Why do Atheists care? Here is one scary reason:

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Christian Democrats and lots of Republican Christians and other religious are against that too, OP. Atheists don't hold a monopoly on fighting to maintain the separation of church and state.


That's true. And Christians don't believe in any supernatural phenomena other than their own. But they do believe in their own, and that is a political problem, and a problem for the rest of us who do not believe in it.

I just think we'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs.


Lenin, Stalin and Mao agree.

Seriously, though, hyperbole like your OP just makes the people you’re concerned about harden their positions. I say this as someone who’s appalled by Trump’s Supreme Court nominees and the end of Roe v. Wade. Instead give a thought to psychology and ease up on the hyperbole.



Lenin, Stalin and Mao? Who is dealing in hyperbole and propaganda now?

Check my bolded parts in the statement "we'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs."

I believe people are capable of this type of growth, and the fact that non-belief is the fastest growing segment by a multiple supports that belief. They just need to know it is OK with society for them to follow the logic to that position.


I’m in awe of your arrogance. I’m a faithful person and I am quite aware that I contribute to making this country “better, stronger, and smarter” in my role as a high school teacher. Yes, I believe in God. I believe it takes courage and conviction to have faith in the unseen. I don’t push my beliefs on others, though.

The fact you are? I wonder which of us is more dangerous.


Sorry, but my post was not about you, or any individual.

"We'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs"

If you teach high school - a worthy and contributory endeavor, thank you - then you certainly can understand the difference.

ps no need to ad hominem along with your point, I did not respond in kind on purpose.


Yet you are speaking directly to me if you want people to “voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord” give up beliefs. I have beliefs, strongly held ones that direct my sense of morality and the direction of my endeavors. They are most definitely rooted in faith. If I follow your argument from previous threads (and I assume they are yours considering the similar words), you desire a country in which we no longer participate in various religions. You say you are not speaking to any one individual, but aren’t you calling for people (individuals) to “grow” into non-belief? Am I reading your posts wrong?

Yes, I find this type of thinking arrogant. It assumes that my path is inherently wrong and that I must “grow” into something that I find contrary to my values.

I wouldn’t presume to tell you to adopt my beliefs, nor would I suggest you need to grow out of yours.


No, I am definitely NOT speaking directly to you. I don't know you. I have no idea what you believe and also didn't ask you to change. I didn't ask you to adopt my beliefs. I said, again:

We'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs

I see supernatural beliefs rapidly disappearing in the US as all the polls show, and I see a lot of harm being done in their name. So I think we'll all be better off when that is finally over, although it will likely not be in my lifetime. I think when people really evaluate the supernatural, and the lack of evidence for it, they will voluntarily abandon it, especially if societal pressures don't inhibit that. But I DON'T think people should be made to do it, and I certainly don't think I will change your mind here in this anonymous forum.

You are taking this very personally, and I wonder why? I do not want to speculate so maybe you can explain?

If you'd like to sincerely and rationally discuss your specific beliefs, I am pleased to do that - in fact I welcome it - but my intention was not to debate individuals about what they believe in this thread, so I will leave that up to you.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Christian Democrats and lots of Republican Christians and other religious are against that too, OP. Atheists don't hold a monopoly on fighting to maintain the separation of church and state.


That's true. And Christians don't believe in any supernatural phenomena other than their own. But they do believe in their own, and that is a political problem, and a problem for the rest of us who do not believe in it.

I just think we'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs.


Lenin, Stalin and Mao agree.

Seriously, though, hyperbole like your OP just makes the people you’re concerned about harden their positions. I say this as someone who’s appalled by Trump’s Supreme Court nominees and the end of Roe v. Wade. Instead give a thought to psychology and ease up on the hyperbole.



Lenin, Stalin and Mao? Who is dealing in hyperbole and propaganda now?

Check my bolded parts in the statement "we'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs."

I believe people are capable of this type of growth, and the fact that non-belief is the fastest growing segment by a multiple supports that belief. They just need to know it is OK with society for them to follow the logic to that position.


I’m in awe of your arrogance. I’m a faithful person and I am quite aware that I contribute to making this country “better, stronger, and smarter” in my role as a high school teacher. Yes, I believe in God. I believe it takes courage and conviction to have faith in the unseen. I don’t push my beliefs on others, though.

The fact you are? I wonder which of us is more dangerous.


Sorry, but my post was not about you, or any individual.

"We'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs"

If you teach high school - a worthy and contributory endeavor, thank you - then you certainly can understand the difference.

ps no need to ad hominem along with your point, I did not respond in kind on purpose.


Yet you are speaking directly to me if you want people to “voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord” give up beliefs. I have beliefs, strongly held ones that direct my sense of morality and the direction of my endeavors. They are most definitely rooted in faith. If I follow your argument from previous threads (and I assume they are yours considering the similar words), you desire a country in which we no longer participate in various religions. You say you are not speaking to any one individual, but aren’t you calling for people (individuals) to “grow” into non-belief? Am I reading your posts wrong?

Yes, I find this type of thinking arrogant. It assumes that my path is inherently wrong and that I must “grow” into something that I find contrary to my values.

I wouldn’t presume to tell you to adopt my beliefs, nor would I suggest you need to grow out of yours.


No, I am definitely NOT speaking directly to you. I don't know you. I have no idea what you believe and also didn't ask you to change. I didn't ask you to adopt my beliefs. I said, again:

We'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs

I see supernatural beliefs rapidly disappearing in the US as all the polls show, and I see a lot of harm being done in their name. So I think we'll all be better off when that is finally over, although it will likely not be in my lifetime. I think when people really evaluate the supernatural, and the lack of evidence for it, they will voluntarily abandon it, especially if societal pressures don't inhibit that. But I DON'T think people should be made to do it, and I certainly don't think I will change your mind here in this anonymous forum.

You are taking this very personally, and I wonder why? I do not want to speculate so maybe you can explain?

If you'd like to sincerely and rationally discuss your specific beliefs, I am pleased to do that - in fact I welcome it - but my intention was not to debate individuals about what they believe in this thread, so I will leave that up to you.


Some people take even anonymous comments about religion very personally. It's built in to some religious thinking to be defensive of people who do not agree with your religious views. It's like "Defending the faith" or something.

It could also be a way of fending off doubts. If you protest loudly enough, maybe people who inadvertently challenge your beliefs will just go away.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article isn’t troubling. 61% of Republicans said they favored the government declaring the US a Christian nation, and most of those were older Americans. Most under 40 disagreed. So, you can relax.


Because the old folks will die soon, right? Still, it's scary, because these are the people who studied Civics in public school where they learned that the US is not a Christian nation.


Well, they learned that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; but they also learned that the US was founded on Judeo Christian values, and most of the people who settled the US were Christian.


Nope.

https://www.salon.com/2021/05/03/america-was-not-founded-as-a-christian-country-based-on-judeo-christian-values_partner/

https://bigthink.com/the-present/why-americas-christian-foundation-is-a-myth/

https://www.atheists.org/activism/resources/american-history/

the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli

The biggest clue it is not founded on Judeo-Christian values? The Bible is not mentioned once in the constitution. I wonder why that is...


This is scary that you think because the Bible isn’t mentioned in the Constitution our country isn’t based on Judeo Christian values. The book you cite is written by someone who created a bunch of straw man arguments (the pledge of allegiance and “One Nation Under God” were not part of our founding principles, but that doesn’t negate the Judeo Christian principles our founders espoused. Name any early settlement and there was a church at the center of it.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article isn’t troubling. 61% of Republicans said they favored the government declaring the US a Christian nation, and most of those were older Americans. Most under 40 disagreed. So, you can relax.


Because the old folks will die soon, right? Still, it's scary, because these are the people who studied Civics in public school where they learned that the US is not a Christian nation.


Well, they learned that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; but they also learned that the US was founded on Judeo Christian values, and most of the people who settled the US were Christian.


Nope.

https://www.salon.com/2021/05/03/america-was-not-founded-as-a-christian-country-based-on-judeo-christian-values_partner/

https://bigthink.com/the-present/why-americas-christian-foundation-is-a-myth/

https://www.atheists.org/activism/resources/american-history/

the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli

The biggest clue it is not founded on Judeo-Christian values? The Bible is not mentioned once in the constitution. I wonder why that is...


This is scary that you think because the Bible isn’t mentioned in the Constitution our country isn’t based on Judeo Christian values. The book you cite is written by someone who created a bunch of straw man arguments (the pledge of allegiance and “One Nation Under God” were not part of our founding principles, but that doesn’t negate the Judeo Christian principles our founders espoused. Name any early settlement and there was a church at the center of it.


So what? All that means is that someone had the means to build it. It could mean a lot of other things too, but does not prove Christianity is central to the US constitution.

The original settlers were Anglo Saxon - that doesn't mean that subsequent immigrants should be shut out.

Then of course, there are the native Americans.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article isn’t troubling. 61% of Republicans said they favored the government declaring the US a Christian nation, and most of those were older Americans. Most under 40 disagreed. So, you can relax.


Because the old folks will die soon, right? Still, it's scary, because these are the people who studied Civics in public school where they learned that the US is not a Christian nation.


Well, they learned that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; but they also learned that the US was founded on Judeo Christian values, and most of the people who settled the US were Christian.


Nope.

https://www.salon.com/2021/05/03/america-was-not-founded-as-a-christian-country-based-on-judeo-christian-values_partner/

https://bigthink.com/the-present/why-americas-christian-foundation-is-a-myth/

https://www.atheists.org/activism/resources/american-history/

the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli

The biggest clue it is not founded on Judeo-Christian values? The Bible is not mentioned once in the constitution. I wonder why that is...


This is scary that you think because the Bible isn’t mentioned in the Constitution our country isn’t based on Judeo Christian values. The book you cite is written by someone who created a bunch of straw man arguments (the pledge of allegiance and “One Nation Under God” were not part of our founding principles, but that doesn’t negate the Judeo Christian principles our founders espoused. Name any early settlement and there was a church at the center of it.


Name one judeo Christian value that didn’t exist long before Judaism or Christianity.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Christian Democrats and lots of Republican Christians and other religious are against that too, OP. Atheists don't hold a monopoly on fighting to maintain the separation of church and state.


That's true. And Christians don't believe in any supernatural phenomena other than their own. But they do believe in their own, and that is a political problem, and a problem for the rest of us who do not believe in it.

I just think we'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs.


Lenin, Stalin and Mao agree.

Seriously, though, hyperbole like your OP just makes the people you’re concerned about harden their positions. I say this as someone who’s appalled by Trump’s Supreme Court nominees and the end of Roe v. Wade. Instead give a thought to psychology and ease up on the hyperbole.



Lenin, Stalin and Mao? Who is dealing in hyperbole and propaganda now?

Check my bolded parts in the statement "we'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs."

I believe people are capable of this type of growth, and the fact that non-belief is the fastest growing segment by a multiple supports that belief. They just need to know it is OK with society for them to follow the logic to that position.


I’m in awe of your arrogance. I’m a faithful person and I am quite aware that I contribute to making this country “better, stronger, and smarter” in my role as a high school teacher. Yes, I believe in God. I believe it takes courage and conviction to have faith in the unseen. I don’t push my beliefs on others, though.

The fact you are? I wonder which of us is more dangerous.


You say "I believe it takes courage and conviction to have faith in the unseen." I don't think so. I think people are taught that as children, and while they easily give up on other beliefs in the unseen (e.g., Santa, the tooth fairy), some people persist in believing in another form of the unseen -- God. That's fine -- or it can be fine, if it makes you feel good and doesn't interfere negatively in your life. But "courage and conviction" it is not. It's simply a preference.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Christian Democrats and lots of Republican Christians and other religious are against that too, OP. Atheists don't hold a monopoly on fighting to maintain the separation of church and state.


That's true. And Christians don't believe in any supernatural phenomena other than their own. But they do believe in their own, and that is a political problem, and a problem for the rest of us who do not believe in it.

I just think we'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs.


Lenin, Stalin and Mao agree.

Seriously, though, hyperbole like your OP just makes the people you’re concerned about harden their positions. I say this as someone who’s appalled by Trump’s Supreme Court nominees and the end of Roe v. Wade. Instead give a thought to psychology and ease up on the hyperbole.



Lenin, Stalin and Mao? Who is dealing in hyperbole and propaganda now?

Check my bolded parts in the statement "we'll be a much better, stronger and smarter country once people have voluntarily, logically, and of their own accord given up reliance on supernatural beliefs."

I believe people are capable of this type of growth, and the fact that non-belief is the fastest growing segment by a multiple supports that belief. They just need to know it is OK with society for them to follow the logic to that position.


I’m in awe of your arrogance. I’m a faithful person and I am quite aware that I contribute to making this country “better, stronger, and smarter” in my role as a high school teacher. Yes, I believe in God. I believe it takes courage and conviction to have faith in the unseen. I don’t push my beliefs on others, though.

The fact you are? I wonder which of us is more dangerous.


I don't see that pp is pushing any beliefs on you. They are expressing their views, which are different from yours. You both have a right to do that, in this secular country
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article isn’t troubling. 61% of Republicans said they favored the government declaring the US a Christian nation, and most of those were older Americans. Most under 40 disagreed. So, you can relax.


Because the old folks will die soon, right? Still, it's scary, because these are the people who studied Civics in public school where they learned that the US is not a Christian nation.


Well, they learned that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; but they also learned that the US was founded on Judeo Christian values, and most of the people who settled the US were Christian.


Nope.

https://www.salon.com/2021/05/03/america-was-not-founded-as-a-christian-country-based-on-judeo-christian-values_partner/

https://bigthink.com/the-present/why-americas-christian-foundation-is-a-myth/

https://www.atheists.org/activism/resources/american-history/

the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli

The biggest clue it is not founded on Judeo-Christian values? The Bible is not mentioned once in the constitution. I wonder why that is...


This is scary that you think because the Bible isn’t mentioned in the Constitution our country isn’t based on Judeo Christian values. The book you cite is written by someone who created a bunch of straw man arguments (the pledge of allegiance and “One Nation Under God” were not part of our founding principles, but that doesn’t negate the Judeo Christian principles our founders espoused. Name any early settlement and there was a church at the center of it.


I’m going to blow your mind when I tell you some of the Founders were Deist. I’m also going to blow your mind when I tell you the concept of an overarching “Judeo Christian” identity would have been totally foreign to them. They lived in a time when there were Catholic colonies, Church of England colonies, Protestant colonies, and “tolerant” colonies. Europe’s various religious wars and massacres - among the people who believed in Christ as savior but quibbled on the details - were living memory for them. The idea of a “Christian” nation would have been nonsense because which do you pick?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article isn’t troubling. 61% of Republicans said they favored the government declaring the US a Christian nation, and most of those were older Americans. Most under 40 disagreed. So, you can relax.


Because the old folks will die soon, right? Still, it's scary, because these are the people who studied Civics in public school where they learned that the US is not a Christian nation.


Well, they learned that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; but they also learned that the US was founded on Judeo Christian values, and most of the people who settled the US were Christian.


Nope.

https://www.salon.com/2021/05/03/america-was-not-founded-as-a-christian-country-based-on-judeo-christian-values_partner/

https://bigthink.com/the-present/why-americas-christian-foundation-is-a-myth/

https://www.atheists.org/activism/resources/american-history/

the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli

The biggest clue it is not founded on Judeo-Christian values? The Bible is not mentioned once in the constitution. I wonder why that is...


This is scary that you think because the Bible isn’t mentioned in the Constitution our country isn’t based on Judeo Christian values. The book you cite is written by someone who created a bunch of straw man arguments (the pledge of allegiance and “One Nation Under God” were not part of our founding principles, but that doesn’t negate the Judeo Christian principles our founders espoused. Name any early settlement and there was a church at the center of it.


Churches are important within a community from a social perspective. NOT within the government.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:This article isn’t troubling. 61% of Republicans said they favored the government declaring the US a Christian nation, and most of those were older Americans. Most under 40 disagreed. So, you can relax.


Because the old folks will die soon, right? Still, it's scary, because these are the people who studied Civics in public school where they learned that the US is not a Christian nation.


Well, they learned that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; but they also learned that the US was founded on Judeo Christian values, and most of the people who settled the US were Christian.


Nope.

https://www.salon.com/2021/05/03/america-was-not-founded-as-a-christian-country-based-on-judeo-christian-values_partner/

https://bigthink.com/the-present/why-americas-christian-foundation-is-a-myth/

https://www.atheists.org/activism/resources/american-history/

the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Tripoli

The biggest clue it is not founded on Judeo-Christian values? The Bible is not mentioned once in the constitution. I wonder why that is...


This is scary that you think because the Bible isn’t mentioned in the Constitution our country isn’t based on Judeo Christian values. The book you cite is written by someone who created a bunch of straw man arguments (the pledge of allegiance and “One Nation Under God” were not part of our founding principles, but that doesn’t negate the Judeo Christian principles our founders espoused. Name any early settlement and there was a church at the center of it.


I’m going to blow your mind when I tell you some of the Founders were Deist. I’m also going to blow your mind when I tell you the concept of an overarching “Judeo Christian” identity would have been totally foreign to them. They lived in a time when there were Catholic colonies, Church of England colonies, Protestant colonies, and “tolerant” colonies. Europe’s various religious wars and massacres - among the people who believed in Christ as savior but quibbled on the details - were living memory for them. The idea of a “Christian” nation would have been nonsense because which do you pick?


+1 Also, I just found this piece on George Washington's religious beliefs put out by the Mount Vernon organization https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/george-washington-and-religion/. Below are the last two paragraphs. The whole thing is short and very informative.

"Washington was also tolerant of different religious beliefs, having attended services of multiple Christian denominations. He once publicly supported an army chaplain who was a Universalist (meaning that he held that Christ died for the sins of all, versus only the elect) despite the objections of other clergy. In fact, while President, Washington wrote a letter to the Hebrew Congregation in Newport, Rhode Island standing in favor of religious freedom, explaining: "For happily the government of the United States, which gives to bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance, requires only that they who live under its protection should demean themselves as good citizens…May the children of the stock of Abraham, who dwell in this land, continue to merit and enjoy the goodwill of the other inhabitants."3

Overall, Washington's religious life is an area of great debate and much in line with his contemporaries. His religious life is complex and should be approached as such, without trite labels and descriptions."
-------

Personally, I recall from a tour of Christ Church in Alexandria VA, where Washington attended, that he was known for leaving before communion. This practice is also mentioned in the piece above.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Whether it actually happens or not is not the concern. The concern is that people are out there actively wanting it, and these people have influence in many many places, at the state, local and federal levels. From school boards to the supreme court. We’ve seen this at all those levels recently and it is terrifying and religion is the core part of the problem.

And before anybody explodes, I’m not saying all religious people are this way. But religion itself is a problem. It’s the 21st-century and we hang onto these beliefs at our own peril.


Religion is not a problem.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Whether it actually happens or not is not the concern. The concern is that people are out there actively wanting it, and these people have influence in many many places, at the state, local and federal levels. From school boards to the supreme court. We’ve seen this at all those levels recently and it is terrifying and religion is the core part of the problem.

And before anybody explodes, I’m not saying all religious people are this way. But religion itself is a problem. It’s the 21st-century and we hang onto these beliefs at our own peril.


Religion is not a problem.


+1. Simplistic and ignorant statements like this never win arguments. They just make the speaker look … simple and ignorant. Maybe bigoted too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Whether it actually happens or not is not the concern. The concern is that people are out there actively wanting it, and these people have influence in many many places, at the state, local and federal levels. From school boards to the supreme court. We’ve seen this at all those levels recently and it is terrifying and religion is the core part of the problem.

And before anybody explodes, I’m not saying all religious people are this way. But religion itself is a problem. It’s the 21st-century and we hang onto these beliefs at our own peril.


Religion is not a problem.


+1. Simplistic and ignorant statements like this never win arguments. They just make the speaker look … simple and ignorant. Maybe bigoted too.


Oh yes it is a problem. Would you like a list?

As for simple and ignorant, I can present evidence for what I think, can you? And you always resort to ad hominem. So ironic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Whether it actually happens or not is not the concern. The concern is that people are out there actively wanting it, and these people have influence in many many places, at the state, local and federal levels. From school boards to the supreme court. We’ve seen this at all those levels recently and it is terrifying and religion is the core part of the problem.

And before anybody explodes, I’m not saying all religious people are this way. But religion itself is a problem. It’s the 21st-century and we hang onto these beliefs at our own peril.


Religion is not a problem.


+1. Simplistic and ignorant statements like this never win arguments. They just make the speaker look … simple and ignorant. Maybe bigoted too.


Oh yes it is a problem. Would you like a list?

As for simple and ignorant, I can present evidence for what I think, can you? And you always resort to ad hominem. So ironic.


Your list is pointless. Stalin, Lenin, Mai and Pol Pot also killed millions, and with recent memory. Plus they oppressed their citizens for decades. If you want to chest-bump about lists, it’s just going to look silly.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Whether it actually happens or not is not the concern. The concern is that people are out there actively wanting it, and these people have influence in many many places, at the state, local and federal levels. From school boards to the supreme court. We’ve seen this at all those levels recently and it is terrifying and religion is the core part of the problem.

And before anybody explodes, I’m not saying all religious people are this way. But religion itself is a problem. It’s the 21st-century and we hang onto these beliefs at our own peril.


Religion is not a problem.


+1. Simplistic and ignorant statements like this never win arguments. They just make the speaker look … simple and ignorant. Maybe bigoted too.


Oh yes it is a problem. Would you like a list?

As for simple and ignorant, I can present evidence for what I think, can you? And you always resort to ad hominem. So ironic.



You can have an opinion, but your opinion isn’t everyone’s opinion nor does it make it fact.

post reply Forum Index » Religion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: