I want a candidate who is 100% pro-choice BUT pretty anti-immigration & socially conservative

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does socially conservative mean if not anti-abortion?

Not op but — I’m 100% pro choice but anti thots

Hookup culture is gross

Tattoos are gross and should be taxed

Onlyfans and porn is gross

Broken families are terrible

Too many bastards are being born

OP here and I agree

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does socially conservative mean if not anti-abortion?

Not op but — I’m 100% pro choice but anti thots

Hookup culture is gross

Tattoos are gross and should be taxed

Onlyfans and porn is gross

Broken families are terrible

Too many bastards are being born

None of that is legislatable, nor should it be, so why would a candidate's personal views on these matter? Also, your last point is gross. Those kids aren't "bastards," they are PEOPLE.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does socially conservative mean if not anti-abortion?

Not op but — I’m 100% pro choice but anti thots

Hookup culture is gross

Tattoos are gross and should be taxed

Onlyfans and porn is gross

Broken families are terrible

Too many bastards are being born

None of that is legislatable, nor should it be, so why would a candidate's personal views on these matter? Also, your last point is gross. Those kids aren't "bastards," they are PEOPLE.

“Bastards” commit an outsized amount of crime & have generally terrible life outcomes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does socially conservative mean if not anti-abortion?

Not op but — I’m 100% pro choice but anti thots

Hookup culture is gross

Tattoos are gross and should be taxed

Onlyfans and porn is gross

Broken families are terrible

Too many bastards are being born

None of that is legislatable, nor should it be, so why would a candidate's personal views on these matter? Also, your last point is gross. Those kids aren't "bastards," they are PEOPLE.

Of course it is. Take the opportunity to incentivize it by looking at current tax & welfare policy.

[Anonymous]

Why would anyone want church in government? Theocracies are up there with fascism and communism as far as worst types of government with worst human rights situations. Try Iran or Saudi Arabia they might be right up your alley.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does socially conservative mean if not anti-abortion?

Not op but — I’m 100% pro choice but anti thots

Hookup culture is gross

Tattoos are gross and should be taxed

Onlyfans and porn is gross

Broken families are terrible

Too many bastards are being born

None of that is legislatable, nor should it be, so why would a candidate's personal views on these matter? Also, your last point is gross. Those kids aren't "bastards," they are PEOPLE.

Singapore seems to deal with deviancy quite well

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does socially conservative mean if not anti-abortion?

Not op but — I’m 100% pro choice but anti thots

Hookup culture is gross

Tattoos are gross and should be taxed

Onlyfans and porn is gross

Broken families are terrible

Too many bastards are being born

None of that is legislatable, nor should it be, so why would a candidate's personal views on these matter? Also, your last point is gross. Those kids aren't "bastards," they are PEOPLE.

Singapore seems to deal with deviancy quite well

Yes indeed

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What does socially conservative mean if not anti-abortion?

Not op but — I’m 100% pro choice but anti thots

Hookup culture is gross

Tattoos are gross and should be taxed

Onlyfans and porn is gross

Broken families are terrible

Too many bastards are being born

None of that is legislatable, nor should it be, so why would a candidate's personal views on these matter? Also, your last point is gross. Those kids aren't "bastards," they are PEOPLE.

Thots are people too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.

Yes, I have no issue with that. I stand by it-- Bill Clinton is ideal.

Whatever you want to label yourself is fine. You vote for a democrat on election day so good. Call yourself a republican or whatever you want as long as you vote pro choice.

NP - so strange. This is why person holing people based on a single issue is stupid. It’s been to Dems detriment.

Detriment? You are not paying attention. This issue is bringing out voters and driving election outcomes. Is it just men and clueless women on this thread? Get it through your thick skills...forced birth policies are a huge deal and are not going to be tolerated. That's it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.

Yes, I have no issue with that. I stand by it-- Bill Clinton is ideal.

Whatever you want to label yourself is fine. You vote for a democrat on election day so good. Call yourself a republican or whatever you want as long as you vote pro choice.

I'm confused why you are weighing in on what I label myself. You would not find me to be pro-choice (nor would 1990s Bill Clinton be pro-choice) by today's standards because I believe abortion should have some restrictions. Obama would also be too conservative for today's left.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.

Yes, I have no issue with that. I stand by it-- Bill Clinton is ideal.

Whatever you want to label yourself is fine. You vote for a democrat on election day so good. Call yourself a republican or whatever you want as long as you vote pro choice.

I'm confused why you are weighing in on what I label myself. You would not find me to be pro-choice (nor would 1990s Bill Clinton be pro-choice) by today's standards because I believe abortion should have some restrictions. Obama would also be too conservative for today's left.

1990s bill Clinton was pro choice. Republicans are 100 percent responsible for overturning Roe which was an outrage and the voters are responding.

Call yourself whatever you want but if you voted for republican candidates you voted for overturning roe with very very few exceptions.

[Anonymous]

Children born of single parents in China can’t get health insurance. This is known. Thus, single parenthood is nonexistent!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.

Yes, I have no issue with that. I stand by it-- Bill Clinton is ideal.

Whatever you want to label yourself is fine. You vote for a democrat on election day so good. Call yourself a republican or whatever you want as long as you vote pro choice.

I'm confused why you are weighing in on what I label myself. You would not find me to be pro-choice (nor would 1990s Bill Clinton be pro-choice) by today's standards because I believe abortion should have some restrictions. Obama would also be too conservative for today's left.

Obviously you are a republican because you’ve trotted out the old canard that Democrats don’t want any restrictions on abortion never mind that RvW restricted after point of viability and no Democrat was fighting to push for “abortion” unill birth.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a moderate Republican, I agree with you OP.

How do you define being a 'moderate republican"?

Larry Hogan is the classic moderate republican; and amazingly, he is loved by just about everyone in Maryland, which is a solid democratic state. The only people who didn't like him were the uber-leftist local politicians of MoCo.

And me! Not a politician. Didn’t like his conservative politics. Hated his policy on starting school after Labor Day.

Obviously he was not as horrid as MAGA politicians. But that’s a low bar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Children born of single parents in China can’t get health insurance. This is known. Thus, single parenthood is nonexistent!

Rebublicans want to screw over our future generations by turning back the clock on their god given rights. That is going on right now in America so china will have to handle its own effed up reproductive rights situation for the time being.