of all political affiliations are fed up and they're starting to push back.

What are these woke ideas, exactly?

The worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school. Doing this in K-5 is OK, in middle school is less OK, in high school is completely insane and anti-science.

That’s not a woke idea. That’s the result of a SCOTUS decision penned by Justice Gorsuch before Biden was even elected.

Come on man. That wasn't a real case. "The Supreme Court’s brief order, which let stand an appeals court’s temporary injunction, gave no reasons, which is not unusual when the justices rule on emergency applications filed on what critics call the court’s shadow docket." We'll soon see a real case and the Supreme Court will prohibit males from playing girls' sports because this is what most sane people believe is fair. And you'll be right back here screeching about it and begging Biden to pack the court. So yes, allowing males to compete in girls' sports is woke, anti-science, and discriminatory against 50% of the population.

I’m talking about Bostock, which was a real case. The court did not grant cert to Virginia in the Grimm case.

I don’t give a damn about sports, and I never will, but let’s not pretend a bunch of libs voted for Gorsuch to make this happen, mmkay?

Come on man. That's not related to what I said, even a little. Bostock was about being fired for being gay. No one should be fired for being gay or trans. I said "the worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school." This is woke, insane, illiberal, and discriminatory to girls (the female kind) who play and DO care about sports.

Any law related to sex discrimination will have to fall in line with the Bostock and Grimm decisions, such as Title IX.

You can feel however you want to feel about it, but don’t blame liberal voters. Trump and McConnell are responsible for Gorsuch being on the court. This is the law of the land now. Deal with it.

If you’re a lawyer you’re a really bad one. It does not follow from those opinions that boys have to be allowed to join sports teams for girls. Also, even if you were right (which you are not), the liberal justices joined Gorsuch on this opinion, which was obviously decisive. There were conservative justices in descent. So if you want to allocate blame, more goes the liberals

[Anonymous]

/\ I meant: There were conservative justices in dissent

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The less-educated among us need to feel superior to someone. The Rs have convinced them that policies that would directly benefit them - affordable childcare, affordable health care, good schools that don't depend on your zip code, sensible gun control, fair treatment under the law, etc. - are "woke" ideas that are going to somehow unravel the fabric of society. Therefore men like this pizza delivery guy vote in favor of corporations and the wealthy and against their own best interests.

Frankly, these people are irredeemable, but they are nothing new. In centuries past, they would’ve been excommunicated and sent out to other countries or overseas colonies. But the world is too small for that now. A practical solution is simple eradication facilities where these people would be sent to where they would be humanely euthanized and their bodies rendered into useful substances and energy. And no, I’m not kidding. Not even a little bit. Most of these trumpers are fat. They could provide thousands of BTU’s of energy.

Cry harder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if he were saying the same thing, but talking about, say, conservative parents and reversing the names of the politicians, you wouldn't bat an eye.

Also, super weird that you think a pizza guy shouldn't have political views that differ from a rich person.

Here’s the thing:
We don’t talk about or even think about “conservative parents” unless you’re doing batsh#t crazy things like trying to ban books or threatening our teachers or local school board. Like, you’re not a topic of conversation in our lives unless you’re getting up to some crazy-ass stuff. Going back to your point - I would definitely be weirded out if someone I knew said “Conservative parents must be destroyed and eliminated.” However, the more likely scenario is that such words would never be uttered because I surround myself with stable people.

This gets to the rub of the matter:
why does “Woke” - a fictional concept - live rent-free in conservatives’ heads?

I can't speak for conservatives because I am liberal. However, some of the craziest woke ideas are actually being implemented in progressive places such as NoVA and MoCo. Normal people of all political affiliations are fed up and they're starting to push back.

What are these woke ideas, exactly?

The worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school. Doing this in K-5 is OK, in middle school is less OK, in high school is completely insane and anti-science.

That’s not a woke idea. That’s the result of a SCOTUS decision penned by Justice Gorsuch before Biden was even elected.

Come on man. That wasn't a real case. "The Supreme Court’s brief order, which let stand an appeals court’s temporary injunction, gave no reasons, which is not unusual when the justices rule on emergency applications filed on what critics call the court’s shadow docket." We'll soon see a real case and the Supreme Court will prohibit males from playing girls' sports because this is what most sane people believe is fair. And you'll be right back here screeching about it and begging Biden to pack the court. So yes, allowing males to compete in girls' sports is woke, anti-science, and discriminatory against 50% of the population.

I’m talking about Bostock, which was a real case. The court did not grant cert to Virginia in the Grimm case.

I don’t give a damn about sports, and I never will, but let’s not pretend a bunch of libs voted for Gorsuch to make this happen, mmkay?

Come on man. That's not related to what I said, even a little. Bostock was about being fired for being gay. No one should be fired for being gay or trans. I said "the worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school." This is woke, insane, illiberal, and discriminatory to girls (the female kind) who play and DO care about sports.

Any law related to sex discrimination will have to fall in line with the Bostock and Grimm decisions, such as Title IX.

You can feel however you want to feel about it, but don’t blame liberal voters. Trump and McConnell are responsible for Gorsuch being on the court. This is the law of the land now. Deal with it.

If you’re a lawyer you’re a really bad one. It does not follow from those opinions that boys have to be allowed to join sports teams for girls. Also, even if you were right (which you are not), the liberal justices joined Gorsuch on this opinion, which was obviously decisive. There were conservative justices in descent. So if you want to allocate blame, more goes the liberals

Give it a goog

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if he were saying the same thing, but talking about, say, conservative parents and reversing the names of the politicians, you wouldn't bat an eye.

Also, super weird that you think a pizza guy shouldn't have political views that differ from a rich person.

Here’s the thing:
We don’t talk about or even think about “conservative parents” unless you’re doing batsh#t crazy things like trying to ban books or threatening our teachers or local school board. Like, you’re not a topic of conversation in our lives unless you’re getting up to some crazy-ass stuff. Going back to your point - I would definitely be weirded out if someone I knew said “Conservative parents must be destroyed and eliminated.” However, the more likely scenario is that such words would never be uttered because I surround myself with stable people.

This gets to the rub of the matter:
why does “Woke” - a fictional concept - live rent-free in conservatives’ heads?

I can't speak for conservatives because I am liberal. However, some of the craziest woke ideas are actually being implemented in progressive places such as NoVA and MoCo. Normal people of all political affiliations are fed up and they're starting to push back.

What are these woke ideas, exactly?

The worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school. Doing this in K-5 is OK, in middle school is less OK, in high school is completely insane and anti-science.

That’s not a woke idea. That’s the result of a SCOTUS decision penned by Justice Gorsuch before Biden was even elected.

Come on man. That wasn't a real case. "The Supreme Court’s brief order, which let stand an appeals court’s temporary injunction, gave no reasons, which is not unusual when the justices rule on emergency applications filed on what critics call the court’s shadow docket." We'll soon see a real case and the Supreme Court will prohibit males from playing girls' sports because this is what most sane people believe is fair. And you'll be right back here screeching about it and begging Biden to pack the court. So yes, allowing males to compete in girls' sports is woke, anti-science, and discriminatory against 50% of the population.

I’m talking about Bostock, which was a real case. The court did not grant cert to Virginia in the Grimm case.

I don’t give a damn about sports, and I never will, but let’s not pretend a bunch of libs voted for Gorsuch to make this happen, mmkay?

Come on man. That's not related to what I said, even a little. Bostock was about being fired for being gay. No one should be fired for being gay or trans. I said "the worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school." This is woke, insane, illiberal, and discriminatory to girls (the female kind) who play and DO care about sports.

Trans athletes hasn't been a function of legislative, executive or judiciary politics, instead it's been the NCAA et cetera. Not saying I agree with it, but there's a lot of vague accusatory gesturing around at "they" (as in some grand liberal scheme) doing this, when most of us as voters, and most politicians haven't even remotely had a say in it. Frankly there's far too much of that vague accusatory gesturing going on of late.

There's also far too much misprioritization going on. As an example, while I agree that trans athletes in competitive sports is a problem, for me it ranks far far below kids getting shot in schools, educational achievement gaps, dropout rates, the seeming epidemic of ADHD and other childrens health issues, and a whole host of much more important issues affecting kids than the one-in-a-million chance of having a trans athlete compete against them, and it's frankly insulting and annoying as hell to continue having all of that shoved aside for this one dumb pet issue du jour of conservatives to completely take over and drown everything else out.

Yesterday, in a conversation with a friend, he argued the same point you just did. So I'll give you the same answer I gave him. We are capable of doing more than one thing at a time. If school districts like MoCo can go out of their way to develop a trans policy that allows males to compete in girls' sports and used their bathrooms and locker rooms based on nothing but their feelings, we can take the time to debate these issues properly using science instead of ideology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:OP, if he were saying the same thing, but talking about, say, conservative parents and reversing the names of the politicians, you wouldn't bat an eye.

Also, super weird that you think a pizza guy shouldn't have political views that differ from a rich person.

Here’s the thing:
We don’t talk about or even think about “conservative parents” unless you’re doing batsh#t crazy things like trying to ban books or threatening our teachers or local school board. Like, you’re not a topic of conversation in our lives unless you’re getting up to some crazy-ass stuff. Going back to your point - I would definitely be weirded out if someone I knew said “Conservative parents must be destroyed and eliminated.” However, the more likely scenario is that such words would never be uttered because I surround myself with stable people.

This gets to the rub of the matter:
why does “Woke” - a fictional concept - live rent-free in conservatives’ heads?

I can't speak for conservatives because I am liberal. However, some of the craziest woke ideas are actually being implemented in progressive places such as NoVA and MoCo. Normal people of all political affiliations are fed up and they're starting to push back.

What are these woke ideas, exactly?

The worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school. Doing this in K-5 is OK, in middle school is less OK, in high school is completely insane and anti-science.

That’s not a woke idea. That’s the result of a SCOTUS decision penned by Justice Gorsuch before Biden was even elected.

Come on man. That wasn't a real case. "The Supreme Court’s brief order, which let stand an appeals court’s temporary injunction, gave no reasons, which is not unusual when the justices rule on emergency applications filed on what critics call the court’s shadow docket." We'll soon see a real case and the Supreme Court will prohibit males from playing girls' sports because this is what most sane people believe is fair. And you'll be right back here screeching about it and begging Biden to pack the court. So yes, allowing males to compete in girls' sports is woke, anti-science, and discriminatory against 50% of the population.

I’m talking about Bostock, which was a real case. The court did not grant cert to Virginia in the Grimm case.

I don’t give a damn about sports, and I never will, but let’s not pretend a bunch of libs voted for Gorsuch to make this happen, mmkay?

Come on man. That's not related to what I said, even a little. Bostock was about being fired for being gay. No one should be fired for being gay or trans. I said "the worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school." This is woke, insane, illiberal, and discriminatory to girls (the female kind) who play and DO care about sports.

Any law related to sex discrimination will have to fall in line with the Bostock and Grimm decisions, such as Title IX.

You can feel however you want to feel about it, but don’t blame liberal voters. Trump and McConnell are responsible for Gorsuch being on the court. This is the law of the land now. Deal with it.

If you’re a lawyer you’re a really bad one. It does not follow from those opinions that boys have to be allowed to join sports teams for girls. Also, even if you were right (which you are not), the liberal justices joined Gorsuch on this opinion, which was obviously decisive. There were conservative justices in descent. So if you want to allocate blame, more goes the liberals

Give it a goog

I just dug through both decisions and read a few articles on it but couldn't find anything connecting either case to K-12 trans athletes playing girls' sports. Can you point me in the right direction...a quote or a link?

[Anonymous]

I’m
Sure the guy was white. It’s mostly white men who are afraid of “woke” not that they even know what it is. This is their way of being racist, homophobic and misogynistic without coming right out and saying it.