Why do men only date women they’re attracted to?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Women are superficial too. Look at all the women with height requirements

I'd argue that women are even more superficial in that sense. At least 50% of women would tell you they want a 6 foot tall man. How many men are that tall? 10%? There is little one can do about height.

Men on the other hand can take a second look at a woman who has lost weight, fixed her hair and sometimes it's as easy changing her clothes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are superficial too. Look at all the women with height requirements

I'd argue that women are even more superficial in that sense. At least 50% of women would tell you they want a 6 foot tall man. How many men are that tall? 10%? There is little one can do about height.

Men on the other hand can take a second look at a woman who has lost weight, fixed her hair and sometimes it's as easy changing her clothes.

And I’d say even if women are willing to compromise some on height, many women will never date a man who is 5’7” and under

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are superficial too. Look at all the women with height requirements

I'd argue that women are even more superficial in that sense. At least 50% of women would tell you they want a 6 foot tall man. How many men are that tall? 10%? There is little one can do about height.

Men on the other hand can take a second look at a woman who has lost weight, fixed her hair and sometimes it's as easy changing her clothes.

And I’d say even if women are willing to compromise some on height, many women will never date a man who is 5’7” and under

A lot of women wouldn’t date a man under 5’8”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm a woman and have never dated someone I'm not attracted to. What would be the point? Attraction is a necessary part of a relationship

I have. I even married him. Stupidly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are superficial too. Look at all the women with height requirements

I'd argue that women are even more superficial in that sense. At least 50% of women would tell you they want a 6 foot tall man. How many men are that tall? 10%? There is little one can do about height.

Men on the other hand can take a second look at a woman who has lost weight, fixed her hair and sometimes it's as easy changing her clothes.

Oh come on, they won't compromise on age just like those women won't compromise on height. And its' more than 50% of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are superficial too. Look at all the women with height requirements

I'd argue that women are even more superficial in that sense. At least 50% of women would tell you they want a 6 foot tall man. How many men are that tall? 10%? There is little one can do about height.

Men on the other hand can take a second look at a woman who has lost weight, fixed her hair and sometimes it's as easy changing her clothes.

And I’d say even if women are willing to compromise some on height, many women will never date a man who is 5’7” and under

As a woman I would say that this is not because of not being attracted to the man it's because of not wanting sons to have to deal with being short men.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Men are visual, women will learn to like wealthy nice men

There are only so many wealthy men. Not many.

The average woman is not getting a wealthy man. And the average man is not getting an above average woman.

The average man is getting the best he can get. And the best he can get is average because the handsome and wealthy men already got the above average women.

The average man is actually getting a below average woman. Otherwise the numbers don't add up. There are only so many above average women to go around.

Right logic but you have it backwards.

[Anonymous]

All you women saying you would never go out with someone you weren’t attracted to are full of it. If some 5’7” 200-pound schlub asked you out – and you knew he had $50 million – you would be batting your eyelashes and twirling your hair like you were in middle school again.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All you women saying you would never go out with someone you weren’t attracted to are full of it. If some 5’7” 200-pound schlub asked you out – and you knew he had $50 million – you would be batting your eyelashes and twirling your hair like you were in middle school again.

I personally stopped dating a now-billionaire and the only son of one bc we were not compatible; one was sexually weird and the other had fidelity issues. One was over 6 feet and the other was about five nine and both are IMO good looking. Don’t be bitter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All you women saying you would never go out with someone you weren’t attracted to are full of it. If some 5’7” 200-pound schlub asked you out – and you knew he had $50 million – you would be batting your eyelashes and twirling your hair like you were in middle school again.

5 foot 8 woman here.

A 5 foot 7 man would have to be perfect: Handsome, kind. Sweet, lean, neat etc.

A 6'3 man could be missing an arm and a leg, and have one eye. and I would pick him first.

[Anonymous]

not wanting sons to have to deal with being short men.

Oh God, you get a kid with 2 arms and 2 legs, and grows up sorta happy, thank your lucky stars.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:All you women saying you would never go out with someone you weren’t attracted to are full of it. If some 5’7” 200-pound schlub asked you out – and you knew he had $50 million – you would be batting your eyelashes and twirling your hair like you were in middle school again.

Dude any man walking into a relationship with $50M is going to require the worlds tightest prenup anyway.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

not wanting sons to have to deal with being short men.

Oh God, you get a kid with 2 arms and 2 legs, and grows up sorta happy, thank your lucky stars.

I agree but young women do think this way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All you women saying you would never go out with someone you weren’t attracted to are full of it. If some 5’7” 200-pound schlub asked you out – and you knew he had $50 million – you would be batting your eyelashes and twirling your hair like you were in middle school again.

5 foot 8 woman here.

A 5 foot 7 man would have to be perfect: Handsome, kind. Sweet, lean, neat etc.

A 6'3 man could be missing an arm and a leg, and have one eye. and I would pick him first.

Quite happy to be a 6’3” man with both arms and legs and two good eyes. The dating pool is terrific. Seriously.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are superficial too. Look at all the women with height requirements

I'd argue that women are even more superficial in that sense. At least 50% of women would tell you they want a 6 foot tall man. How many men are that tall? 10%? There is little one can do about height.

Men on the other hand can take a second look at a woman who has lost weight, fixed her hair and sometimes it's as easy changing her clothes.

And I’d say even if women are willing to compromise some on height, many women will never date a man who is 5’7” and under

As a woman I would say that this is not because of not being attracted to the man it's because of not wanting sons to have to deal with being short men.

I don't want short daughters either. Being tall is part of my identity.

I mean, if it happened, of course I would love my children and think they are beautiful no matter what they looked like. But I am not increasing the chances that they are short.