| I am probably what that guy would label as “woke” but I honestly don’t understand the OP’s point. Some guy is spouting off to his friends about whatever. Provided he is not planning to do violence to anyone, this is totally fine. Do I wish we didn’t have so many people opposed to making sure every American is treated fairly and kindly? Sure. But they entitled to their views. Hopefully in a couple of years they’ll find something else to obsess over. Ideally something harmless but useful like the location of best pizza on the east coast. |
People can generally (though not always) recognize someone of Latin American descent. Anyway my response actually said “Latino or otherwise non-white.” |
Even if they disagree with you, OP!!! |
Assuming you're actually asking and not feigning ignorance to push a disingenuous narrative, progressives pushed "being woke" meaning being aware of how discrimination and racism pervades our society both on a macro level but also on smaller levels many privileged people aren't even aware of. That's what real "woke" means, simply understanding the deck is stacked against POC and it's insidious and intentional. Conservative "woke," while sharing the same word, does not mean this. In fact it doesn't mean anything and it means whatever the person using it wants you to think it means. This usurping of the word was intentional, to steal it from people who actually want to use it to make the world a better place and hijack it to sow discord. There is a less insidious example you are probably aware of; "hipster." It originally meant a very specific kind of young person who wore ironic thrift store clothing and listened to bands you've never heard of and stopped listening to them once you had. The word was hijacked and now "hipster" just means any young person who dresses or acts differently from whoever is using the word. This is not a complicated concept. It has been happening to many different words for many generations. "Beatnik" was the same way. Reasonably intelligent people can easily tell the difference between the original use of the word and the insidious use of the word. If reasonably intelligent people can do it, why can't you? |
DP. That’s all fine and good but I hardly think the way the right uses “woke” is insidious. The same thing happened with “political correctness,” which wasn’t originally a term of mockery but came to be one. “Woke” is just a catchall for left-wing identity politics moving beyond racial now to include sex/gender politics. How is it unfair to use the term “woke” this way? |
| Pizza guy frustrated to be living in a woke area. America is slowly slipping away. Most normal people are frustrated by that fact. |
[img]
Slipping away from…..what? |
+100 Report any troll who makes these garbage claims. Probably the same nut doing it on multiple threads. |
DP. Do you even hear yourself? You sound absolutely insane. NO ONE on the court is taking bribes, and NO ONE on the court is a "rapist or sexual abuser," you utter imbecile. Talk about radicalized. You are so far gone it's embarrassing. |
The worst is allowing males to play girls' sports in school. Doing this in K-5 is OK, in middle school is less OK, in high school is completely insane and anti-science. |
|
Because it has an actual meaning and the right is deliberately perverting that meaning specifically to reduce the original meaning. If it was an organic progression where liberals used woke to refer to more and more things, diluting the meaning that would be one thing, but that's not what happened. The right deliberately said "let's use this for everything so nobody knows what woke means and nothing will be woke." That's basically the dictionary definition of insidious and unfair. |
Or it could be a hard working guy who is also in college but working part-time so as to pay his tuition/expenses and not expect a free ride from other taxpayers. |
Sure, those pubes just magically appeared on the diet coke can, and all those credible accusations that were never investigated by the FBI must have just been made up. And that private jet to Alaska paid for by the person involved in a Supreme Court case had nothing to do with the decision. Imagine being this willfully ignorant. |
An economically and morally strong constitutional republic. |