I want a candidate who is 100% pro-choice BUT pretty anti-immigration & socially conservative

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you against immigration? This country was founded on immigration. This country thrives on immigration. Immigrants not only get the job done, they revitalize the economy. That is a fact.

Show me a thriving, healthy, ethnically diverse community.

WTF? Have you never heard of NYC?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.

DP. That's why I would consider Bill Clinton an ideal candidate. I'm also a Republican and I'm pro-choice, as well as all the other things PP listed.

[Anonymous]

As a moderate Republican, I agree with you OP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.

DP. That's why I would consider Bill Clinton an ideal candidate. I'm also a Republican and I'm pro-choice, as well as all the other things PP listed.

Ok. You're a republican that supports democratic candidates. Whatever you want to call yourself I guess.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nope.

Your options are pro-life/Christian Nationalism, or else democrats.

Nope. The options are fascist, speech-policing imbeciles, or else Republicans.
DP

So no choice at all, is what you are saying.

Democrats certainly don't offer a "choice" when it comes to speaking and opinions. There is only your way, or the highway. I'll take the highway, thanks.

Because the GOP is so very open to diverse opinions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.

Yes, I have no issue with that. I stand by it-- Bill Clinton is ideal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you against immigration? This country was founded on immigration. This country thrives on immigration. Immigrants not only get the job done, they revitalize the economy. That is a fact.

Nope. This country was founded on invasion and occupation.

The current politics is to invade other countries, then let their residents in as refugees who harbor an animus towards this country.

Really? State the policy name and where we can go read it. Thanks. Also which country is sending us refugees who harbor animus toward us? If you're talking about Iraq and Afghanistan, then all I can say is you don't know many Iraqis and Afghans.

There is a recent thread on this forum where people describe how Iraqis hate America, even more than Saddam Hussein.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.

Yes, I have no issue with that. I stand by it-- Bill Clinton is ideal.

Whatever you want to label yourself is fine. You vote for a democrat on election day so good. Call yourself a republican or whatever you want as long as you vote pro choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why are you against immigration? This country was founded on immigration. This country thrives on immigration. Immigrants not only get the job done, they revitalize the economy. That is a fact.

This country was not "founded" on immigration. Where do you get that from?

Where do you think the Founders came from, exactly?

Nearly all of them were born in America. So?

And where’d their parents come from?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Sorry but Clinton and Obama were pro choice.

Yes, I have no issue with that. I stand by it-- Bill Clinton is ideal.

Whatever you want to label yourself is fine. You vote for a democrat on election day so good. Call yourself a republican or whatever you want as long as you vote pro choice.

NP - so strange. This is why person holing people based on a single issue is stupid. It’s been to Dems detriment.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What does socially conservative mean if not anti-abortion?

Not op but — I’m 100% pro choice but anti thots

Hookup culture is gross

Tattoos are gross and should be taxed

Onlyfans and porn is gross

Broken families are terrible

Too many bastards are being born

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Joe Biden pretty much fits your description OP. It's one reason he won.

He’s been coopted by trans supremacists

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As a moderate Republican, I agree with you OP.

How do you define being a 'moderate republican"?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a Republican and consider Bill Clinton nearly ideal as a political candidate. Super pro-America, pro-police, tough on crime, strong border control, cut the deficit, oversaw massive economic expansion-- I could go on. He would be republican by today's standards. Obama Term 1 was also a fantastic, modern-conservative president.

Agreed. I'm an Independent and in some ways, one would think I'm conservative because of all these things; pro-police, strong border control, thinks trans women have no place in women's sports.. However, I am pro-choice and very much pro-gun control. I feel like I don't have a home in either party.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a moderate Republican, I agree with you OP.

How do you define being a 'moderate republican"?

Larry Hogan is the classic moderate republican; and amazingly, he is loved by just about everyone in Maryland, which is a solid democratic state. The only people who didn't like him were the uber-leftist local politicians of MoCo.